Aki Tuomi
2020-Aug-21 05:55 UTC
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
> On 21/08/2020 08:48 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > > On 20/08/20 11:02 pm, Thomas Scheunemann wrote: > > Using the Repo http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest after upgrading from > > 2.3.10.1-3 to 2.3.11.3-3 we get numerous error messages like: > > > > dovecot: imap-login: Error: connect(tcpwrap) failed: No such file or directory > > > > We use tcpwrap support in dovecot, which worked flawlessly in the older version. > > I can see that the socket /var/run/dovecot/login/tcpwrap is not created anymore. > > And comparing with RPMs, the new one seems to be missing the file: > > > > /usr/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap > > > > which leads me to conclusion that the new version is just not compiled with tcpwrap > > support. > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > # rpm -qf /usr/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap > dovecot23-2.3.11.3-1.gf.el7.x86_64 > > > PeterHi! We are looking into this, it was indeed removed from el7 by accident. RPM macros can be quite tricky sometimes. Aki
Peter
2020-Aug-21 06:02 UTC
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote:>> At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support >> tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge >> dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > We are looking into this, it was indeed removed from el7 by accident. RPM macros can be quite tricky sometimes.I have: %if 0%{?rhel} < 8 BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel %endif ... then later ... %if 0%{?rhel} < 8 --with-libwrap \ %endif Peter
Hendrik Boom
2020-Aug-21 13:42 UTC
RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote:> On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7:So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much effort to continue suport for every feature that was ever in the system? If the former, might it be reasonable for a user to change the 8's in the code below to 9's? -- hendrik> > > > We are looking into this, it was indeed removed from el7 by accident. RPM macros can be quite tricky sometimes. > > I have: > > %if 0%{?rhel} < 8 > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel > %endif > > ... then later ... > > %if 0%{?rhel} < 8 > --with-libwrap \ > %endif > > > Peter
Reasonably Related Threads
- RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
- RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
- RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
- RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support
- RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support