similar to: Shorewall.net back on line

Hi, Have someone there tried the TDM 2400 with 24 FXO? Have had echo problems? or any other problem ? Recommendations? Optional echo cancellation modules are necessary? TIA, Fernando

Wow ! No reply... May be I must talk about X100P instead of X101P ? Is someone has yet encountered this kind of "no sound" problem when bridging two FXO lines like this (first as input, second as output) ? Any idea ? TIA. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois BERGERET" <f6hqz-m@hamwlan.net> To: "Asterisk Users

Hello All, I am trying to figure out which way to go for a quad port fxo solution with a good echo can on it. My options are the sangoma remora, a mediatrix fxo, or something similar. The issue is that I would need a good EC. This would be on about a 9000 foot loop, and the lines don't function well on a spa-3000 or zaptel tdm 4 port card. Anyone have experience that drives them in a

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3115 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060323/c0928576/smime.bin

Hello all, I'm using Wildcard TE410P card. Here is a zaptel.cfg loadzone=se defaultzone=se span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=32-46 dchan=47 bchan=48-62 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=63-77 dchan=78 bchan=79-93 span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=94-108 dchan=109 bchan=110-124 # ztcfg -vvv Zaptel Configuration ====================== SPAN 1:

I''v finished the french translation of the QuickStart Guides named "Basic two-interface firewall" As i''v not found the email of Tom Eastep i post this news here. I''m translating now the "Standalone", and after i will do the "Three interface" If there is some french guys here, may be they can read to find some errors ?! :) cya -- VETSEL

I thought I read somewhere that you no longer have to do a special make command for the 2.6 kernel. Is this true, or should I still make linux26? I'm having problems getting anything zaptel to load properly. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I get the following errors when starting Asterisk. == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found Feb 19 21:14:35 WARNING[10440]: chan_zap.c:920 zt_open: Unable to specify channel 1: No such device Feb 19 21:14:35 ERROR[10440]: chan_zap.c:6860 mkintf: Unable to open channel 1: No such device here = 0, tmp->channel = 1, channel = 1 Feb 19 21:14:35

Dear All, I am not sure if this is the right place to ask my question but I can't find a newsgroup or support for this app_RPT concept so I hope if some one in this community who have tried it out could help me out. I studied this application requirments and saw the hardware needed they describe a radio quad which uses RJ 45 but I can't see where the RJ goes in order to be able to

I am looking for completly wireless desktop phones. Until I realized we needed wireless i was going to use polycom soundpoint 501's. Any suggestions on a comparable wireless phone? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070328/88e22671/attachment.htm

I finally got Solaris to successfully make asterisk, using these instructions: http://sunfreeware.com/programlistsparc10.html#gcc33 Now though, when I issue the make install, I get this error: mkdir -p /var/opt/asterisk/spool/system mkdir -p /var/opt/asterisk/spool/tmp mkdir -p /var/opt/asterisk/spool/meetme install -m 755 asterisk /opt/asterisk/usr/sbin/ install: asterisk was not found

Sorry if this is a daft question but when a PSTN call comes in on my X100P the console shows the following; NOTICE[1217602880]: File chan_zap.c, Line 4456 (ss_thread): Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)... NOTICE[1217602880]: File chan_zap.c, Line 4456 (ss_thread): Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)... NOTICE[1217602880]: File chan_zap.c, Line 4456 (ss_thread): Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)...

Rafa³ Dutko has just discovered a potentially serious bug in version 1.3.0 and 1.3.1. In both versions, where an interface option appears on multiple interfaces, the option may only be applied to the first interface on which it appears. A corrected firewall script for 1.3.1 is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.3.1/firewall and

Shorewall 1.3.9 is available. In this release: 1. DNS Names are now allowed in Shorewall config files (I still recommend against using them however). 2. The connection SOURCE may now be qualified by both interface and IP address in a Shorewall rule. 3. Shorewall startup is now disabled after initial installation until the file /etc/shorewall/startup_disabled is removed. 4. The

Hi, To solve echo problems, I'm considering 2 alternatives. 1> Sangoma A104d - I can't find support for asterisk 1.2.1 2> Desktop echo canceller - http://www.oriontelecom.com/echo_canceller/desktop/e1_ec_desktop.html - I want to know where to buy and price. Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks. Jason. p.s. : asterisk cli command "reload" can change rx_gain and

does anyone know how to enable the "udp loose" function in kernel 2.4.x? one of my fave games requires this to work on the net and i''d really like to move away from the 2.2 series kernels. tia

This will be the last Shorewall release for a while as I''m going to be focusing on Documentation. In this release: 1. Empty and invalid source and destination qualifiers are now detected in the rules file. It is a good idea to use the ''shorewall check'' command before you issue a ''shorewall restart'' command be be sure that you don''t

This is a minor release of Shorewall. In this release: 1. A "shorewall try" command has been added. This command attempts to restart Shorewall using an alternate configuration and if that attempt fails, Shorewall is automatically started with the default configuration. This is useful for remote administration where a failed restart of Shorewall can leave you isolated from

Let me know if there are any problems. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY & stability of the