similar to: Reg. I/O callbacks.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Reg. I/O callbacks."

2005 Oct 06
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:14, Josh Coalson wrote: > but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host > order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get > them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like: > > FLAC__int32 * LChannel = buffer[0]; > short TempSource = (short)LChannel[LPos]; > > instead of > > LChannel =
2005 Oct 25
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you., I was working on something else and just now got FLAC to work. Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that it'll be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if there are any ARM specific optimizations that can be done. The processor is a 166MHz processor. Do
2005 Sep 30
2
Reg. FLAC decoding
I'm using seekable_stream_decoder, And., this is my write_callback. I'm not getting the required output. The PCM i get is not the proper music. Am I doing something wrong here? FLAC__StreamDecoderWriteStatus AFLACStreamPlayer::StreamWriteCb ( const FLAC__SeekableStreamDecoder *decoder, const FLAC__Frame *frame, const FLAC__int32 * const buffer[], void *client_data) { int Channels,
2005 Oct 25
1
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:04, Josh Coalson wrote: > we don't have any ARM optimizations yet, just x86 and ppc. but > yes, FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() will give the most bang for the > buck and is the easiest (it's just a multiply-accumulate-shift > loop). Aw., I dont think I can look into this right now. However, I have some doubts. Is it possible for the
2005 Sep 30
0
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
I can't be totally sure what 'short' is on your platform, but if it's (probably) 16-bits, it looks like you're treating the samples in buffer[] as packed 16 bit numbers. but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like: FLAC__int32 *
2005 Nov 10
0
Reg. decode time
I need to get the current decode time., and the total time of the stream. How do i do this? -- Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/) Z500 Development team (http://www.z500series.com/) Terminus Graphics Studios http://www.terminus.in/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a
2005 Jan 22
3
Stand alone media player supporting Ogg ?
1. Anyone know of an Ogg playing media player, similar to the Netgear MP101 or the Voyetra AudioTron-100 (neither of which play ogg) ? I need something that will display and play/stream ogg audio files stored on the PC, without having to use a tv as the viewer. I looked on the wiki but didn't find anything. If they don't use a tv they don't play ogg, so far anyway. Voyetra
2005 Oct 25
0
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
--- Joe Steeve <joesteeve@zodiactorp.com> wrote: > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you., I was working on > something > else and just now got FLAC to work. > > Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise > happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that > it'll > be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if
2011 Jul 09
1
ldapsam:trusted=yes, 'user in passdb, but getpwnam() fails'
Hello all, I am working with samba-3.5.6 on Debian Squeeze. From the smb.conf(5), I assumed that, by using 'ldapsam:trusted=yes', one can avoid touching the NSS/PAM configuration. However, I am getting a: user in passdb, but getpwnam() fails in the logs. Is my assumption wrong? Regards, Joe -- .o. I'm a Free man. I use Free Software. ..o ooo http://www.joesteeve.org/
2009 Sep 07
6
Question about Server Authentication
Hi guys, I'm working on a project which concern SSH and there is something i don't understand about server authentication. So I explain my problem: - When you authorize only RSA keys in the sshd_config on the server, you need to have the RSA public key of this server in the known_hosts file of the client. This is absolutely normal. - When you authorize only DSA keys in the sshd_config
2007 Sep 19
2
function on factors - how best to proceed
Sorry about this one being long, and I apologise beforehand if there is something obvious here that I have missed. I am new to creating my own functions in R, and I am uncertain of how they work. I have a data set that I have read into a data frame: > gctable[1:5,] refseq geometry X60_origin X60_terminus length kingdom 1 NC_009484 cir 1790000 773000 3389227 Bacteria 2
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2015 Jan 02
4
Lost hotmail
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the
2012 Apr 30
3
95% confidence interval of the coefficients from a bootstrap analysis
Hello, I am doing a simple linear regression analysis that includes few variables. I am using a bootstrap analysis to obtain the variation of my variables to replacement. I am trying to obtain the coefficients 95% confidence interval from the bootstrap procedure. Here is my script for the bootstrap: N = length (data_Pb[,1]) B = 10000 stor.r2 = rep(0,B) stor.r2 = rep(0,B) stor.inter =
2016 Mar 27
1
I stopped receiving mails from the list.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> > > I
2014 Dec 22
2
trouble building 6.03
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > sudo apt-get install build-essential > > sudo apt-get build-dep gcc-multilib > > sudo apt-get install gcc-multilib > > > > sudo apt-get install nasm > > sudo apt-get install uuid-dev > > > > I run > > #make spotless > > #make > > > > but it
2015 Jan 03
0
Lost hotmail
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some
2014 Dec 27
0
Lost hotmail WAS: trouble building 6.03
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the first reply sent by Geert in > order to actually reply to the OP... What is visible in the
2016 Mar 27
3
I stopped receiving mails from the list.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > I stopped receiving e-mails from the list. > > is there anything I can do? > > Does this bounce? Is there a still an issue with Yahoo! or not? At least things are delivered. Just a few days ago
2005 Apr 07
1
Bug#303661: logcheck-database: openntpd rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.37 Severity: normal Hello again, openntpd gives messages like these failry often: Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info for me.