similar to: Binaries for Debian and Ubuntu

I'm wondering why Ubuntu 14.04 contains packages for 4.1.6 but not 4.1.17 or 4.1.18? Since 4.1.x is the current maintenance mode, I'd expect it to be included in Ubuntu repos Should we be adding a repository to our 'sources.list'? On 05/29/2015 01:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 28.05.2015 um 04:45 schrieb Andrew _: >> There are no Debian / Ubuntu repositories

I need to be asking Ubuntu why they're not providing updates in their backports repo Anyway, thanks for the answer. On 05/29/2015 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.05.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Steve Ankeny: >> I'm wondering why Ubuntu 14.04 contains packages for 4.1.6 but not >> 4.1.17 or 4.1.18? >> >> Since 4.1.x is the current maintenance mode, I'd

Am 29.05.2015 um 23:10 schrieb Steve Ankeny: > I need to be asking Ubuntu why they're not providing updates in their > backports repo because there is no reason to do so? 4.1.6 is not just 4.1.6 as released upstream just look at the *complete* apckage version backports repo != backporting don't get me wrong but you *really* need to learn some basics or just accept the your

Am 29.05.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Steve Ankeny: > I'm wondering why Ubuntu 14.04 contains packages for 4.1.6 but not > 4.1.17 or 4.1.18? > > Since 4.1.x is the current maintenance mode, I'd expect it to be > included in Ubuntu repos Ubuntu is Debian based you need to learn how LTS distributions work with backporting security issues or switch to a distribution which ships

Thanks. I figured out that there is no Debian packages because nobody builds them... So let me ask another question: Why there is no interest in building Samba? There must be some reason for that. Cheers Am 28.05.2015 um 04:45 schrieb Andrew _: > There are no Debian / Ubuntu repositories available with recent Samba > releases. > What is the reason for this situation? because nobody

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > >>such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > >>running on the Synology ? > > >

I understand about using the newer binaries, but what I really want to "save" is the active directory. Sorry I should have been clear. I do not want to have to rejoin/recreate everything. Thanks. Jason On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 29.06.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Waters: > >> I have been using Ubuntu

I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up. When run from a terminal it prints: no suitable windowing system found, exiting. Is this yet another case of apps moving on beyond compatibility with the older components in C5? Or any hints for making it work? Thanks! -- ---- Fred Smith --

Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>>

you wouldnt know, your not a developer, shit processor maybe, but not a developer On 4/3/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofm?ller: >> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >>>> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at

So I can just copy the data into the new directory the package creates? On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 29.06.2015 um 16:28 schrieb Jason Waters: > >> I understand about using the newer binaries, but what I really want to >> "save" is the active directory. Sorry I should have been clear. I do

On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for >>>> *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free

Hi, I would like to add a feature to my email-client (Thunderbird) which stops emails from showing up until a specific time (e.g. having buttons for: show again this evening, tomorrow, next week, next month ...). As far as I've learned this is not possible with IMAP: - storing the 'do-not-show-until-time' within a custom header-field requires down- and uploading of the whole email and

I would like to get dovecot running on my laptop so I can transfer a lot of old Email from Thunderbird mailbox files to a hosted zimbra service. However I'm falling at the first hurdle. I'm running Debian squeeze i386 (kernel 2.6.32-5-686) and have installed dovecot-imapd and dovecot-common with synaptic and edited /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf to make sure it has the right protocols

Am 06.08.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:42:32 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > >> >> Am 05.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 04:47:05 -0400 >>> Steve Ankeny <steve_a at cinergymetro.net> wrote: >>> >>>> What about the use of 'realm =

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:59:19 +0200 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 28.03.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Lapin Blanc: >

Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > running on the Synology ? Jeremy, The smbd version is 4.1.18, according to the NOS value shown in /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData on the client side, and according to "smbd -V" on the server

Hello Reindl, thank you for the response. I want to make sure that the postfix delivery does not give up trying to get the email delivered when the lmtp host is not reachable. I do not just want to assume that the default settings are correct for us. Are there postfix or other settings which can be checked and adjusted? On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at

Hi list (and happy new year), I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over VPN. Basically we've following setup : PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost always ends up with a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error (or "a network error occured" if trying to copy from

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:22:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:32:33 +0200 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 28.03.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: