similar to: Van Belle Repo - 4.10 for Bionic

you can upgrade from 4.7 to 4.9. but you must run samba-tool dbcheck that should work also. after the check run samba-tool dbcheck --reindex Main difference, a few depends and there versions. debian has tracker 1.0, ubuntu tracker 2.0 for example. Greetz Louis Op 30 mrt. 2019, om 16:20, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> schreef: Thanks Louis, appreciate it! The main reason

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:29:32 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 14:22, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 > > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> > wrote: > > > > you can upgrade from 4.7 to 4.9. > > but you must run samba-tool dbcheck > > that should work also. after the check run samba-tool dbcheck > > --reindex > > I

Hi Louis, Is your repo currently having issues, or did I manage to somehow get blocked by your firewall? I could access it 30 minutes ago, now it’s no longer working. # cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/samba.list deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bionic-samba49 main contrib non-free # apt update W: Failed to fetch http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/dists/bionic-samba49/InRelease Cannot initiate the

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 14:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:29:32 +0200 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 14:22, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 > > >

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 14:22, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:55:18 +0200 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> > > wrote: > > > > > > you can upgrade from 4.7 to 4.9. > > > but

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 20:23, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:11:02 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > > > Viktor

On 26/05/2019 18:28, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: > Small update: I added "lo" to the interfaces in smb.conf, now smbclient > works also on localhost. But both the other problems remain as described > for now. > > On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 19:17, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > >> I just did a restore of a backed up Samba DC and as feared,

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:40:10 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for taking an interest. > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 at 14:27, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:43:37 +0100 > > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > > > I

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 17:42, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is that a Samba AD DC

On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 17:45, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > you can upgrade from 4.7 to 4.9. > but you must run samba-tool dbcheck > that should work also. after the check run samba-tool dbcheck --reindex > I thought that maybe indeed I did something wrong the last time so I followed your advice. Unfortunately, it broke my DC again. (Luckily, I made a

No, that's not normal behavior, and I assume that's what's responsible for those other issues you're experiencing. I suggest you analyze your Samba installation thorougly using the information in the Wiki (there is a lot and in 90% problems can be solved or at least clearly identified with it). If it's just a lab setup, you might consider provisioning a new AD entirely. If you

On 6/19/2017 9:12 AM, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: > On 19 June 2017 at 14:56, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:46:34 +0200 >> Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: >> >>> On 19 June 2017 at 14:20, lingpanda101 via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:43:37 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > I could really use some support with this. I understand it's always > possible to just restore from a backup but the more interesting > question is if something can be done with the data at hand. > Basically, I'm trying to understand how it's possible that a dbcheck > shows no

On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 10:38:05 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > I'm not aware of a new folder being created. I can confirm that > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb is the only file with that name on my > system. How could I check if Samba indeed looks up this file and is > not looking for it somewhere else? > > Some additional information that might be

On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:16:28 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I just realized that I actually do have backups of everything in > /var/lib/samba (which is the main folder for Samba on Arch). > > I'd still be interested how to recover from this situation without a > backup but priority is to get the AD back up and running again.

I'd like to share the results of a little experiment I did yesterday. On an Arch Linux box on which in December I tried, and failed, to upgrade from 4.7.4. to 4.9.4 and then had to revert back to 4.7.4, yesterday I did the upgrade to the new 4.10 release. This time, everything worked, I had no errors whatsoever. So, I then made a backup of the new installation, in 3 different ways: Online

I was too quick to send my previous email. It can't really be a problem of the package since I have, as mentioned, another system with the exact same setup and the exact same package versions and it all works there... On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 11:18, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Yes, I tried running dbcheck (see first email), it showed 0 errors from > the start, I

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:46:34 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > On 19 June 2017 at 14:20, lingpanda101 via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 6/19/2017 7:51 AM, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: > > > >> That's correct, I don't have "Unix Attributes" but through the > >> advanced view I have

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 01:25, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz <caskater47 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was able to find this thread that seems to be the same problem I am > having. > > https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d861e179-6515-4322-a628-b7e73b2335e8/cannot-add-a-microsoft-account-to-domain-account-with-roaming-profiles?forum=win10itprogeneral > > When