similar to: Fedora 29 upgrade: texlive-scheme-medium may depend on R

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, I?aki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: >> >> On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R >> packages: >> >> R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi >> R-stringr R-yaml >> >> are installed, although I

Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any way. If this is the case, it's a bug and I'd

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, Andreas Storvik Strauman wrote: > Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is > the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may > I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? Yes, the problem is that it expesses an external dependence on anything outside texlive. On packaging systems (for me Fedora),

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 19:12, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > My point exactly. It should only run R RHOME to check for the existence of > R (if this is what it does) at run time, not at install time. If it then, > at run time, does not find R, or having found R does not find knitr > (though Sweave is part of utils, so knitr is only needed by those using >

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R > packages: > > R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi > R-stringr R-yaml > > are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep > my Rs locally. So I

Hello ALL! I am running Fedora 16 x86_64. Due to some dubious problems with the TeXLive (2007, which is a default), I removed it. That removed R as well, and some other dependent packages. Then, I installed TeXLive 2011 from CTAN. However, when I wanted to install R, from Fedora's repositories, it asks for some TeX dependencies (for example, tex-preview, texinfo-tex, texlive, texlive-dvips

Hello ALL! I am running Fedora 16 x86_64. Due to some dubious problems, that i couldn't resolve, with the TeXLive (2007, which is a default), I removed it. That removed R as well, and some other dependent packages. Then, I installed TeXLive 2011 from CTAN. However, when I wanted to install R, from Fedora's repositories, it asks for some TeX dependencies (for example, tex-preview,

Dear all, I whish to relate my installation of R-4.0.0 on Debian. I am mainly a Windows user and occasionnaly verify the CRAN checks of my packages on a second laptop equipped with Linux Mint Debian Edition 3 (LMDE3) based on Debian Stretch. On Friday, April 24, it took me a few hours to have R-4.0.0 installed on Windows and the sources compiled, thanks to the instructions provided by

Hi, I am currently in the process of installing the latest release that I cloned from git in an effort to complete an application for GSOC. I am running into an issue however with 'make' on my Ubuntu 64bit Linux version . Below is the code that make reports upon exiting with multiple errors. They seems to be related to my latex installation which aborted in error due to missing entry

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your comments. I run sudo apt install -t bullseye-cran40 r-base and have now the current R-4.0.0 in /usr/lib/R with links in the menus and R-devel R-4.1.0 in ~/patrice/svn/R/r-devel/build. Perfect. I used sid just to get the full Texlive 2020. I will probably not update it for a while and have already removed (commented) the sid line in sources.list as I do not

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:24, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > > > In the rgdal package, configure.ac has had : ${LDFLAGS=`"${RBIN}" CMD > > config LDFLAGS`} at least since 2012, so picking up LDFLAGS known to the R > > version installed. Very

I want up-to-dateish versions of TexLive, R, gnumeric, emacs, but on a more-or-less stable base of Centos-5.2. I asked for packages in this, but got no answers. So now I've built them and will let you try them if you want. I used the source packages from Fedora 8 and 9. I wanted TexLive because many of us have jumped ship to Ubuntu Linux 8.04 and it does offer TexLive, and the compatability

Today I installed the newest Centos I could find and encountered the old software problem. I couldn't find any third party repositories that have TexLive to replace tetex. Ii tried the Fedora version, but it calls for a different libpoppler. LyX in Centos is aged as well. As far as I can tell, rpmfusion will provide these things, but its confiig page still says 'not ready.' I

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0137 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0137.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 406a29cf1e1d670947152626b4c065c1a2c3152e7a0e8716fbcc03c06ef4552f kpathsea-2007-57.el6_2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1b0e542c98506f21fc94f5adb0db649ec9d385268871be2741a43bc29d72b124 texlive-texmf-2007-39.el6_7.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1830 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1830.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 85dc8987abbff18e9b914316004e25ce7cbbf21c9e2c05c35c622d0fb26244c8 kpathsea-2007-60.el6_7.i686.rpm

Dear all, I am getting an R CMD check warning about the PDF manual. I am having a hard time finding out what is wrong, here is the log of the Rd2pdf call. The full check (and other) log is at https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/46373922/log.txt?deansi=true if anybody is interested, and the package itself is here: https://github.com/metacran/r-builder/tree/bintex/rbuildertest Thanks, Best, Gabor

Hi, The following command: R CMD Rd2pdf --no-preview --output=./tmp.pdf --title=test genefu-package.Rd run against this file: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/genefu/man/genefu-package.Rd (username: readonly; password: readonly) produces a very verbose error (see below) with R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-07 r58622). The .Rd file has these lines in it: Version: \tab

I want write article by russian language using Sweave. For cyrillic text LaTeX use T2A encoding \usepackage[T2A]{fontenc} But in Sweave.sty we find: \RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc} It is source of critical problem. For example Rnw file $ cat estimation.Rnw \documentclass[A4paper]{article} \usepackage[T2A]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[russian,english]{babel}

Hi, Due to a change in Rd.sty a few days ago (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/620eb9a#diff-3bf3d821c6faae50cd6ec931f6f63296L272), the default installation of TeXLive 2009 or 2012 no longer works when building Rd to PDF. The error log is like this: =============== Converting Rd files to LaTeX ..... Creating pdf output from LaTeX ... Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean,