similar to: Replay-gain

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor

> You don't. Audio CDs don't support ReplayGain tags. The only thing > you may do on Audio CDs is to use Volume Normalize techniques > available on certain programs. Normalization of sound is not a good, > clean thing, though. Surely it would be possible to have something apply the ReplayGain to the WAV after decoding and prior to writing them to CD... but I don't know

Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it

I mention metaflac because there are a few shell scripts that use it to write RG tags in a flac music library on Linux. With support for Ebu R128 gain in metaflac (the calculation according to specification, not an external program) it would be easy to use, just change the cmd line for metaflac in the script. Now that metaflac supports sample rates higher than 48kHz this would be a good thing in

1) changelog.html "Add ability to handle utf8 filenames on Windows (large set of patches from Janne Hyv?rinen)" AFAIK Windows internally uses UTF-16LE, not UTF-8. IMHO it's better to use a general word 'Unicode' instead of 'utf8'. 2) documentation_bugs.html "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.2.1) release:" 1.2.1 is not the current

I have FLAC files that I would like to re-encode with --replay-gain. I have my Flac's organized in Artist/Album folders, so I should have no problem getting an album gain/peak per album. Do I need to first de-code the flac's to wav files and then "flac --replay-gain *.wav", or can this be accomplished by going to each Album directory and "flac -f --replay-gain

>The use of R128 also raises the question about "REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS" >tag. Currently flac/metaflac writes "REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB" >but doesn't use it when decoding (it seems that nothing uses this tag). >R128 defines reference level differently, so this tag makes little sense for >it. IMHO it's better not to write this tag when

I just bought an I Audio mobile device (Btw, these thigns are the coolest players on the face of the earth.. might want to check em out). It plays ogg vorbis files rather nicely. My whole music library is sitting in flac format. When I encoded my flac files (the majority a year ago) I used replay gain to save the album and track information if the flac file. Unfortunately, the I audio doesnt like

Hi has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain? Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140615/1c1ca9c9/attachment.htm

I'm currently using CDex with the string: -8 -V -T artist="%a" -T album="%b" -T title="%t" -T date="%y" -T tracknumber="%tn" -T genre="%g" --replay-gain -o "%2" "%1" but I decided I don't need/want ReplayGain since I can't stand how low (quiet) it plays. Funny thing is I edited the RG part

This implementation uses decimation to generate an estimate of the required ReplayGain adjustment for tracks sampled at high rates. This approach avoids having to generate filters with commensurately more taps, and also the subsequent effect on performance as these additional taps are evaluated for high sample rate tracks. Filter table entries with coefficients that are unchanged are marked /*

Erik ? ? Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token `then' ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: `? then' Do both /bin/bash and /bin/dash give exactly the same error message ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew

Erik, I cannot reproduce the problem you see with either dash(1) or bash(1). > test case62: --import-picture-from... OK > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 12000 (12000 x 1) ... OK >

I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me to a few quesitons: 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play flac files? I have an old P100 I would like to use for the task if it is sufficient. 2. When

Using Linux (Kubuntu) using the application "crip" ripping at -q 10 & using replaygain on for volume control -------------------------------------------- Now that I have 2000 .ogg files... first problem: There is NOT one Portable CD Player on the Market, that can play encoded .ogg files AND read the replaygain tags. via a cd-r second problem: Burning... if I am going to burn a

Copy additional filter values from Foobar2000 as found in <http://code.google.com/p/sirens2/source/browse/trunk/libwavpack-4.32.psp/wvgain.c?r=32> to allow metaflac to perform gain analysis on high sample rate audio. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120107/018c821b/attachment-0001.htm

Thanks! You've been most informative. Do the command line options vary for album and track or is the album gain computed automatically if it's done on a batch of files? You Wrote: > > there are two tags for replaygain, the 'album' tag which applies > to the whole album, and 'track' tag for each track.

I have read some posts about using FLAC to archive CD collections and would like to get some feedback. I am torn between creating a bin and cue file with CDDB info and compressing that down with FLAC as a single file or the second method of ripping all the files out to wav and converting to FLAC and maybe saving the cue file in attempt to use it later. The first method I believe will pretty much

have linux install on my laptop, and decide to clean up my music collection, found allot of my music that has replaygain tags, and allot don't. How would I fix the ones that don't have any replaygain tags, ? have flac and flac123 ogg ogg123 vorbistools and vorbisgain..etc, all installed, can play music fine, but when I hit a song, that doesn't have replaygain tags, need to turn down

The test is rather simple, and only compares the computed output values for a 1kHz signal at the known filter table sampling frequencies with previously obained golden values. As such, the test only verifies that the performance of the replay gain analyser has not changed. A better test would be to compare the computed value with an independently obtain theorectical value. This is possible by