similar to: High CPU usage

Hi Tanmay, >Does compiling speex API with DISABLE_FLOAT_API and DISABLE_VBR solve the >problem? I remember that this fixed the problem. But at that time I also needed VBR so this was not an option. As far as I know, it is related to some calculations that involve float denormals that cause the high CPU usage. Today I'm still using the following code before speex_encoder_init and

Hi Jozsef, this approach sounds interesting. Do have you have some source code available ? Thanks Mark -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Jozsef Vass Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:43 PM To: mark_schilling at gmx.de Cc: speex-dev at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] High CPU usage I have run into the same

Nicer way: void* speexState = speex_encoder_init(&speex_wb_mode); int speexFrameSize, speexRate; speex_encoder_ctl(speexState, SPEEX_GET_FRAME_SIZE, &speexFrameSize); speex_encoder_ctl(speexState, SPEEX_GET_SAMPLING_RATE, &speexRate); SpeexPreprocessState* speexPreprocessState = speex_preprocess_state_init(speexFrameSize, speexRate); Jozsef -----Original Message----- From: Max

What are you trying to accomplish? My code sample was about how Flash Player microphone input in speex. If you want to do decode, please see speexdec.c Jozsef -----Original Message----- From: Max Lapshin [mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:53 AM To: Jozsef Vass Cc: speex-dev at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex in flash player: how to work with? On Sat, Mar

Hi Mark, the documentation (section 3.2.1) states: "The single that will affect the CPU usage of Speex the most is whether it is compiled for floating point or fixed-point. [...] On the x86 architecture, floating-point is generally faster, but not always. " And: "Until the VBR feature is ported to fixed-point, you will also need to configure with ?disable-vbr or define

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Jozsef Vass <jovass at adobe.com> wrote: > Nicer way: > > void* speexState = speex_encoder_init(&speex_wb_mode); > int speexFrameSize, speexRate; > speex_encoder_ctl(speexState, SPEEX_GET_FRAME_SIZE, &speexFrameSize); > speex_encoder_ctl(speexState, SPEEX_GET_SAMPLING_RATE, &speexRate); > SpeexPreprocessState*

Hi, I'm trying to use Speex for real time encoding in an iPhone project but I'm having latency problems. I appreciate any tips you may provide for speeding things up. The recording callback is providing 1024 samples (mono, frequency: 44100 Hz, of type short) every 23 ms (1024.0 / 44100.0). I'm saving the samples in a buffer and use them in the encoding thread (set for mode: wide

Commit 41d351f29528 ("drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait") converted from ttm_bo_wait_ctx() to dma_resv_wait_timeout(). However, dma_resv_wait_timeout() returns greater than zero on success as opposed to ttm_bo_wait_ctx(). As a result, relocs will fail and log errors even when it was a success. Change the return code handling to match that of nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(), which was

Am 15.04.23 um 04:02 schrieb John Ogness: > Commit 41d351f29528 ("drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait") > converted from ttm_bo_wait_ctx() to dma_resv_wait_timeout(). > However, dma_resv_wait_timeout() returns greater than zero on > success as opposed to ttm_bo_wait_ctx(). As a result, relocs > will fail and log errors even when it was a success. > > Change the

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:15:25PM +0100, Tanmay Bhushan wrote: > >From 7eae04667ddaac8baa4812d48ef2c942cedef946 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 22:02:16 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] vdpa: ifcvf: Do proper cleanup if IFCVF init fails > > ifcvf_mgmt_dev leaks memory if it is not freed before > returning.

I don't think it will be easy to identify the problem remotely. You can try logging in with password (if not disabled), or sshing with some other key, or logging into some other user. If you are able to get access to the machine, post the server's error log here. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Jin Li <lijin.abc at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tanmay, > > The server is not

Hi everyone, Just to let you know that version 1.2beta3 is out. The main change is the split into libspeex and libspeexdsp. Basically, libspeex keeps the codec (just like it was for 1.0.x) and libspeexdsp has all the new components. Other changes include a new jitter buffer algorithm and resampler improvements/fixes. This is also the first release where libspeex can be built without any floating

Hi, I''m asking my question here, because I could not find any answer to my problem, but I''m affraid shorewall is not the one to blame. First of all I''m using shorewall version 2.0.15 on two linux box. I set up an ipsec tunnel beetween those 2 boxes to be ables to connect 2 not routable subnetworks. Here is my network topology: 10.66.17.0/24 - 10.66.17.1 = eth0

On 06/07/2013 06:49 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 7 June 2013 08:48, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> When to set which subtarget feature is a policy decision, where I honestly don't have any opinion on for clang. The best is probably to mirror the gcc

Our processor also has some issues regarding the handling of denormals - scalar and vector - and we ran into a related problem only a few days ago. The v3.8 compiler has done a lot of good work on optimisations for floating-point math, but ironically one of them broke our implementation of 'nextafterf'. The desired code fragment (FP32) is: float xAbs = fabsf(x); since we know our

| For programs that have mixed precision requirements for floating point | operations we probably need to do this according to the fast math flags. | Until we get there, a good first step would probably be to provide a | global option similar to -enable-no-infs-fp-math that specifies if | denormals should be allowed or not. This would allow the user to specify | the precision requirements, without

Hi all, I am a newbie here and just started using speex in our lab. During compiling my voice application with windows-compiled version provided today, I am getting "unresolved external symbol _speex_wb_mode". I am probably missing some setting with VS6.0 linker... (I am a bit new to windows too) If anyone could point it out, I would appreciate it. - Tim -----Original Message-----

Hi all, While reviewing a recent clang documentation change, I became aware of an issue with the way that clang is handling FP denormals. There is currently some support for variations in the way denormals are handled, but it isn't consistent across architectures and generally feels kind of half-baked. I'd like to discuss possible solutions to this problem. First, there is a clang

On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 June 2013 08:48, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > When to set which subtarget feature is a policy decision, where I honestly don't have any opinion on for clang. The best is probably to mirror the gcc behavior on linux targets. > > Not really, since GCC has no special

On 06/10/2013 01:56 AM, David Tweed wrote: > | For programs that have mixed precision requirements for floating point > | operations we probably need to do this according to the fast math flags. > | Until we get there, a good first step would probably be to provide a > | global option similar to -enable-no-infs-fp-math that specifies if > | denormals should be allowed or not. This