similar to: Future AD domain currently want FreeRadius Samba or FreeIPA?

Dear All, I'm trying to setup FreeRADIUS to authenticate a machine account to grant access to wifi for domain-connected machines. I think I've got the GPO's set up properly and the CA deployed to the clients, as I'm not getting any errors there. The errors I'm getting are to do with ntlm_auth not authenticating my machine account. Everything looks OK (to me) on the command

Op 03-04-2023 om 16:05 schreef Tim ODriscoll via samba: > Dear All, > > I'm trying to setup FreeRADIUS to authenticate a machine account to grant access to wifi for domain-connected machines. I think I've got the GPO's set up properly and the CA deployed to the clients, as I'm not getting any errors there. > > The errors I'm getting are to do with ntlm_auth not

Hai, If you use that or the AD, then its incomplete, imo. Your missing ldaps (636) and the GC (ssl) 3268/3269) ports and maybe NTP (123/tcp) if installed. Maybe you dont need them, just an observation. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jeff > Sadowski via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2018

The DC is a Ubuntu 16.04, with samba 4.8 I want a local user in alls workstations with admin permissions, is for the support area, for install apps and if i make a freeipa and make the trust? i could have the users and GPOs for windows and users and tools for linux, is possible? El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 17:26, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Am 13.02.2018 um 05:16 schrieb Jeff Sadowski via samba: >> So my question is what services or ports am I missing to open? > > AD DCs: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage perfect exactly what I was looking for I found some docs about firewalld that

sorry guys to spam a bit - I hope someone from redhat could check whether - freeipa-users at redhat.com - is up & ok? I've been a subscriber for a couple of years but now, suddenly(?) I cannot mail there, I get: " Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: 554: 5.7.1 <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: Recipient

This is beacuse all workstations are windows, but we are thinking migrate to fedora. i already have all the users in samba DC. We access to internet and others apps with user from DC. because of that, we need both systems for now El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 18:23, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:57:26 -0300 > Carlos Bordon via

Hi, We're looking to run freeipa 4.1.1 on CentOS 7. 1. after include: * mkosek-freeipa-epel-7.repo 2. Write this: * yum install freeipa-server 3. I get this error: * Error: Package: pki-base-10.2.0-3.el7.centos.noarch (mkosek-freeipa) * Requires: jackson-jaxrs-json-provider I would appreciate any ideas. -- Cosme Faria Corr?a

When I set up a machine with CentOS 8, I used the "Enterprise Login" in the initial setup wizard to authenticate against my FreeIPA server. This worked fine, and I have no issues logging in with that initial user. However, I am unable to use GDM or the console to login as any *other* valid user from FreeIPA. From GDM I get something like "Sorry, that didn't work" and

Hi, I wonder if someone here is already authing against FreeIpa with some latest Ubuntu/SSSD install. I'm on on Ubuntu 15.10 for samba to test this out: Samba: 4.1.17 SSSD: 2.1.17 Freeipa: 4 on CentOS 7 I don't need an AD so I'm folling this what still does not apply. http://www.freeipa.org/page/Howto/Integrating_a_Samba_File_Server_With_IPA I hope someone can help out and

This lays 90% of the groundwork needed on the server side to support the use of a remote ipa server. Leaving the option disabled in the installer until the necessary node integration(dns/keytab placementi location) is completed Also apply: [PATCH server] update ovirt-add-host to use ipa commands instead of kadmin.local [PATCH server] separate ipa common tasks freeipa::common and rename

Hello I just finished setting up FreeIPA with Dovecot + Postfix + Saslauthd. I can easily access to mails using imap via dovecot with gssapi authentication and postfix also delivering mails very well. But I cannot send email from postfix using gssapi authentication (plain and login authentication working fine) because saslauthd is not specifying realm when requesting service from freeipa domain.

It seems to me that the ver of FreeRadius is 1.0.1: yum list | grep "radius" freeradius.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 installed freeradius-mysql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-postgresql.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base freeradius-unixODBC.i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4 base According to freeradius.org, this

Op 03-04-2023 om 16:05 schreef Tim ODriscoll via samba: > Dear All, > > I'm trying to setup FreeRADIUS to authenticate a machine account to grant access to wifi for domain-connected machines. I think I've got the GPO's set up properly and the CA deployed to the clients, as I'm not getting any errors there. > > The errors I'm getting are to do with ntlm_auth not

It is an issue that I myself would also like to solve. I found multiple threads in samba and freeradius mailing lists. It seems that every couple of months there is question like this either here on FR mailing list and all point down to the same issue, that is: freeradius uses ntlm_auth (even when using winbind with newer freeradius versions, it also in the end uses ntlm_auth). And since

Hi, I''m faced with the question if we should be doing user management directly using freeipa (an integrated LDAP, Kerberos, CA, etc) or by manipulating freeipa using Puppet. Installation and configuration of the service is already performed through Puppet so this only concerns the data stored by freeipa (users, groups, sshkeys, sudo permissions, etc). Pros of puppet: - everything

On 13/08/2019 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:02:58PM +0100, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > >> I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? >> >> I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I >> might ask. > RHEL 7.7 has FreeIPA 4.6.5, and eventually CentOS will get that > version, but it's

Bonjour, It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work. When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet arrives on the server. Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ? Thanks PS: no error with the compilation of the last source version of freeradius (3.0.7) --

Ok, I finally could try it out, and it seems to actually work, but You need samba 4.7 on all machines, not only AD, but also server with freeradius. I didn't get a chance to test it locally, that is samba AD + freeradius on the same server. Setup: 4.7.6 AD server and 4.6.2 samba member + freeradius didn't work (got simple "nt_status_wrong_password") but: 4.7.6 AD and 4.7.1

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,