similar to: Support 28kHz, 56kHz and 112kHz gain analysis

Copy additional filter values from Foobar2000 as found in <http://code.google.com/p/sirens2/source/browse/trunk/libwavpack-4.32.psp/wvgain.c?r=32> to allow metaflac to perform gain analysis on high sample rate audio. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120107/018c821b/attachment-0001.htm

Erik, I cannot reproduce the problem you see with either dash(1) or bash(1). > test case62: --import-picture-from... OK > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 12000 (12000 x 1) ... OK >

This implementation uses decimation to generate an estimate of the required ReplayGain adjustment for tracks sampled at high rates. This approach avoids having to generate filters with commensurately more taps, and also the subsequent effect on performance as these additional taps are evaluated for high sample rate tracks. Filter table entries with coefficients that are unchanged are marked /*

Erik ? ? Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token `then' ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: `? then' Do both /bin/bash and /bin/dash give exactly the same error message ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew

If anyone is interested, I smushed the less than 0 quality rate setting into oggdrop. The diff is below. Alan <p><p>Index: encthread.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/win32-tools/oggdrop/encthread.c,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -r1.9 encthread.c 117,118c117,118 < if (quality < 0) < quality = 1; ---

The test is rather simple, and only compares the computed output values for a 1kHz signal at the known filter table sampling frequencies with previously obained golden values. As such, the test only verifies that the performance of the replay gain analyser has not changed. A better test would be to compare the computed value with an independently obtain theorectical value. This is possible by

Sorry about the duplicate posts from Earl Chew. He's resent because the first v3 patch got caught in the moderation queue, and I didn't notice when I released the messages. Not his fault. :-) -r

On 12 January 2012 16:07, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > However, it looks like I'm changing jobs soon and should have two > weeks free between finishing one and starting the other. Good thing you've got time off work so you can get work done! Shall I harass you about your patch queue at LCA? -r

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote:

Erik, I'm using bash.? Before I alter the syntax, what shell are you using ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:16:11 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > There is

On 25-04-13 05:30, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > The problem is that the failure in the awk script isn't recognised as > a failure in the shell script. No, really, it's not only that. With the fixed git, I get this when I change one of the expected values to something else: > [...] > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1)

Hi, I have a set of data (total number of record = 144,122), and I would like to use gamma-glm with log link to set up a model. IC is number of records IL is paid amount The table below shows that I have 30.578% of the data in the level of "1 - 1000" paid amount 20.320% of the data in the level of "1001 - 2000" paid amount and so on My question is could i use the whole data

Hello, I installed Icecast 2.4.3 by downloading http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/icecast/icecast-2.4.3.tar.gz CentOS 7 Then ./configure make make install Its working. My only issue : I have 3 streams, I see the name of my station 3 times in Icecast directory. I tryed to hide 2 streams by using the hidden and public tags and force showing the total of audiance in the one public stream. i

Hi all, In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for the regain play analysis code. The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html simply adds some more higher sample rates. The second by Earl Chew: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html is more comprehensive. Neither of the

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Farid BENAMROUCHE <fariouche at yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm using gentoo, with kernel 3.17.0-p1-pf and at some point, a patch was included in this branch of the gentoo kernel that broke hdmi audio. > > I've checked with the latest 3.19 vanilla kernel, and I still have the same problem. I cannot output multichannel sound over

Hi there. I noticed that the speex.org website does not appear to give a table of what bitrates you can expect when using the SPEEX codec in CBR (quality) mode. I have created a table for all modes, giving the bitrate for two cases. a) all coded frames saved consecutively in bitstream b) all coded frames saved with byte alignment You can see there is significant padding loss at some (lower)

Thank You, It means vmovdqa64 zmm22, zmmword ptr [rip + .LCPI0_0] # zmm22 = [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] zmm22 will contain 64 bit constant values which are indexes here zmm22=8, 9, 10, 11, 12,13,14,15. not the values loaded from these locations. and zmm2 contains constant 4000. so, vpmuludq zmm14, zmm10, zmm2 ; will multiply the indexes values with 4000, as for array b the stride is 4000. zmm14=

Hi All, I am trying to get the opus codec working with linphone. I followed the instructions... This shows me its loaded core show translation paths opus --- Translation paths SRC Codec "opus" sample rate 48000 --- opus:48000 To g723:8000 : No Translation Path opus:48000 To ulaw:8000 : (opus at 48000)->(slin at 48000 )->(slin at

Hello Ben, The working kernel code I based my investigation was a 1.3.17 + gentoo patch (so yes, pretty old) The new one below, not working is the vanilla 3.19 (from the gentoo repo, should be identical to the latest 3.19 stable) I've narrowed down the issue to the size of the eld. The new patch (that indeed uses drm_eld_size) (with this patch, I have a working 3.19 kernel): I will need to

Josh, Sure. I can try. Would you give me a more detailed description of the requirement ? What exactly does "general MM:SS handling" mean ? Earl ________________________________ From: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> To: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com>; "flac-dev at xiph.org" <flac-dev at xiph.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 8:25:34 PM Subject: Re: