Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Reg. I/O callbacks."
2005 Oct 06
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:14, Josh Coalson wrote:
> but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host
> order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get
> them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like:
>
> FLAC__int32 * LChannel = buffer[0];
> short TempSource = (short)LChannel[LPos];
>
> instead of
>
> LChannel =
2005 Oct 25
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you., I was working on something
else and just now got FLAC to work.
Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise
happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that it'll
be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if there are any ARM specific
optimizations that can be done. The processor is a 166MHz processor. Do
2005 Sep 30
2
Reg. FLAC decoding
I'm using seekable_stream_decoder, And., this is my write_callback. I'm
not getting the required output. The PCM i get is not the proper music.
Am I doing something wrong here?
FLAC__StreamDecoderWriteStatus
AFLACStreamPlayer::StreamWriteCb (
const FLAC__SeekableStreamDecoder *decoder,
const FLAC__Frame *frame,
const FLAC__int32 * const buffer[],
void *client_data)
{
int Channels,
2005 Oct 25
1
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:04, Josh Coalson wrote:
> we don't have any ARM optimizations yet, just x86 and ppc. but
> yes, FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() will give the most bang for the
> buck and is the easiest (it's just a multiply-accumulate-shift
> loop).
Aw., I dont think I can look into this right now. However, I have some
doubts.
Is it possible for the
2005 Sep 30
0
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
I can't be totally sure what 'short' is on your platform, but if
it's (probably) 16-bits, it looks like you're treating the samples
in buffer[] as packed 16 bit numbers.
but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host
order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get
them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like:
FLAC__int32 *
2005 Nov 10
0
Reg. decode time
I need to get the current decode time., and the total time of the
stream. How do i do this?
--
Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/)
Z500 Development team (http://www.z500series.com/)
Terminus Graphics Studios
http://www.terminus.in/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a
2005 Jan 22
3
Stand alone media player supporting Ogg ?
1. Anyone know of an Ogg playing media player, similar to the Netgear MP101
or the Voyetra AudioTron-100 (neither of which play ogg) ?
I need something that will display and play/stream ogg audio files stored on
the PC, without having to use a tv as the viewer. I looked on the wiki but
didn't find anything. If they don't use a tv they don't play ogg, so far
anyway.
Voyetra
2005 Oct 25
0
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
--- Joe Steeve <joesteeve@zodiactorp.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you., I was working on
> something
> else and just now got FLAC to work.
>
> Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise
> happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that
> it'll
> be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if
2011 Jul 09
1
ldapsam:trusted=yes, 'user in passdb, but getpwnam() fails'
Hello all,
I am working with samba-3.5.6 on Debian Squeeze.
From the smb.conf(5), I assumed that, by using 'ldapsam:trusted=yes',
one can avoid touching the NSS/PAM configuration. However, I am getting a:
user in passdb, but getpwnam() fails
in the logs. Is my assumption wrong?
Regards,
Joe
--
.o. I'm a Free man. I use Free Software.
..o
ooo http://www.joesteeve.org/
2009 Sep 07
6
Question about Server Authentication
Hi guys,
I'm working on a project which concern SSH and there is something i don't understand about server authentication. So I explain my problem:
- When you authorize only RSA keys in the sshd_config on the server, you need to have the RSA public key of this server in the known_hosts file of the client. This is absolutely normal.
- When you authorize only DSA keys in the sshd_config
2007 Sep 19
2
function on factors - how best to proceed
Sorry about this one being long, and I apologise beforehand if there
is something obvious here that I have missed. I am new to creating my
own functions in R, and I am uncertain of how they work.
I have a data set that I have read into a data frame:
> gctable[1:5,]
refseq geometry X60_origin X60_terminus length kingdom
1 NC_009484 cir 1790000 773000 3389227 Bacteria
2
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.36
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the
following errors that do not seem to be important...
Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2015 Jan 02
4
Lost hotmail
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote:
> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ]
> >
> > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick
> > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the
2012 Apr 30
3
95% confidence interval of the coefficients from a bootstrap analysis
Hello,
I am doing a simple linear regression analysis that includes few variables.
I am using a bootstrap analysis to obtain the variation of my variables to
replacement.
I am trying to obtain the coefficients 95% confidence interval from the
bootstrap procedure.
Here is my script for the bootstrap:
N = length (data_Pb[,1])
B = 10000
stor.r2 = rep(0,B)
stor.r2 = rep(0,B)
stor.inter =
2016 Mar 27
1
I stopped receiving mails from the list.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux
<syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote:
>> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
>> > > I
2014 Dec 22
2
trouble building 6.03
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote:
> > sudo apt-get install build-essential
> > sudo apt-get build-dep gcc-multilib
> > sudo apt-get install gcc-multilib
> >
> > sudo apt-get install nasm
> > sudo apt-get install uuid-dev
> >
> > I run
> > #make spotless
> > #make
> >
> > but it
2015 Jan 03
0
Lost hotmail
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:
>> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote:
>> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ]
>> >
>> > For some
2014 Dec 27
0
Lost hotmail WAS: trouble building 6.03
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote:
> > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ]
>
> For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick
> Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the first reply sent by Geert in
> order to actually reply to the OP...
What is visible in the
2016 Mar 27
3
I stopped receiving mails from the list.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote:
> On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> > I stopped receiving e-mails from the list.
> > is there anything I can do?
>
> Does this bounce? Is there a still an issue with Yahoo! or not? At least things are delivered.
Just a few days ago
2005 Apr 07
1
Bug#303661: logcheck-database: openntpd rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.37
Severity: normal
Hello again,
openntpd gives messages like these failry often:
Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid
Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid
I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info
for me.