similar to: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support"

2020 Aug 21
2
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
> On 21/08/2020 08:48 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > > On 20/08/20 11:02 pm, Thomas Scheunemann wrote: > > Using the Repo http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest after upgrading from > > 2.3.10.1-3 to 2.3.11.3-3 we get numerous error messages like: > > > > dovecot: imap-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory >
2020 Aug 21
2
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too
2020 Aug 21
0
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On 20/08/20 11:02 pm, Thomas Scheunemann wrote: > Using the Repo http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest after upgrading from > 2.3.10.1-3 to 2.3.11.3-3 we get numerous error messages like: > > dovecot: imap-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory > > We use tcpwrap support in dovecot, which worked flawlessly in the older version. > I can see that the
2020 Aug 21
0
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
>>>> At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support >>>> tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge >>>> dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much > effort to continue suport for every feature that was ever in the system?
2020 Aug 21
0
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support >> tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge >> dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > We are looking into this, it was indeed removed from el7 by accident. RPM macros can be quite tricky sometimes. I have: %if
2017 Dec 29
2
dovecot-pigeonhole problems after upgrade to v2.3.0
Am 29.12.2017 um 15:08 schrieb Fabian A. Santiago: > December 28, 2017 6:38 PM, "Peter" <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > >> On 29/12/17 10:00, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: >> >>> i've now completely uninstalled all traces of dovecot and reinstalled >>> from your repo and still the same issue persists with the same >>> errors.
2013 Mar 03
1
tcpwrap: Fatal: master: service(tcpwrap): child $PID killed with signal 11
Hi Timo, today I've started Dovecot v2.2.rc2 (976bf9e69367) for the first time. /var/log/mail.log: Mar 3 14:28:33 mail dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.rc2 (976bf9e69367) starting up Mar 3 14:28:38 mail dovecot: master: Error: service(tcpwrap): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs Mar 3 14:28:38 mail dovecot: tcpwrap: Fatal: master: service(tcpwrap): child $PID killed with signal
2017 Dec 28
5
dovecot-pigeonhole problems after upgrade to v2.3.0
December 28, 2017 2:52 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > December 28, 2017 1:21 PM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >>> On December 28, 2017 at 7:43 PM "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: >>> >>> December 28, 2017 12:14 PM, "Aki
2020 Aug 23
2
doveadm/doveconf as user tries and fails to read host key
Distro: OpenSuSE Tumbleweed for x86_64 Failing version: dovecot23-2.3.11.3-1.1.x86_64 Install Date: 2020-08-18 Reverting to previous version works: dovecot23-2.3.10.1-2.3.x86_64 (Packages downgraded coordinately: dovecot23 dovecot23-backend-sqlite) How to make it fail: As the user, execute doveadm expunge mailbox Spam37 savedbefore 3day #User's actual cmd doveadm who #The simplest
2020 Jul 08
6
Urgent Help required
Thank you for the reply. As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 version. Not more than that. Am I able to install or upgrade to dovecot 2.3 version in redhat 7.7? I have another question. I understand redhat 6.10 will go out of support in november 2020. But this is a test environment. Am i able to install dovecot 2.3 version on redhat 6.10? For the Live support, I
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
It works ! It was THAT easy ! Can you suggest how to replace the hair I pulled out ? :-) On 2016-12-29 5:27 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > login_access_sockets = tcpwrap > > service tcpwrap { > unix_listener login/tcpwrap { > group = $default_login_user > mode = 0600 > user = $default_login_user > } > } > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at
2020 Aug 13
2
2.3.11.3 on 32bit platforms
HI! I'm trying to update openSUSE package on OBS [1] which builds for various OS versions and hardware platforms. To me it seems that a test fails on 32bit platforms: Info: invalid token 3: structure length disagrees with data size test rpa ..................................... : ok Info: invalid NTLM response: buffer length out of bounds test ntlm ............................: ok 1 / 86
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
I have compiled dovecot2 for FreeBSD with the tcpwrap option. A tcpwrap binary gets built and resides in the FreeBSD directory /usr/local/libexec/dovecot an examination of the compiled options (using the FreeBSD pkg install dovecot2) confirms: LIBWRAP : on yet, when I adjust dovecot.conf with: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap I get the following logged error message: 20161229 17:02:49
2016 Nov 14
2
dovecot / tcp-wrappers / FBSD 10.3
Can anyone share the proper config to get wrappers working in dovecot on FreeBSD? The dovecot examples do not seem to work, and I thought perhaps FBSD needs slightly different configs. I've compiled with: -DHAVE_LIBWRAP which I presume is the first step. The example for dovecot.conf in uncommenting: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap merely causes a log error of "imap-login: Error:
2011 Aug 29
1
dovecot w/ libwrap on fbsd
Dovecot with libwrap doesn't work on FreeBSD for some reason or another. I have these lines in my /etc/hosts.allow: ALL: LOCAL 127.0.0.1: allow pop3: ALL: allow ALL: ALL: deny Yet when you try to telnet to localhost, port 110 this is what happens: Aug 29 22:48:38 dodo dovecot: pop3-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: Permission denied I also tried auth_debug=yes to see what's wrong
2010 Mar 25
1
Dovecot 2.0beta4
Hello, It seems dovecot 2.0 beta4 still behave strangely without tcpwrap. I still get the errors: 2010-03-25_17:26:59.33848 Fatal: service(tcpwrap) access(/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory 2010-03-25_17:27:00.36108 Fatal: service(tcpwrap) access(/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: Permission denied It's easy to solve by touching and
2010 Mar 07
1
2.0 beta 3 w/o libwrap?
I'm trying to kickstart 2.0b3 on my NetBSD system (where 1.2.x works great!), and keep hitting: Fatal: service(tcpwrap) access(/software/dovecot-2.0beta3/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory Indeed, that file doesn't exist...but I don't have nor want libwrap. It appears that doveconf includes tcpwrap... service tcpwrap { chroot = client_limit = 1
2013 Jul 03
1
tcpwrappers
hi everybody having I believe sort of plain-vanilla config with section in 10-tcpwrapper.conf as per docs login_access_sockets = tcpwrap service tcpwrap { unix_listener login/tcpwrap { group = $default_login_user mode = 0600 user = $default_login_user } } /etc/hosts.deny contains: ALL: given_host and yet dovecot logins IMAP client in whereas other tcpwrapper aware
2010 Feb 25
2
dovecot-2.0.beta3 tcpwrapper support in Solaris
Hi, 2.0 compiles fine in Solaris but and I've found only one glitch so far. Tcpwapper support needs some tweaks. I need to add CPPFLAGS=/usr/sfw/include because tcpd.h is in there. Then also LDFLAGS='-R/usr/sfw/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib' is needed. It would be nice to have --with-tcpwrap-dir or something. After this linking gives an error Undefined first referenced symbol in file
2017 Jan 05
4
CDB tables in Centos7 Postfix ?
Hi, It seems the default binaries don't have CDB tables compiled into them ? Now, I know Centos isn't Ubuntu, but on Ubuntu there is an optional package in the main distribution "postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix". I can't find anything similar using "yum search", so I'm guessing that's not an option. Unless anyone else here corrects me