similar to: mail_max_userip_connections

Outlook version is 16.40 hfh at cndns.com From: Jerry Date: 2020-09-08 13:22 To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: Outlook problems on Apple systems(Mac os) On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:57:59 +0800, hfh at cndns.com <hfh at cndns.com> stated: >Dovecot is on version 2.2.36. I tested it. Outlook on the Apple system >successfully logged in with the imap protocol, and then sent the LIST

hi, The following error message sometimes appears on my server log,it causes the mailbox to exceed the disk capacity limit. May 9 09:54:11 imap dovecot: imap(hfh at cndns.com): Error: dict-client: Lookup 'priv/quota/storage' failed: Connection closed: read(size=8192) failed: Connection reset by peer (reply took 2.728 secs (2.729 in dict wait, 0.000 in other ioloops, 0.000 in locks))

Dovecot is on version 2.2.36. I tested it. Outlook on the Apple system successfully logged in with the imap protocol, and then sent the LIST command and outlook did not send any further. Dovecot returns the results as follows: A003 OK LIST completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). There is no problem with version 2.1.17 using dovecot before. The information returned by dovecot in version 2.1.17 is as

How to make the client tool only display emails within 30 days? thanks??? hfh at cndns.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190808/d779b210/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 12(08-08-15-37-19).gif Type: image/gif Size: 2247

logging some error,dict process is not dead. hfh at cndns.com From: Aki Tuomi via dovecot Date: 2019-05-09 14:21 To: hfh at cndns.com; dovecot Subject: Re: dict lookup too long time On 9.5.2019 8.00, hfh--- via dovecot wrote: hi, The following error message sometimes appears on my server log,it causes the mailbox to exceed the disk capacity limit. May 9 09:54:11 imap dovecot: imap(hfh at

Thank you so much, I tried it? hfh at cndns.com ???? Aki Tuomi via dovecot ????? 2019-08-08 15:47 ???? hfh at cndns.com; dovecot ??? Re: How to make the client tool only display emails within 30 days? On 8.8.2019 10.46, hfh--- via dovecot wrote: doveadm search -u matt mailbox "*" savedbefore 30d Dovecot's configuration or plugin can do similar effects like the above? Outlook

>> I found that scsicmd can't pass all the scsi3_test but the result of >> sg_inq is the same as it in the host. >> >> I am absolutely confused about this situation. Am I missed some >> information about it? I guess this is caused by the lack of capability. Please check if enough capability was added to kvm process by the following steps. 1. Check the pid of

How to display emails within 30 days or 60 days in inbox, sent box, etc. For example, in the mail client tool, the user clicks the inbox button and only sees the mail within 30 days. The virtual mailbox plugin will only generate a new mailbox. Thank you??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dovecot's acl plugin can prevent deletion of messages,it works very well! I want: Some ips can delete messages, other ips can not delete messages,can anyone help me? hfh at cndns.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190813/68382290/attachment.html>

If the program is writing email content to the disk, will the program restart cause the email content to be written incomplete and the file will be damaged? hfh at cndns.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200106/1f1a68af/attachment.html>

On 2020-06-05 06:16, hfh at cndns.com wrote: > How to display emails within 30 days or 60 days in inbox, sent box, > etc. For example, in the mail client tool, the user clicks the inbox > button and only sees the mail within 30 days. The virtual mailbox > plugin will only generate a new mailbox. roundcube archive by month IMHO its not a dovecot option Thunderbird and roundcube can

I found that when the mailbox name contains special characters such as \x7f, when the doveadm quota recalc -u xxx command is executed, the messages under the mailbox name with special characters will not be counted. doveadm mailbox list -u xxx Actual mailbox name: doveadm quota recalc -u xxx, Mail under 'INBOX.Metaltex' will not be counted. hfh at cndns.com -------------- next part

Does doveadm http api have high execution efficiency? I have a program that directly calls doveadm http api. Will there be an efficiency problem if a large number of users call it? hfh at cndns.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20201021/15923f8a/attachment.html>

I know the call parking feature changed in 1.4.23.1 to fix some serious issues. I'm seeing a major change though which I find disturbing. A person parks a call by transferring it to the parking position (700). When the timeout value is reached, the call is NOT returned to that device, but rather the 's' extension of the phone's registered context (in this case [unrestricted]).

Hi all, using latest asterisk-svn I want to reflect an video call incoming via an PRI EuroISDN channel to another outgoing PRI channel, and I want the the outgoing channel to have the exact same bearer capability < Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Unrestricted digital information (8) < Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate:

Hi! We planing to by some PRI/BRI equipment to replace our existing telephone system. So I am going to try this: ISDN Card Outgoing Digital Call / Capability: Unrestricted digital information -> octobri -> asterisk -> TE410E -> Internet Provider / Receiver for Capability Unrestricted digital information The question is: Is asterisk possible of transmit this digital call to the

All - I am evaluating an arima(2,1,3) and arima(3,1,3) and notice the log-likelihood of the restricted model is higher than the log-likelihood of the unrestricted. Since these are nested models, I thought the unrestricted model would have a log-likelihood at least as large as that of the restricted model. Am I interpreting the "loglik" output incorrectly? Regards, Stephen

DOVECOT -N # 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 (124e06aa) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.9 (Final) '''' plugin { ''' mail_replica = tcp:10.1.1.20:1111 # replication_sync_timeout = 2s replication_sync_timeout = 2 '''' } '''' ?

DOVECOT -N # 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 (124e06aa) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.9 (Final) '''' plugin { ''' mail_replica = tcp:10.1.1.20:1111 # replication_sync_timeout = 2s replication_sync_timeout = 2 '''' } ''''

Hi, is it possible, that my * identifies himself as ip-phone? I.e. Im using a grandstrem 100 phone and if I use * as proxy, the authentification string should be changed. Im not sure where looking for this. Hfh, Oliver