similar to: Patches for OpenVMS && Samba4

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > I can't find any evidence in the source code for new patches to have > Samba build on VMS Okay, well, at least I didn't just overlook something. > it certainly wasn't something we actively targeted when we moved from > autoconf to WAF with Samba 4.1. I'd be shocked if you did. Python 3.x isn't available on

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 17:02 -0600, Swift Griggs via samba wrote: > Refer to this: > https://legacyos.org/vsi-introduces-new-samba-release/ > > I noticed that VSI, the new owners of VMS, have created a package > for > Samba4 under OpenVMS. I also notice the samba-vms list appears to be > abandoned (for years). So, I apologize for posting here on the > general > list,

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba wrote: > I have run the same test on a Windows server share (on the same hardware as > the Samba share) and the transfer speed is stable, about 404KB/sec which is > three time quicker then the overage speed in the Samba share. Are you doing it on the same hardware, same drive, same everything? Even if you are, keep in mind that one

Hello, I'm testing the performance of Samba share when a windows client copy a directory that contains many small files (8-18KB). From the windows client during the transfer the speed goes up and down to 0KB/sec, so it's not stable. I have run the same test on a Windows server share (on the same hardware as the Samba share) and the transfer speed is stable, about 404KB/sec which is

We use .note descriptors with ELF on OpenVMS.  We have self-describing entries with tags and lengths.  The compiler encodes stuff for the linker such as compiler version, compilation date-time, module name, final severity of the compilation, etc.  The linker itself then adds/modifies the .note entries to insert linker version, link date/time, etc.  We also use .notes to record floating point

Hello, I'd like to introduce myself, my company, and our upcoming use of LLVM. My name is John Reagan. I've been working on compilers and assemblers since 1983 (yes, 31 years). Most of that time was spent on compilers for VAX/VMS (later renamed to OpenVMS), then OpenVMS on Alpha, and OpenVMS on Itanium. I've also worked with the HP NonStop platform and was directly involved

I'm looking at need to duplicate some drives data from one OpenVMS site to another OpenVMS site. Clustering is not an option, so was wondering if Rsync could be used between two OpenVMS sites and if there would be any issues with the files. James Horn SHSU 2449 Computer Services Sam Houston State University Huntsville TX 77340 Phone: (936) 294-1042 -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi all, I have two queries regarding WINE. 1) Is there support for VMS(OpenVMS) and MAC OS in WINE. I mean that can I install/build WINE over OpenVMS OS and MAC OS. 2) I have heard that WINE doesnot have support for WIN64 bit API's. Is this true that I cannot port WIN64 applications via WINE on Linux 64 bit. If this is possible for anyone among you then plz list the name of all the OS where

I've watched this list for a while and posted twice for information on a OpenVMS version of Rsync and had no replies. Is there no version?

Dear community, My company is interested in porting LLVM to OpenVMS. To do so, we need to look at extending the AMD64 calling convention to suit the existing calling conventions available on OpenVMS. We realize LLVM is a big and complex project and for some people who has not worked on it before, it's going to be a big and tough job that is going to take a lot of time. Still, the job has to

This is my first time posting on this list, so please excuse me if this is the wrong list to post on (if it is please just let me know). I've recently upgraded my old Redhat 8.0 box to Redhat Fedora Core 8 which comes with Samba 3.x while my old Redhat 8.0 box had Samba 2.x. On my old box I had SMB map a drive from an older OpenVMS server using Pathworks. I performed this by simply doing:

I have found that this server, <snip> debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version 3.1.0 F-SECURE SSH - Process Software SSH for OpenVMS debug1: no match: 3.1.0 F-SECURE SSH - Process Software SSH for OpenVMS </snip> does not follow the IETF secsh draft [1] related to the SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ message. <snip> ... Normally, the server responds

> Qualities > > 1. Be reasonably portable: at least in principle, it should be > possible to port to Windows, OS X, and various Unixes without major > changes. In general, I would like to see OpenVMS in that list. > Principles > > 1. Clean design rather than micro-optimization. A clean design allows optimization to be done by the compiler, and tight optimization

Hello, I searched through the mailing list archives here, at securityfocus.com, at HP and google and have come up dry. Sorry in advance if my search was not complete enough or I missed something but I sure as heck didn't see anything. ENV: Slackware 10 w/ ssh (SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.8.1p1) connecting to an alpha with OpenVMS 7.3-2 w/ sshd (Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3222 Bug ID: 3222 Summary: get -r doesn't work because directories are created without write permissions Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

I sent in a patch a week or so ago for a problem a customer of mine was seeing when trying to connect to their OpenVMS system with an 3.8.1p2 OpenSSH client (running on a linux box or in cygwin) and trying to login to an account who had an expired password. The problem continues although now it has nothing to do with what my patch handled as they have since upgraded their SSH software on the VMS

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

Darren, > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:08 PM > To: Scott Rankin > Subject: Re: SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ and 3.1.0 > F-SECURE SSH - Pr oces s Software SSH for OpenVMS > > > Scott Rankin wrote: > >>That will depend on which versions exhibit the problems. Is it >