similar to: Win10 cant connect to DomainController

On 23.04.19 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:35:16 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> I have a Win10 Client connected via openVPN to the company LAN. >> openVPN seem to work fine. I get Routes, the AD DNS server, can ping >> domain controller file Server etc. > > It looks like you

Hello, I have a Win10 Client connected via openVPN to the company LAN. openVPN seem to work fine. I get Routes, the AD DNS server, can ping domain controller file Server etc. Authendicaten on Fileserver fail (cant connect to domaincontroller) gpupdate fail with the same error. Firewall haas open all port list here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage I have try to debug with

On 08.04.19 16:20, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Basti, > > Anything in the windows even logs? > This might be related to smb1 and windows automaticly removing it. smbstatus say that all open connections are SMB2_10 and SMB3_11 the windows log say: german text and errorcode C0000006 > > Or something else. > Can you check with mtr from a windows pc to the

Ok that looks good. Ont to try on the pc your testing. Disable ipv6 ( just remove the checkmark dont remove it. ) from the network adapter. *( optional : http://www.bvanleeuwen.nl/faq/?p=1142 ipv6 admx template. ) I have a setup with this admx, i completely disabled ipv6 in my lan. And as Rowland also is telling.. Dns domain = foo Realm = FOO Workgroup = FOO

Windows-IP-Konfiguration Hostname . . . . . . . . . . . . : wks-1080 Prim„res DNS-Suffix . . . . . . . : foo Knotentyp . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP-Routing aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein WINS-Proxy aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein DNS-Suffixsuchliste . . . . . . . : foo Ethernet-Adapter Ethernet 2: Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: Beschreibung. . . . . .

my named.conf look like dlz "foo" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; }; Am 07.02.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:04:30 +0100 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Windows-IP-Konfiguration >> >> >> >>

I use bind on the same maschine as samba (bind_dlz). there is no additional bind9 in my test network. the default gw (kvm host) do nat. and bind of this network does know nothink about zone "foo". I think that is a problem of the windows nslookup. I installed bind nslookup on the PC just for test and this can resolve "foo" and "foo." c:\s_tools (nslookup win)

There's nothing wrong with that path. If your DNS is working, you should be able to connect to \\foo, which is your AD domain. It will just pick one of your DCs instead of a static one. Alex On 06/02/17 14:36, basti via samba wrote: > > samba-tool gpo listall > showes also wrong path in gpo > > > On 06.02.2017 15:21, basti via samba wrote: >> When I do an gpupdate

Hello, I have try windows 10 in an Samba 4.4.5 NT4-style domain. With some registry hacks (DomainCompatibilityMode and DNSNameResolutionRequired) it can be an member of the domain. When i try to login with domain member i get the error "There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request" At

On 27/08/2020 08:49, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3181029/smb-file-server-share-access-is-unsuccessful-through-dns-cname-alias > @Rowland have a good look at this one. This one is hitting the list.. (i have seen this problem also). I think everyone knows my views on NT4-style domains, they were a good idea at the time, but that time is most

[ Rowland, i know, i need to upgrade. ;-) ] Some month ago, with a relative big bunch of fix&tweaks, i was able to put a Win10 1903 client in join to a 'NT mode' Samba domain. Now i'm trying to do the same with a 1909 version; all seems to work as before, BUT netlogon script (defined in smb.conf with: logon script = startup.bat ) simply seems does not run. No log event in

that was my first idea. and how should an other user know which number he should dial? user a: soft phone extension 100 hardware phone extension 101 On 06.02.19 15:25, Mitch Claborn wrote: > You can do this in the dial plan. Register the devices separately and > include both addresses in the Dial() command. > > > Mitch > > On 2/6/19 8:16 AM, basti wrote: >> In

In other words. I there a way that both phones are ring with only one extension? On 06.02.19 15:05, basti wrote: > both phones are in the same net. > when the soft phone is shut down, on hardware phone only an led is > flashing to show an incoming call but no sound. > > both phones use the same extension. that is the reason why I use pjsip. > > On 06.02.19 14:59, Antony

[global] ## Browsing/Identification ### # Change this to the workgroup/NT-domain name your Samba server will part of ??? security = ADS ??? workgroup = NET ??? realm = relam.fqdn ??? log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log ??? log level = 3 ??? # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts ??? # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: ??? # - must not overlap with any

Hello Basti. Maybe you tried LE too early when it was not universally accepted as a trusted CA ? On Monday, February 20, 2017 2:22 PM, basti <basti at unix-solution.de> wrote: Hello, I had the same problem. LE is not in the CA list. Best Regards, On 17.02.2017 17:58, Bastian Sebode wrote: > Hello Folks, > > my StartCom SSL-Certificate expires soon and so I wanted to

On Wednesday 06 February 2019 at 13:54:44, Mark Wiater wrote: > These two phones are not using the same extension, are they? If you shut down the softphone, does the hardware phone then ring? Antony. > On 2/6/2019 8:49 AM, basti wrote: > > both phones are registered. and the hardware phone can also make calls. > > but an incoming call is not displayed and also not hearing.

Size: - one location - 15 IP Phones ( 1 dect) - Create new voip trunk (current are ISDN) (30 number block) - LTS is important - an SLA is optional at the moment there is no one On 11.12.2017 22:31, Ron Wheeler wrote: > You might want to add some details > - size of the project > ?-- number of locations > ?-- number of extensions > - are you converting your trunks? > - what are

On 09.07.20 10:29, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Basti, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> basti via samba >> Verzonden: donderdag 9 juli 2020 10:20 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: [Samba] AD Users on Linux Laptop >> >> Hello, >> I have setup

Only thing i see to do this is setup a clustert print server. I cant tell if its possible with samba. ( sorry ) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > basti via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 26 april 2017 16:39 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba AD Printer Failover >

Hello, i have a Samba AD Domain with multiple DC's at the moment all client are connectet to printer via dc2. Is theere a way to connect then in a failover mode? (in other words print via dc1 of dc2 is down) Best Regards Basti