similar to: Webcasting Rates

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > Anyone (Jack?) see the story on /. yesterday about the webcasting rates? > > Won't that kill all Internet radio under a huge burden of cost? > > Are you saying it wasn't already dying? :) > > Those are set in stone, but similar rates and terms probably soon will > be. Remember, they are retroactive to 1998 or so.

Oh, I almost forgot... If you're going under compulsory licensing: 1) Listener requests cannot be honored, otherwise you will end up labeled an "interactive service" along with Audiogalaxy Rhapsody & the like. Which means more & more expensive royalties. 2) You cannot play more than 3 songs of the same album in any 3 hour period (no more than 2 in a row). Nor can you

Ditto Scott - you nailed it !! But the DMCA actually sets rules on requests and processing them without being considered "interactive" - for instance the time frame allowed from when requests are made and then processed and actually air (minimum 60 minutes), to displaying your playlist - (can not be displayed public in the order of actual performance) basically as long as you never

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > ================================================================== > > hey josh, > > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > > streaming. reasons for this rash decision involve around a new law that > > was put in place over the summer saying that stations who broadcast online > >

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Joshua Vickery wrote: > Great, so should we file with SoundExchange or wait for the RIAA to pick > a rate? Yes, you are supposed to file with the RIAA (SE as you suggest?). Period, end of story. Jwz covers this on his site IIRC. > Even if they insisted on collecting $0.004 per performance I don't think > we have even 100000 "performances" a

Last year I arranged with my college radio station and ITS department to webcast the radiostation using icecast. The webcast has been a wonderful success so far. My problem now is not technical, but political. A few days ago I recieved the following message from the station director: ================================================================== hey josh, i talked to [faculty advisor]

Hi there guys... I've been watching the list for a while, had a quick question. I work for a company (Turtle Beach) that makes a product that takes MP3 files that reside on your PC or Network Attached Storage, and lets you play them anywhere else in your home. (From your stereo for example.) Anyway, we've added basic MP3 streaming support (and have now gone to external beta) that

A bit off-topic question: has anyone any experiences with the relaying service that live365.com has? what kind of stream(s) do they relay? what is the protocol they use? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word

Forewarning... this is my understanding and advice. I am not a lawyer. First off, Jamie Zawinski has an article about this here: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html > ================================================================== > hey josh, > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > streaming. reasons for this rash decision

This is a mail in response to streamripper being threatened by legal action from Live365. The DMCA strikes again. jack. ----- Forwarded message from Fred von Lohmann <fred@vonlohmann.com> ----- Delivered-To: jack@localhost.cantcode.com Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org X-Authentication-Warning: penguin.onehouse.com: majordomo set sender to owner-pho@onehouse.com using -f X-Sent: 31 May 2001

> Everything that I've come across and it is my understanding is that > traditional radio stations are not exempt if they broadcast via the > web. In short, the RIAA and the labels it represents are greedy > individuals and will take their money whereever they can get it. If the > money is green they want it. Great, so should we file with SoundExchange or wait for the RIAA to

Hi all, Hopefully, I'm sending this to the right place... Can someone guide me on changing the Maildir messages files back to the single file format I used to have instead of the dovecot.index /cur /tmp /new format my newer server currently has. I'm running dovecot v1.2.9 postfix v2.7 on Ubuntu v10.4

hi folks, in my (unlucky) first test of ogg vs other encoders, i found a case where wma and mp3pro sound much better than ogg at 64k. can anyone suggest a setting that i haven't tried yet that can rival the wma and mp3pro samples at 64k? it's the "gravel effect" that is troublesome. the part in question is the first 15 seconds of this wave file:

I'll be on TechTV tomorrow on the Screen Savers program betwen 4pm and 5:30pm PST. We'll be talking about webcasting, and specifically about icecast, shoutcast, vorbis, and related things. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing

I'll be on TechTV tomorrow on the Screen Savers program betwen 4pm and 5:30pm PST. We'll be talking about webcasting, and specifically about icecast, shoutcast, vorbis, and related things. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing

> performances. That's ~125,000 performances a year, which equates to about > $180,000. > > Significantly higher than the Frauhofer license, unless you generate > $9Mil/yr or more in revenue from your stream. The rates are in arbitration, and I doubt they will come out anywhere near that amount. It just isn't feasible, even for large companies. Reember, tradidional

Hi All, I attempted to switch my MP3 server from Icecast 1 to Icecast 2 today. I run a Live365 station, Big Planet Radio, which simply relays my local Icecast server. My Icecast 2 error.log file shows a lot of the following messages when the Live365 server, Nanocaster 2.5.6, is connected to it: [2003-05-14 22:09:15] DBUG format-mp3/format_mp3_write_buf_to_client Client had recoverable error

Hi All, I attempted to switch my MP3 server from Icecast 1 to Icecast 2 today. I run a Live365 station, Big Planet Radio, which simply relays my local Icecast server. My Icecast 2 error.log file shows a lot of the following messages when the Live365 server, Nanocaster 2.5.6, is connected to it: [2003-05-14 22:09:15] DBUG format-mp3/format_mp3_write_buf_to_client Client had recoverable error

If anyone else is using Live365 and having problems getting their streams to show up.. I found out something interesting today. I've been emailing back and forth asking them why I can listen to my mirror just fine on their service if I use the javascript I ripped out of their site and put into mine to open up their little mini-window, but when I do a search for the station it doesn't

> One more reason why computers will never replace real DJ's ;-) I believe its called desktop webcasting or will be ;) Doesnt sound like replacing dj's, its just enabling them to dj remotely without the need and fuss localy oh and not to mention redundancy, doing a webcast from a house/office/home pc is a major ordeal with todays shitty dsl/cable providers just my 2 dollaws