similar to: Way to decode specific channel(s) flac --decode?

Martijn van Beurden wrote: > No, there is not. To make sure the encoding and decoding > processes are lossless, there are no switches like these. You > will have to use another program, like SoX, to do this. I was not aware this behavior was considered lossy and I didn't know that only lossless encoding and decoding was a goal. Specifically, I thought extracting only some channels

Dear all, I would like to know whether it is possible to use any DRM scheme with Ogg-Vorbis ? My idea would be to distribute music commercially and be able guarantee to artists that they won't be copied freely. Thanks for your advice. Regards, Ulrich ulrich@bbtest.roxr.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

By the way, I was delighted to find out that I could join .ogg files with cat, i.e. cat {file1.ogg} file2.ogg > outputfile.ogg <p>I successfully used this capability, together with oggenc and sox, to join two .WAV files in the following manner: <p>oggenc -q9 file1.wav ... oggenc -q9 file2.wav --- cat file1.ogg file2.ogg > outfile.ogg ox outfile.ogg outfile.wav I get

I'm playing the "Honey" movie (both Honey-small and Honey-large) and I notice significant slowdown during periods of lots of motion (when the camera shakes, when the first man hops into bed, when people turn around and approach the camera, etc.). The audio plays smoothly all the time but when there is a lot of motion, the picture freezes and resumes when there's less motion.

Hello. Me again. Have you tried to encode piano solo? Noticed high bitrate Opus gave? And there's also artefact at 15kHz which wasn't in the original audio. Visible with Spek program. Download FLAC and Opus both files, new link: http://www.filedropper.com/example_3 FLAC full: 1084 kbps; FLAC solo: 465 kbps. with --bitrate 160: Opus full: 158 kbps; Opus solo: 190 kbps. Included also Spek

Hello, Ok, I will post them in a folder on Google Drive and will give the link on my blog page, -because among other things, on my blog page, I can not display 2 bitmap 512x512 images side by side-... Hope it is ok! Cheers, Raphael 2018-07-15 1:41 GMT+02:00 J.B. Nicholson <jbn at forestfield.org>: > Raphael Canut wrote: > >> I downloaded 20 images from the Internet with

Hello, First I have added a link on my demo blog page to Google Drive for the image comparison folder of NHW and x265 on rather good quality images.But be sure, as soon as you have sent me a free alternative host, I will upload there too! Link (for now) on: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ Do not hesitate to let me know if you would share the opinion that NHW is globally better than x265 (HEVC) at

> You don't. Audio CDs don't support ReplayGain tags. The only thing > you may do on Audio CDs is to use Volume Normalize techniques > available on certain programs. Normalization of sound is not a good, > clean thing, though. Surely it would be possible to have something apply the ReplayGain to the WAV after decoding and prior to writing them to CD... but I don't know

Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it

Hello all, I have read FLAC stores a hashsum inside its files to check their integrity. But how to do it without having to extract the file? Is the hashsum calcu- lated on the extracted or compressed data? Thanks in advance, Anton

Dear all, I am an active FLAC user and like the program a lot! Thanks for your great work. Since I am not a developer I cannot modify the program on my own. Maybe you might be interested in features I would find useful. Maybe others find them interesting as well and you find the time to implement them. 1. Add encoder options: a) Skip silence (leading and ending) would give the option to skip

Hello everyone, I'm new to this flac thing (started about a week ago) but I have read a lot about flac and replaygain. As far as I understand it, replaygain is lossless in the sense that I can tell my player to ignore the settings or I can even use foobar2000 to remove the tags entirely, hence getting back to the original audio. If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000

Also, don't forget the option I gave you Ralph, where you can have access to one of my VPSes. We can create a subdomain for free, but if you want something like nhw.com, you'd have to register the domain name yourself, which wouldn't cost too much money.... Then I can help configure it to point to your page on my VPS. I'll host it all for free. You'll have your own user

On Aug 8, 2009, at 23:11, Didier Dambrin wrote: > Electronic music quite often doesn't leave a computer these days. > And it > mainly consists of drums, synths & vocals/effects. Drums are often > samples > sequenced at sample (not sub-sample) accuracy, thus repeated (of > course if > the song was post-resampled, there will be sub-sample times). Good point. I

For the interested, the Phatbox (a car audio system) now has firmware to support FLAC files. I have a news bullet on the FLAC site: http://flac.sourceforge.net/news.html#20020213 This is the first hardware support for FLAC (more is coming) and I think the first support of any non-proprietary lossless audio format for any hardware. Kudos to Phatnoise for taking the lead. Josh

Hi All, What is the status of the oggpcm project? I'm investigation solutions to the following problem: losslessly encode double-precision mutli-channel timeseries data in a format that is compatible with free (libre) internet streaming technologies and that permits diverse metadata to be encoded with the stream. flac isn't suitable because it only supports integer data, lossy

i am looking for a theora video editor do yous know of any? Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail

> Steve Lhomme wrote: > > You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now their > samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like open > and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder). I've thought of doing lossy compression before on instruments, but I'd much rather stick to lossless, at least for now. There are issues to be sorted out

Hello, I noticed that kbps jumps quite high in -q 10 mode and is nearing lossless compressors. Would it be a difficult task to make OGG a lossless compressor at -q 10? I don't know much about lossy/lossless compression internal logic, so excuse me if my question is out of place. But this would be a really nice feature that would make OGG an "all in one" tool. Cheers, Bostjan

I am interetsed to know views on how does best quality ogg compression compare with SHN or whether this is this really comparing apples with oranges because SHN does not compress that greatly? I am on a Music list that is doing a Tape Tree. I guess Grateful dead have made SHN the cult leader format. -- Raena Lea-Shannon --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg