similar to: Problem with Shorewall/Routing VPN - LOC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Macklem wrote: | Tom, | | As I said in a previous mail, these rules file changes work. Thanks. | | However, I''m not sure that your firewall changes to handle the GATEWAY column in the tunnels file does work. I downloaded the most recent STABLE2 release from CVS and replaced my copy of the firewall script with the updated version

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

I''ve got what I think is a fairly simple home network configuration with one Linux box functioning as the firewall, VPN server, DHCP server and file/print server. I am having trouble configuring both a VPN server (PopTop) and the firewall rules for a W2K PPTP VPN client. The VPN server runs on the firewall machine and the VPN client runs on a W2K machine behind the firewall. The VPN

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN

Hi Tom, I nearly completed the test and installation related to http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm. However, there is no serious problem when it is operated as it is in the general companies, but there is Client Program for MS-Window that is operated only by Public IP. So I am very concerned about it. I would like to use Internet through Gateway in (B) as local computers in (A) receive Public

Ok. That''s probably really confusing. :) Here''s what I''d like to do. If it''s something that''s overly difficult or just plain stupid, let me know. :) I''m on cable with a dynamic IP. I have a domain forwarding account pointing to me. That is techiem2.no-ip.com. The firewall is 192.168.100.1. My web server is on port 444 on machine

Running "rake stats" shows validates_presence_of :stuff, :more_stuff, :yet_more_stuff As two lines of code (LOC). I think it should be one line of code, since it''s one statement. An easy way to do that would be to not count the lines with a comma at the end. Joe

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:15 PM > To: Shorewall Development > Subject: [Shorewall-devel] [Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to > fw::3128 not work (fwd) > > > I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules > file to designate redirection/forwarding is

Romeo Petruca wrote: > wine mysql.exe -h localhost -u root -p First of all, why are you using windows' version or 'mysql' client and not native Linux version? Romeo Petruca wrote: > i got this error: > ERROR 2005 (HY000): Unknown MySQL server host 'localhost' (10093) Most likely it's trying to use pipe and fails of course. Add '--protocol=TCP' option.

How would I use Big Brother with Shorewall and my loc and dmz zones to monitor hosts in both zones? If Big Brother''s server is on my LAN (loc) is it "safe" to forward the bb port from the dmz to the LAN? What would the security risks of this be? Common sense says that it may not be a good idea to forward stuff from the dmz to the LAN, but I''m inexperienced and unsure

BTW, it looks like LLVM has broken the 100,000 LOC mark. :) ~/llvm$ wc `utils/getsrcs.sh ` ... 100384 419463 3658827 total -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Dear All, With the help of Reid Spencer, UIUC CS IT support, and Patrick Jenkins, the LOC graph on the nightly tester has returned. -- John T.

Hi, is there a reason why when calling the argument 'lib.loc' of library() is not used when trying to load the required packages? 0. Package A depends on package B 1. Install packages A and B in a subdirectory 'lib' of the current directory 2. Call: library(A, lib.loc='./lib') This will give something like the following: Loading required package: B Error: package

Not sure whether it is the same issue as was raised here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-October/058729.html but in any case perhaps the problem could partially be remedied on line 245 of src/library/base/R/library.R by passing the lib.loc to .getRequiredPackages2() ...here is a patch (untested) Index: src/library/base/R/library.R

On 25.07.2018 04:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: > Good day, > > A self-contained example which reproduces the problem is > > packagesFolder <- tempdir() > latestFolder <- file.path(packagesFolder, "latest") > dir.create(latestFolder) > > devtools::create(file.path(latestFolder, "statistics"), description = list(Version = "1.1.0", Depends

library() takes lib.loc as the third argument. Where is this set? I am modifying the default library search path and everything seems to be ok except for this (I want R_HOME/lib/library rather than R_HOME/library). -- albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com) -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

I am trying to use the function 'filter.NA=TRUE' in Geneland. The function appears to be set on TRUE by default, as it appears as TRUE in the 'parameter.txt' file output and hence I do not need to enter the function per se (as it is an 'Unused argument otherwise') . Hence all my missing data (individuals that I have not yet scored at that specific loci) are scored as

Good Morning Everyone, I have a server that runs Shorewall/Samba/PPTP (Poptop). When we try to connect to the PPTP server from outside of the company, the Windows XP pro client can establish the connection. We can then ping the server and the clients behind the server without any problem, but the issue becomes that we cannot map to any of the shares on the samba server or to any client for that

Il giorno gio, 05/03/2020 alle 15.07 +0000, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > I think I said use either the dhcp script or allow your clients to > update their own records. The problem is, if you previously used the > DHCP script, the clients records no longer belong to the clients, so > they will not be able to update them. Try deleting the records and > allow > the