similar to: Strange things happening at SourceForge

> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org. Perhaps consider to remove >> the downloads from

On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the >> original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that. > > Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since 2009 > or so. > > Erik I meant who is registered as project

As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh memories, I?d leave them out of the actual changelog. * Improved efficiency of 24 bit decoding. (https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ea0d5ddadc6902e873983c89f473130b3bb6625f) *

Nice work on getting flac 1.3.1 out! Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. However, if for instance the OS X binary is just around the corner it would makes sense to wait for that. Will the 1.3.1 binaries also be uploaded to the

In this topic on Hydrogen Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain. The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since Commit http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=0554a4aee6966bc5b251364753ef85de72dfab19 because as of 1.3.0 FLAC supports Replaygain with many

On 24 Nov 2014, at 10:13, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of >> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might >> as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh >> memories, I?d leave them out of the

I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ?decoder compliance test corpus? and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes). I seem to recall someone on this list (most likely lvqcl or Martijn van Beurden) mentioning something about

Dear Customer Service, My name is Tamamura and I am in charge of Audio-Technica. I want to be able to play FLAC using the API that BT IC has. I use BT IC that other companies have released. In this case, Do I need to get permission from you? Best regards Minoru tamamura ==================================================== 〒915-0003 福井県越前市戸谷町87-1 (株)オーディオテクニカフクイ　技術部 　　　第3技術課　玉村　実 TEL：0778-25-6700

Hi Erik, I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older ones are useful to consider including: Fixed a segmentation fault in libFLAC http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/425/ Changed the LPC order guess for a slight compression improvement,

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Florent B wrote: > Have you read this article from ars technica ? > > http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/10/how-the-nsa-can-break-trillions-of-encrypted-web-and-vpn-connections/ Yes. > What I understand is that 1024-bits Diffie-Hellman keys are broken by NSA. More precisely, they can spend a lot of effort to break Diffie-Hellman for a

I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. Olav Sunde At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl wrote: >>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries

On 12/6/16, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. > > I had sort of hoped I'd finished :). Seems I was wrong! > >> I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although >> admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these

I've been talking to some people about benchmarks for different operating systems and CPUs, and it would seem that a good way to gain some exposure for Ogg Vorbis would be to push oggenc as a benchmarking application when sites such as ExtremeTech, AnandTech, Ars Technica, etc. post system comparisons. I know that MP3 encoding is used as a common "media" benchmark, so it would be

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > > > Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page > > https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads > > on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. > > I changed the link to point to: > > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/ >

http://philosecurity.org/2009/01/12/interview-with-an-adware-author The inherent insecurity of Windows is deeply frightening. I hope we don't emulate it *too* well. - d.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/03/19/apple-putting-llvm-to-good-use Mentions last week's Bossa Conference.

If I recall correctly, with the release of 1.3.1 there were a few days between the version being released and the News and Changelog appearing on the site. This caused a number of sites to report the release without mentioning all the improvements in the update. Can I suggest that this time we publish the Changelog and News update immediately after uploading the final version? The Changelog is

Are there any patches (or planned updates) to rsync v3.0.6 to handle the HFS+ File Compression that Apple introduced with Snow Leopard?

> Post the exact command and the error message. [root at Test1 ocfs2-1.3.9]# ./configure checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu ... [root at Test1 ocfs2-1.3.9]# make .... make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5-x86_64' make[1]: Leaving directory `/config/ocfs2-1.3.9/fs' make -C vendor make[1]:

Hi Everyone, I'm currently using the latest build of R and R-Studio server (both are amazing products) I'm still very new to this but I came across this issue: I'm trying to do a select from postgres and put the data into and xts object like so: # Libs library('RPostgreSQL') # http://code.google.com/p/rpostgresql/ library('quantmod') library('TTR')