similar to: Internal DNS update behavior / scavenging records

Hello, At one point secure dynamic updates worked. Now I require 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' for dynamic updates to work. I can't seem to find any trace of updates being performed in the samba logs or Windows. I've hit a wall and can't seem to progress. Since I couldn't pull anything from the logs I decided to run 'nsupdate -g -d -D -L 10'. This was

On 8/24/2016 12:10 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:56:06 -0400 > lingpanda101--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I know you asked recently but I do have them from a long ago >> provisioned DC as reference. >> >> > If you have them, I think you may be the only one who does ;-) > > A bit of searching

Hello, After upgrading all external services will no longer authenticate to the domain. One of those is osTicket. Looking through the release notes I figured this would happen. However I'm a bit tentative to make changes to my smb.conf without doing damage and asking for help from the list. I have 6 DC's. One holds all the FMSO roles. This is the smb.conf from that DC. [global]

On 4/13/2016 1:48 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/13/2016 12:15 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> Hello, >> >> After upgrading all external services will no longer authenticate >> to the domain. One of those is osTicket. Looking through the release >> notes I figured this would happen. However I'm a bit tentative to >> make

On 4/13/2016 12:15 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading all external services will no longer authenticate > to the domain. One of those is osTicket. Looking through the release > notes I figured this would happen. However I'm a bit tentative to make > changes to my smb.conf without doing damage and asking for help from > the list. I

Hello, Enabling client specific logging I receive the following error when issuing @pdc1:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool testparm Can't find include file /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf.client-%I ERROR: Unable to load default file Samba does find the file as evident by the log being created and using the appropriate parameters. pdc1:~# ls /usr/local/samba/etc/ lmhosts rsyncd.secret

>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad Dont we need idmap config in the smb.conf also, or is above not used anymore, if so the we must change the wiki. Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > lingpanda101 at gmail.com > Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2016 15:37 > Aan: samba at

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:56:06 -0400 lingpanda101--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I know you asked recently but I do have them from a long ago > provisioned DC as reference. > > If you have them, I think you may be the only one who does ;-) A bit of searching doesn't turn up anything about _ldaps records, just _ldap. Rowland

On 12/8/2016 2:10 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:54:17 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 12/8/2016 1:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:03:49 -0500 >>> lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/8/2016 12:52

typo in : Conditional forwarders are implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. change Conditional forwarders are not implemented yet. The same error message as above is returned. :-) good work :-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus

> It should work ;-) > Can you post your smb.conf and /etc/named.conf files > Rowland Hello Rowland. Of course I can: cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SVMETAL realm = samdom.svmetal.cz netbios name = DC01 server services = -dns server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes allow dns updates =

I read the 4.9 “Features added" release notes about newly available DNS scavenging features, and the problem with domains that were set up in earlier versions of samba AD. "It is now possible to enable scavenging of DNS Zones to remove DNS records that were dynamically created and have not been touched in some time.” “This support should however only be enabled on new zones or new

I have a bit of an oddity here: I'm using Samba 4.2.14 with AD, using Samba's internal DNS to serve to my domain (and forwarding others to Google Public DNS 8.8.8.8). However, it looks like client queries (and subsequent forwards) to a vendor's URL (www.pitneybowes.us) fail, but are successful if I query Google directly: [root at XXXX~]# nslookup -type=any www.pitneybowes.us >

On the Samba wiki at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Internal_DNS there is the following: If you have chosen the internal DNS as backend for your environment, there are only two options that can be added to your smb.conf, to control the behaviour of DNS at this point: # Don't allow any updates | allow unsigned updates | only allow signed updates allow dns updates = False |

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Samba 3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 I have run into an issue where the DNS records added by a net ads join seem to be being scavenged. From what I understand, Windows servers/workstations check in (update their host record) on the AD DNS server on a regular basis. So the question is, how can I have samba/winbind do the same? I could just setup a cron

ah yes.. that are the "limitation", but know limitations ( for us ) Rowland, this is something to add on the wiki. (here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration ) ;-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yuriy Tabolin >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2015 11:35 >Aan: samba at

With Linux DHCP + Bind it was possible to have the DHCP server dynamically update Bind as new clients appeared. I don't need the clients themselves updating DNS records directly. For those few nodes using static IP addresses and not on the AD domain, I'm fine with having to manually enter their A/PTR records into the DNS database. IIRC normal MS Windows AD DC allows for nodes that are

Hi! I'm having some trouble with samba internal dns - it is acting as a forwarder too. If a few users (1 or 2) are logged in, OK. But if more users are logged in, no name is resolved. So every (exactly) 10 minutes I see high IO usage (samba process writes about +500MB in disk, I don't know where) and samba logs: ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done)

Thanks Rowland, I tried that just now, but as soon as I restarted samba, the error occurred again a few seconds afterwards. The good news, I suppose, is that it's easy to reproduce - each time I restart samba I get the error :) But, it wasn't helped by adding "allow dns updates = nonsecure" to smb.conf on one of my DCs. I wonder if there is some error being flagged by the

Hello all, some additional info: Samba version is 4.10.6 on Centos7 with sernet packages. I am using bind_dlz as dns. This happens on all DC regardless if scavening was enabled with the Windows DNS Manager. I enabled one new zone but this still happens. Replication is also not working then as the kcc seqfaults every view seconds. In the release notes it says: This support should however only be