Roger Bivand
2018-Nov-10 17:35 UTC
[R-sig-Fedora] Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, I?aki Ucar wrote:> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: >> >> On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R >> packages: >> >> R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi >> R-stringr R-yaml >> >> are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep >> my Rs locally. So I don't use Fedora R rpms, but these were installed >> without my command. >> >> Something in texlive is doing this. A remedy is to yse rpm -r --nodeps <> >> to get rid of them, because dnf remove R-core takes out texlive too. I do >> use the RStudio rpm, but by command-line install, so it isn't the culprit. >> However, the choice of packages points to an injudicious editing of an rpm >> dependency list in some texlive package related to rmarkdown or similar. > > $ dnf repoquery --tree --whatrequires R-knitr > > texlive-scheme-medium installs texlive-collection-mathscience, which > installs texlive-includernw, which necessarily depends on R-knitr.Thanks for the analysis. I do not see that any other latex package in texlive-sceme-medium involves creating such havoc drawing in non-texlive packages. I appeal to Andreas Storvik Strauman to ensure that texlive-includernw is forthwith withdrawn from texlive-collection-mathscience, because of its side-effects. It may be useful, but actually Rnw files would only need R anyway, and bringinging such a payload is really very bad for everybody not exposed to this behaviour previously. I wasted a lot of time trying to see why Rcpp could not find R.h in a previously totally dependable workflow.> > The solution is not to depend on texlive collections. Install > texlive-scheme-basic instead, plus additional packages as you need > them.Not an option. Installing texlive-scheme-* should not have non-texlive side effects. Roger> > I?aki > >> I'm reporting this here in case other Fedora users are puzzled to see >> another R (or an rpm R) appearing on their systems if they also use >> texlive. >> >> If anyone has any ideas about resolving this properly, I'd be grateful (it >> isn't the best way to spread the use of R among Fedora texlive users IMO). >> Unfortunately, DNF/RPM and likely other packaging systems have issues >> detecting user-installed programs like R, so trying "R RHOME" isn't going >> to work when say ~/bin is where R lives. Almost certainly, the texlive >> component should not be included in any scheme groups. >> >> I would CC RStudio, but support does not expose an email, so I'm CC-ing >> the rmarkown maintainer. >> >> Roger >> >> -- >> Roger Bivand >> Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, >> Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. >> voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no >> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 >> https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > >-- Roger Bivand Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en
Andreas Storvik Strauman
2018-Nov-10 17:56 UTC
[R-sig-Fedora] Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any way. If this is the case, it's a bug and I'd like more details so I could fix said bug. I agree that for larger projects using includeRnw easily would be redundant as R is invoked on a per-file basis and not by it's own including syntax. However, one might like files properly separated and executed individually. I myself find it a fairly nice workflow for many of my projects. ________________________________ From: Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 6:35:05 PM To: I?aki Ucar Cc: r-sig-fedora at r-project.org; Andreas Storvik Strauman Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw) On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, I?aki Ucar wrote:> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: >> >> On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R >> packages: >> >> R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi >> R-stringr R-yaml >> >> are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep >> my Rs locally. So I don't use Fedora R rpms, but these were installed >> without my command. >> >> Something in texlive is doing this. A remedy is to yse rpm -r --nodeps <> >> to get rid of them, because dnf remove R-core takes out texlive too. I do >> use the RStudio rpm, but by command-line install, so it isn't the culprit. >> However, the choice of packages points to an injudicious editing of an rpm >> dependency list in some texlive package related to rmarkdown or similar. > > $ dnf repoquery --tree --whatrequires R-knitr > > texlive-scheme-medium installs texlive-collection-mathscience, which > installs texlive-includernw, which necessarily depends on R-knitr.Thanks for the analysis. I do not see that any other latex package in texlive-sceme-medium involves creating such havoc drawing in non-texlive packages. I appeal to Andreas Storvik Strauman to ensure that texlive-includernw is forthwith withdrawn from texlive-collection-mathscience, because of its side-effects. It may be useful, but actually Rnw files would only need R anyway, and bringinging such a payload is really very bad for everybody not exposed to this behaviour previously. I wasted a lot of time trying to see why Rcpp could not find R.h in a previously totally dependable workflow.> > The solution is not to depend on texlive collections. Install > texlive-scheme-basic instead, plus additional packages as you need > them.Not an option. Installing texlive-scheme-* should not have non-texlive side effects. Roger> > I?aki > >> I'm reporting this here in case other Fedora users are puzzled to see >> another R (or an rpm R) appearing on their systems if they also use >> texlive. >> >> If anyone has any ideas about resolving this properly, I'd be grateful (it >> isn't the best way to spread the use of R among Fedora texlive users IMO). >> Unfortunately, DNF/RPM and likely other packaging systems have issues >> detecting user-installed programs like R, so trying "R RHOME" isn't going >> to work when say ~/bin is where R lives. Almost certainly, the texlive >> component should not be included in any scheme groups. >> >> I would CC RStudio, but support does not expose an email, so I'm CC-ing >> the rmarkown maintainer. >> >> Roger >> >> -- >> Roger Bivand >> Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, >> Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. >> voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no >> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 >> https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > >-- Roger Bivand Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Roger Bivand
