similar to: from speex user

Hi, I am very glad to enter this mail list. i am a new guy,i am interested in speech coding.so is there anybody working on this ? please contact me,thank you.i am studing on fixed codebook search. and i have read almost all the articals(including patent on this) about codebook search. but i found that all the suboptimize methods have their own flaw. could anybody have some comments on

George Ou wrote: > Ah, but speex.org should lead by example. Instead of posting wav files, why > not post the actual speex files as well? Then make it plaingly obvious for > people to download the plugins with links to the page you just posted. I post wav files for the same reason people have screenshots. Sure, I could download OpenOffice and try it, but it's nice to be able to

Hi, I am running speex wideband for speech. While doing that I am getting Hissing sound during silence. If you want I can give you input and output files. Thanks, Shridhar -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of speex-dev-request@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:30 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Speex-dev

Ok, I made my own sample HTML page and it worked on a vorbis OGG file that I embedded. No need to download a player (other than the directshow filter if it isn't already installed) and no need to download sample. It just played within the browser. I should probably try to release a podcast like this at 16 kbps and see how well it's received. -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc

Hi, all, I am new to this mail list. I have a question here. I just downloaded speex-1.2beta2.tar.gz and wanted to compile it with Visual Studio 2003. but I failed because I can not find the following file: speex-1.2beta2\libspeex\medfilter.c Could any one help me on this? Thanks, -Allen

Hi, Jean-Marc, I have another quick question, I got following message when compile speexdec.exe: Linking... libspeex.lib(sb_celp.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _lpc_window Release/speexdec.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Where does this lpc_window declare? Thanks a lot, -Allen On 8/8/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: >

> - Which is the value of the tail length to get good results? It depends on your setup, but if you do everything carefully, anything from 40ms to 200ms (convert to samples) can work well. > - May I specify some other options (at configuration time or may be at > source) to get the speex AEC lighter, so that I can raise the tail > length and get best results? The tail length is the

Hello speex development team! As I see on http://www.speex.org/downloads/ page, where is no Windows binaries for speex encoder and decoder tools for 1.2beta2 version since no maintainer for it yet. Well, I compiled it from the sources using MSYS environment and MinGW tools (GCC version is 3.4.5). Both libOgg-1.1.3 and speex-1.2beta2 were configured as "./configure

Thank you, I really appreciate the help. -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/07/07 8:34 AM >>> Michael Jacobson a ?crit : > I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, > however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static > arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the >

Please correct me if I am wrong, Jean-Marc, but I do not think that any patches are getting applied to 1.0.5 anyway. Also, if you expect a patch to be applied, you will need to provide the changes as a patch, not as a modified copy of the source tree. The 1.2 branch includes a mechanism for private memory allocation from a static buffer. You provide a usermisc.h file that replaces the

Saad Nader wrote: > We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of > production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable > that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other > words, what is not stable about that branch? It's listed as "unstable" in the sense of "I might change the API" and that is

As long as the number of mails doesn't exceed what it is now I see no need for a separate mailing list. <p>>From: giles@xiph.org (Ralph Giles) >Reply-To: speex-dev@xiph.org >To: speex-dev@xiph.org >CC: jm@xiph.org, Darryl Davidson <ddavidson@talisman-intl.com> >Subject: [speex-dev] speex user list? >Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:59:01 -0400 > >Hi all, >

Hi, Speex-dev I've been able to get Speex to compile on SM400M(MIPSII) with problems. ------ Rebuild All started: Project: speexenc, Configuration: Debug SM400M (MIPSII) ------ Deleting intermediate and output files for project 'speexenc', configuration 'Debug|SM400M (MIPSII)' Compiling... getopt.c getopt1.c skeleton.c speexenc.c .\speexenc.c(501) : warning

Hi Jean-Marc, We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other words, what is not stable about that branch? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -----Original Message----- From:

Hello All I'm accessing speex via jni, I have successfully decoded and encoded data and capture and play it back in java. Now my challenge is speex's echo canceller. My capture and playback are not synchronized, so i got to use the method from 1.2beta2 right? What's the proper way to fit speex_echo_capture() and speex_echo_playback() into the following procedures, assuming they were

I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks! encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch

On 10/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As > far as I know (haven't checked the details), this is perfectly legal, > even though I think it's a dumb decision for a company that's in the > business of selling chips. I say it's dumb because by not contributing

farhan@phonestack.com wrote: > I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex > library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open > source. > http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html > scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As far

Hi Jean-Marc and others, I put Speex support in Sweep (a sound editor) yesterday, and had some fun with it :) I'd like to get some feedback before releasing it publically. I'm not really used to speech codecs (I work more with music) but I've been quite impressed at the file size and quality (especially when you hear what I did with some of the sample files ;) I didn't have any

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a narrowband 16-bit, 8khz system that has a severe program space problem and will not fit speex in its normal operation. In an attempt to shrink speex I placed a breakpoint in every function and ran a decode and encode and removed the breakpoints that I hit. in the functions that had a breakpoint that I didn't hit I commented out those functions (as well as