similar to: flac-1.1.1 completely broken on linux/ppc and on macosx if built with the standard toolchain (not xcode)

I've had this a long time but haven't submitted it yet. I've tried to mirror the ia32 setup, so there should be a new subdirectory src/libFLAC/ppc . The first two attachments go there. The third is a context diff for src/libFLAC/Makefile.am . I have some more modified files, which I figured I'd submit after the above are checked in and working for somebody other than me. If you

Hi all, I'm trying to compile the flac-1.1.1 tarball on a Linux PPC system (a G3 iBook running Debian Testing). Configure is fine, but make bombs out almost immediately with: lpc_asm.s: Assembler messages: lpc_asm.s:1: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `l' lpc_asm.s:2: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `C' lpc_asm.s:4:

Hi, Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not work yet. 1) On OSX, I get: Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c 2) On Linux X86, llc does not give any problem, but I get this while compiling the generated .c file: error: unknown register name 'S' in

At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > > syntactic loops). > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is

On 7/2/2018 3:16 PM, Sanjay Patel wrote: > I also agree that the per-element rotate for vectors is what we want for > this intrinsic. > > So I have this so far: > > declare i32 @llvm.catshift.i32(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %shift_amount) > declare <2 x i32> @llvm.catshift.v2i32(<2 x i32> %a, <2 x i32> %b, <2 x i32> %shift_amount) > > For

I've been working on adding support for a (semi-proprietary) extension for PowerPC called "Paired-Singles". It's a SIMD instruction set supporting various operations on a vector of 2 32-bit floating point numbers. The Extension is found in the PowerPC 750CL, modified variants of it are used in the Nintendo GameCube (Gekko), the Nintendo Wii (Broadway) and the Nintendo Wii U

Hi, there I am writing an backend, and I met a problem. We don't have load/store instructions for vector predicate registers(vpr for short). The hardware has 64 vector registers(vr for short) and 8 vector predicate registers. And there is no move instructions between vr and vpr. vr supports many operations, and vpr supports vpror, vprxor, vprand and vprinv operations. A vr has 512 bits, and

Hi, I am planning to expanding the pseudo instructions in XXXTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(), and use temporary virtual registers as operands. If I use virtual registers, do I need to mark them as "early clobber"? I saw that sometimes they marked virtual register as "early clobber" in EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() in MIPS backend. What is the effect of marking a

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Bram Adams wrote: > Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not > work yet. > 1) On OSX, I get: > > Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function > 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! > > when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c The C backend doesn't support all target-specific intrinsics. > 2) On Linux X86,

Hi Bram, Could you submit bug reports for all of these problems? Thanks! -bw On 5/29/07, Bram Adams <bram.adams at ugent.be> wrote: > Hi, > > Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not > work yet. > > > 1) On OSX, I get: > > Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function > 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! > > when I

> > Okay, I changed the C backend to emit syntactic loops around the real > loops, and it seems to make a big difference. LLVM now generates this > code (note that the actual loop is not actually responsible for control > flow, it's unreachable): > > ... which is exactly what we want. Patrick, I would appreciate it if > you > could rerun your tests on PPC and let

Is there some fast (built-in?) way to get the OR of all the elements in a logical vector? In other words, is there some fast (built-in) version of the function vor below? Thanks. -Ben vor <- function(v) { ans <- v[1] if (length(v) > 1) for (i in 2:length(v)) ans <- ans | v[i] ans }

I''m trying to set a global noop but it doesn''t seem possible, There are 2 bugs open about this which to me look pretty serious as the expected behaviour isn''t the case. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/21286 http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/6549 If anyone has a work around (that doesn''t include modifying puppet.conf file) I would be very

--- common/include/test-tvdiff.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- common/include/tvdiff.h | 13 ++++++- 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/include/test-tvdiff.c b/common/include/test-tvdiff.c index 9cbcfc0..abefb2e 100644 --- a/common/include/test-tvdiff.c +++ b/common/include/test-tvdiff.c @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > syntactic loops). Yup, this is EXACTLY what is going on. I took this very simple C function: int Array[1000]; void test(int

v1 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/thread.html#00361 v2: - Adds a patch to rename the reflection plugin to the info plugin. - Adds tests. Rich.

Hello, I'm making a simple plot using xYplot in the Hmisc library and having problems with labeling the values on the x-axis. Using the reproducible example below, how can I have the text (jan, feb,mar, etc.) in place of 1:12. Thanks, AB x <- c(seq(0,0.5,by=0.1),seq(0.5,0,by=-0.1)) ci <- rnorm(12,0,sd=0.1) xupper <- x + ci xlower <- x - ci mo.fac <- c("jan",

Hi, I am trying to format some data (example matrix "m" below) for which each data point has 2 associated values separated by a comma. I want to replace values <3 with "0" to give the example output below. I have got as far as: out<-lapply(strsplit(m,","),as.numeric) Failed to identify anything along the lines of "[out<3]<-0" that works... Thank

Ok Guillaume, It is Megatec protocol. It sends Q1<cr> and answers with (227.2 227.2 227.2 038 50.1 13.5 25.0 00001001<cr> And if you check http://eu1.networkupstools.org/protocols/megatec.html it matches. And now, ho has time to code ? Kjell fre 2006-04-21 klockan 17:18 +0200 skrev Guillaume JAOUEN: > Hello, > > As I wish to help you the most I can in order to get a