2018-Nov-10 18:12 UTC
[R-sig-Fedora] Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, Andreas Storvik Strauman wrote:> Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is > the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may > I be given an opportunity to fix said problem?Yes, the problem is that it expesses an external dependence on anything outside texlive. On packaging systems (for me Fedora), this explicitly pulls in all of R and all R-knitr's other package dependencies. If an existing R installation is not found by the package manager, the user gets an unnecessary install of R which will mask the existing and intended R installation, with different package libraries, etc.> > includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should > not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any > way. If this is the case, it's a bug and I'd like more details so I > could fix said bug.My point exactly. It should only run R RHOME to check for the existence of R (if this is what it does) at run time, not at install time. If it then, at run time, does not find R, or having found R does not find knitr (though Sweave is part of utils, so knitr is only needed by those using knitr to weave Rnw documents, or to convert from Rmd), it should issue helpful error messages to tell the user to install R, or to install knitr within R. By requiring to see R when being run by root/admin at install time, it is making invasive assumptions about the user environment. It could be that the texlive-includernw package itself does not require install time dependency fulfillment, and that this is something only the Fedora texlive packager has mis-understood.> > I agree that for larger projects using includeRnw easily would be > redundant as R is invoked on a per-file basis and not by it's own > including syntax. However, one might like files properly separated and > executed individually. I myself find it a fairly nice workflow for many > of my projects.R is a pretty large install just for one texlive package. Roger> > ________________________________ > From: Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 6:35:05 PM > To: I?aki Ucar > Cc: r-sig-fedora at r-project.org; Andreas Storvik Strauman > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw) > > On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, I?aki Ucar wrote: > >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: >>> >>> On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R >>> packages: >>> >>> R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi >>> R-stringr R-yaml >>> >>> are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep >>> my Rs locally. So I don't use Fedora R rpms, but these were installed >>> without my command. >>> >>> Something in texlive is doing this. A remedy is to yse rpm -r --nodeps <> >>> to get rid of them, because dnf remove R-core takes out texlive too. I do >>> use the RStudio rpm, but by command-line install, so it isn't the culprit. >>> However, the choice of packages points to an injudicious editing of an rpm >>> dependency list in some texlive package related to rmarkdown or similar. >> >> $ dnf repoquery --tree --whatrequires R-knitr >> >> texlive-scheme-medium installs texlive-collection-mathscience, which >> installs texlive-includernw, which necessarily depends on R-knitr. > > Thanks for the analysis. I do not see that any other latex package in > texlive-sceme-medium involves creating such havoc drawing in non-texlive > packages. > > I appeal to Andreas Storvik Strauman to ensure that texlive-includernw is > forthwith withdrawn from texlive-collection-mathscience, because of its > side-effects. > > It may be useful, but actually Rnw files would only need R anyway, and > bringinging such a payload is really very bad for everybody not exposed to > this behaviour previously. I wasted a lot of time trying to see why Rcpp > could not find R.h in a previously totally dependable workflow. > >> >> The solution is not to depend on texlive collections. Install >> texlive-scheme-basic instead, plus additional packages as you need >> them. > > Not an option. Installing texlive-scheme-* should not have non-texlive > side effects. > > Roger > >> >> I?aki >> >>> I'm reporting this here in case other Fedora users are puzzled to see >>> another R (or an rpm R) appearing on their systems if they also use >>> texlive. >>> >>> If anyone has any ideas about resolving this properly, I'd be grateful (it >>> isn't the best way to spread the use of R among Fedora texlive users IMO). >>> Unfortunately, DNF/RPM and likely other packaging systems have issues >>> detecting user-installed programs like R, so trying "R RHOME" isn't going >>> to work when say ~/bin is where R lives. Almost certainly, the texlive >>> component should not be included in any scheme groups. >>> >>> I would CC RStudio, but support does not expose an email, so I'm CC-ing >>> the rmarkown maintainer. >>> >>> Roger >>> >>> -- >>> Roger Bivand >>> Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, >>> Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. >>> voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no >>> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 >>> https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >> >> >> >> > > -- > Roger Bivand > Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, > Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. > voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no > http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 > https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en >-- Roger Bivand Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: Roger.Bivand at nhh.no http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140 https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en
Reasonably Related Threads
- Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
- Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
- Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R (texlive-includernw)
- Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R
- Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R