similar to: Important: 2.0.2d and 2.0.2e users

In the Shorewall/ CVS project: Problems Corrected: 1) There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" in the documentation and configuration files. 2) The description of NEWNOTSYN in

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Problems Corrected since version 1.4.8: 1) There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" in the documentation and

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-2.0.0 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-2.0.0 -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Fixes the problem reported by Dick Hollenbeck in which capabilities are mis-detected when kernel module autoloading is disabled. Available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-2.0.2d ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-2.0.2d and at other mirrors shortly. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

If you are interested in helping with testing new features, please look at http://shorewall.net/netmap.html. If you have a need for this type of network-level address mapping and/or are in a position to test it please let me know. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

This should be it. Thanks to Francesca Smith, this RC also includes samples. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

This is a rollup of the fix for LOG rules in actions. If you are not having that problem (two netfilter logging rules are generated by the LOG target in an action) then there is no need to upgrade to this release. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

It has been asserted that the use of CVS for maintaining the Shorewall documentation has been a barrier to community participation. To test this theory, Alex Martin has created a Wiki (http://wiki.rettc.com/wiki.phtml?title=Wiki_Shorewall_FAQ) and with the help of Mike Noyes Alex has populated the Wiki with the Shorewall FAQ. Feedback is welcome. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a

Through the efforts of Fransecsa Smith, the sample configurations have once again been updated to include changes in the latest Shorewall release. As always Francesca, thanks! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Ok -- I''m wearing the brown bag tonight (I''ve airmailed one to Tuomas as well :-) ). The IPTABLES patch had some problems when IPTABLES was not set in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. Beta 6 fixes those (I hope) and also corrects a rather obscure problem with "shorewall add" when the "mss" option appears in /etc/shorewall/ipsec. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \

Hello, I leave for a couple days .. (Well months) and look at what has happened. :-) I would throw my support in behind Xoops .. to be honest .. If a portal is what we are trying to achieve here. I just happen to think that sometimes .. More work goes into web design etc than goes into actual Code. But thats because I am a lamer at web design :-) I am coming in here a bit late .. But tell

Dear contributors I have tried this experiment: x<-c() for (i in 1:12){ x[i]<-list(cbind(x1[i],x2[i])) #this is a list of 12 couples of time series I am using to perform a test } # that compares them 2 by 2 # ################# #trace statistic test<-data.frame() cval<-array( , dim=c(2,3,12)) for (i in 2:12){ for (k in 1:2){ for (j in 1:3){ result[k,j,i]<-

Graeme Boyle has contributed a nice description of his Corporate Network Shorewall environment. You can find it at http://shorewall.net/CorpNetwork.htm Thanks Graeme! -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Shorewall 1.4.9 is now available. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 Unless something urgent comes up, this will be the last release of Shorewall 1.x. Release notes are attached. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

Hi, I am trying to find a function to match two data frames of different lengths for one field only. So, for example, df1 is: Name Position location francesca A 75 cristina B 36 And df2 is: location Country 75 UK 56 Austria And I would like to match on "Location" and the output to be something like: Name Position Location Match francesca A 75 1 cristina B 36 0 I have tried with

Hiya, > You would look on the Webmin site for that. I have absolutely nothing > to > do with the development or support of the Webmin Shorewall module. The > development of the Webmin Shorewall module does not track the > development of Shorewall so it is very unlikely that you will ever > find > a Webmin module that supports the current Shorewall version > completely.

Dear Contributors, thanks for collaboration. I am trying to reorganize data frame, that looks like this: n1.Index Date PX_LAST n2.Index Date.1 PX_LAST.1 n3.Index Date.2 PX_LAST.2 1 NA 04/02/07 1.34 NA 04/02/07 1.36 NA 04/02/07 1.33 2 NA 04/09/07 1.34 NA 04/09/07

Maybe this was your solution? blocC <- c(rep(x=c(1:13), times=84)) blocC <- arrange(.data = data.frame(blocC), blocC) The second line sorts, but that may not be needed depending on application. The object class is also different in the sorted solution. Tim -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Francesca PANCOTTO via R-help Sent:

Although Shorewall provides safeguards against it, people seem to regularly shoot themselves in the foot when doing remote system administration. I''ve been thinking about this problem and wonder if a change to the way that "shorewall stop" behaves might help. Today, "shorewall stop" stops all traffic except to/from those destinations listed in

I just installed 1.9.2 on my 2nd machine, but after I installed I checked the version with ruby -v and it sent me 1.8.7 Here''s the terminal output...anyone know what''s wrong (I have RVM installed): Francescas-MacBook-Air:~ fkrihely$ rvm install 1.9.2 Fetching yaml-0.1.4.tar.gz to /Users/fkrihely/.rvm/archives Extracting yaml-0.1.4.tar.gz to /Users/fkrihely/.rvm/src Configuring