similar to: R-4.0.0 and Texlive 2020 installed on EmmabuntusDE4 (Debian Bullseye)

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your comments. I run sudo apt install -t bullseye-cran40 r-base and have now the current R-4.0.0 in /usr/lib/R with links in the menus and R-devel R-4.1.0 in ~/patrice/svn/R/r-devel/build. Perfect. I used sid just to get the full Texlive 2020. I will probably not update it for a while and have already removed (commented) the sid line in sources.list as I do not

Dear all, I am getting an R CMD check warning about the PDF manual. I am having a hard time finding out what is wrong, here is the log of the Rd2pdf call. The full check (and other) log is at https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/46373922/log.txt?deansi=true if anybody is interested, and the package itself is here: https://github.com/metacran/r-builder/tree/bintex/rbuildertest Thanks, Best, Gabor

Hi, The following command: R CMD Rd2pdf --no-preview --output=./tmp.pdf --title=test genefu-package.Rd run against this file: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/genefu/man/genefu-package.Rd (username: readonly; password: readonly) produces a very verbose error (see below) with R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-07 r58622). The .Rd file has these lines in it: Version: \tab

I want write article by russian language using Sweave. For cyrillic text LaTeX use T2A encoding \usepackage[T2A]{fontenc} But in Sweave.sty we find: \RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc} It is source of critical problem. For example Rnw file $ cat estimation.Rnw \documentclass[A4paper]{article} \usepackage[T2A]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[russian,english]{babel}

Hi, Due to a change in Rd.sty a few days ago (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/620eb9a#diff-3bf3d821c6faae50cd6ec931f6f63296L272), the default installation of TeXLive 2009 or 2012 no longer works when building Rd to PDF. The error log is like this: =============== Converting Rd files to LaTeX ..... Creating pdf output from LaTeX ... Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean,

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, I?aki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: >> >> On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R >> packages: >> >> R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi >> R-stringr R-yaml >> >> are installed, although I

Hi all I am trying to build an R package, which I have successfully done many times before, but have an error I cannot trace. I hope someone can help me. Here's is some edited output (full output below if it is useful): pdunn2 at PDunnUbuntu:~/DSdata$ R CMD build GLMsData * checking for file 'GLMsData/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'GLMsData': * checking DESCRIPTION

Some while ago I posted a problem on this list concerning a failure of R CMD check on one of my packages that resulted from LaTeX being unable to find the "inconsolata" font. This was under the Ubuntu OS. This was solved, thanks to advice I got from this list, basically by doing sudo apt-get install texlive-fonts-extra I am now (for reasons which I won't go into) running

Hello ALL! I am running Fedora 16 x86_64. Due to some dubious problems with the TeXLive (2007, which is a default), I removed it. That removed R as well, and some other dependent packages. Then, I installed TeXLive 2011 from CTAN. However, when I wanted to install R, from Fedora's repositories, it asks for some TeX dependencies (for example, tex-preview, texinfo-tex, texlive, texlive-dvips

Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any way. If this is the case, it's a bug and I'd

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 19:12, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > My point exactly. It should only run R RHOME to check for the existence of > R (if this is what it does) at run time, not at install time. If it then, > at run time, does not find R, or having found R does not find knitr > (though Sweave is part of utils, so knitr is only needed by those using >

I am trying to build the latest version of R (3.6.2) on a CentOS system running 7.7.1908. I have been able to build previous versions of R up to and including 3.5.3 successfully. Starting with 3.6.0 the "make check" step fails with errors relating to "pdflatex" being missing. So, I installed texlive-latex (and the 100 other rpm dependencies) then tried rebuilding R.

Hello ALL! I am running Fedora 16 x86_64. Due to some dubious problems, that i couldn't resolve, with the TeXLive (2007, which is a default), I removed it. That removed R as well, and some other dependent packages. Then, I installed TeXLive 2011 from CTAN. However, when I wanted to install R, from Fedora's repositories, it asks for some TeX dependencies (for example, tex-preview,

How exactly to use the tag "Obsoletes:" in a spec file ? I need to offer texlive to users on Centos-5.6, so I packaged it (based on a Mandriva src.rpm), and that works. But I want rpm to *replace* tetex by texlive, instead of just adding texlive, when users do a : $ yum install texlive (we have a local repo here). So I added this line in texlive.spec : Obsoletes: tetex and of

On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R packages: R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi R-stringr R-yaml are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep my Rs locally. So I don't use Fedora R rpms, but these were installed without my command. Something in texlive is doing this. A remedy is to

dear R users, I am using sweave to generate report for my data analysis. I recently updated R ro 2.8.0, and now I have the following results when compile the the tex file generated from R. This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) %&-line parsing enabled. entering extended mode (./Lajos.tex LaTeX2e <2005/12/01> Babel <v3.8h> and hyphenation patterns for english,

I've moved most of my user's PCs from OpenSuse (11.x, unmaintainend now) to CentOS 6.4. On my old OpenSuse latex was "texlive-latex-2010" and current version on CTAN is texlive-2013. But on CentOS 6.4 I've only the old texlive-latex-2007 and several sty files available on my previous config are not available now and users cannot compile their previous documents. Is

You're definitely missing bits of texlive. Lots of "missing file: mf" in your debug logs. I think you need to start with installing texlive-metafont. Alternately, there are pre-built R 3.6.2 packages for EL-7 here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1421894 I cannot push them as official updates to EPEL because of the catch-22 created by R's dependency on

I always install official TeXLive in /usr/local/texlive - yum update thanks me. Every few months I update it, but keeping it outside of RPM means I don't get tons of individual packages, many that I never use, constantly updating in yum. On 07/21/2017 11:46 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nicolas Kovacs

Dear R?ers I?m trying to get a summary table using latex and summary in the rms package to no avail. I?m running R 2.10.1, Mac OS X snow leopard and I have the mactex 2009 distribution installed. Any obvious things I?m missing? //M options(digits=3) set.seed(173) sex <- factor(sample(c("m","f"), 500, rep=TRUE)) age <- rnorm(500, 50, 5) treatment <-