Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package"
2019 Dec 20
5
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Hello,
> Looks like your in the middle of the dist-upgrade in buster.
Yes indeed.
> looks like bind is upgrading and samba-libs is not yet installed.
Indeed, I think it is not:
# dpkg -L samba-libs
dpkg-query: package 'samba-libs' is not installed
Also the following directories no longer exist:
- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/
- /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/
> apt-get update
2019 Dec 11
2
Notice: repo update samba 4.9.17 4.10.11 and 4.11.3
Hai,
If updated the following:
buster-samba411 for amd64/i386 and armhf, updated to 4.11.3
Buster-samba410 for amd64/i386, coming.
bionic-samba411 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.11.3
bionic-samba410 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.10.11
bionic-samba49 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.9.17
stretch-samba49 for amd64/i386 updated to 4.9.17
stretch-samba10 for amd64/i386, coming
Next on todo,
2019 Dec 20
0
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Hai,
Ok, for me so i know where you now at.
Looks like your in the middle of the dist-upgrade in buster.
Rowland is correct, looks like bind is upgrading and samba-libs is not yet installed.
If samba-libs is installed, lookup this line in you bind config.
include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf";
Open "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf" and verify if its set to
2019 Dec 19
0
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Hello Louis,
Sorry for my late answer.
I couldn't work on that earlier.
So I did steps:
stretch-samba48
stretch-samba49
stretch-samba410
Then when your at 4.10 you can safe upgrade to buster to
buster-samba410
At last step, apt-get dist-upgrade, bind9 failed:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installing new
2020 Sep 28
2
Debian Buster Samba 4.13 online (amd64/i386/armhf )
Hai,
?
Debian Buster Samba 4.13 is now online on my repo.
Info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/
With the release of 4.13 the following changes are going to happen in the repo's.
Current (recently sended?list)
OS-sambaXXXX with EOL wont be supported anymore, upgrade your OS and/or Samba versions!
EOL repo's will stay online for about 6 months, that gives sufficient time to upgrade.
2019 Dec 20
3
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
For a AD-DC on
systemctl start samba-ad-dc
For a member :
systemctl start smbd winbind (and optional nmbd)
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Lmloge [mailto:lmloge at orange.fr]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 20 december 2019 14:10
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Upgrading from Debian Stretch to
> Buster, Van Belle package
2019 Dec 20
4
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Ah, ok,
apt-get remove libldb1 ldb-tools
Then try again : apt install samba winbind acl
The replacement of libldb1 to libldb2 is missing something.
I'll have a look at that.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Lmloge [mailto:lmloge at orange.fr]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 20 december 2019 13:15
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
2020 Sep 23
1
error from repository http://apt.van-belle.nl/
hai,
?
To explain this a bit more.
All my repo's are set per os and samba version.
So as long you dont change the sambaXXX version, you stay on that version and minimze risk with changes in samba.
Its always :? http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian?
And all you change is :??? buster-samba412?
Current available versions are :
stretch-samba410
stretch-samba411
buster-samba411
buster-samba412
2020 Sep 23
2
error from repository http://apt.van-belle.nl/
Hello, I trying to install samba 4.11 from the repository
http://apt.van-belle.nl/
and have an error.
Err:4 http://apt.van-belle.nl/ubuntu bionic-samba411 Release
regards.
2016 Oct 16
2
bind9 won't run
I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with
Bind9_DLZ.
I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software
setup. First machine is working fine.
At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other (until I
get Bind running.)
I have searched log complaints. Compared settings between the two
machines and despite bind running on the first one,
2016 Oct 16
1
bind9 won't run
On 2016-10-16 12:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500
> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with
>> Bind9_DLZ.
>>
>> I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software
>> setup. First machine is
2020 Nov 16
3
samba binary repository for debian [WAS: variable substitution]
On 16/11/2020 10:34, Piviul via samba wrote:
> Piviul via samba ha scritto il 04/11/20 alle 14:15:
>> [...]
>> Someone knows why %J variable substitution is performed before the
>> print command variable substitution?
> I've found that on debian bullseye (samba version 4.12.5) the %J macro
> is expanded correctly so I argue that it's a bug solved on recent
2020 May 04
2
default backend = rid not showing full group information for users
On 04/05/2020 12:59, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote:
>
> root at samba01:~# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf? | grep winbind
> passwd:???????? files systemd winbind
> group:????????? files systemd winbind
OK, the only computer I have that runs systemd, is my Rpi4 running
Raspbian, which is basically Buster compiled for ARM.
I have in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
passwd:???????? files winbind
2020 Jun 19
1
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Am 19.12.19 um 19:15 schrieb Lmloge via samba:
> When upgrading use : apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove
> Which is needed to replace and remove optional samba packages.
> In the step from 4.10 to 4.11 the upgrade might stop.
> Then use: apt --fix-broken install
> That should remove libldb1 and upgrade contineus with installing libldb2.
hijacking this older thread now:
Did an
2019 Aug 05
6
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
... From your output below..
>> Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version <<
Then tell uss, why are 3 lines uncommented?
I suggest, run :
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh
Anonimize it where needed, and show me your server setup.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van:
2015 Aug 28
2
named failing with bind_dlz includes
Bind if failing with:
include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
which has:
# more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf
# This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support.
#
# This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file
#
# For example with
# include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
#
# This configures dynamically loadable
2019 Dec 20
4
Upgrading from Debian Stretch to Buster, Van Belle package
Ok,
Run :
apt install samba winbind acl
Dont worry if it errors out.
I m out for a quick run for some food, im back in about 30 min.
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Lmloge [mailto:lmloge at orange.fr]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 20 december 2019 12:11
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Upgrading from Debian Stretch
2015 Aug 28
1
named failing with bind_dlz includes
On 08/28/2015 01:58 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 28/08/15 18:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Bind if failing with:
>>
>> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
>>
>> which has:
>>
>> # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf
>> # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen
>> support.
>> #
>>
2016 Jul 26
2
bind 9.11.b2 with samba 4.4.5
i want to use bind 9.11beta2 version.
I do not see bind9_11.so
Best regards
cat /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf
# This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support.
#
# This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file
#
# For example with
# include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";
#
# This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ)
2017 Nov 27
2
Debian Buster, bind_dlz, and apparmor
Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of
dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because systemd
needs it. Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - due to
apparmor failures with bind_dlz.
Here is the initial journalctl results:
Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc named[16080]: starting BIND 9.10.6-Debian
<id:9d1ea0b> -f -u bind
Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc