Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "alterstorage for archiv"
2019 Jan 24
0
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
This has been fixed with
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/63a74b9e8e0604486a15a879e7f1a27257322400.patch
Aki
> On 24 January 2019 at 19:26 Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL <maciej.milaszewski at iq.pl> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
> Thenx. Dump core:
>
> Core was generated by `dovecot/auth'.
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0?
2019 Jan 24
0
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Try
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
gdb /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/auth /var/run/dovecot/core
</div>
<div>
bt full
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
2019 Nov 20
0
Error: Raw backtrace and index cache
This is likely fixed in more recent version, can you try with 2.2.36?
Aki
On 20.11.2019 11.20, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL wrote:
> Hi
> Thanx for replay.
>
> Log:
>
> http://paste.debian.net/1117077/
>
>
> On 20.11.2019 10:07, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be
>> helpful if you can reproduce this with
2019 Nov 20
2
Error: Raw backtrace and index cache
Hi
Thanx for replay.
Log:
http://paste.debian.net/1117077/
On 20.11.2019 10:07, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be
> helpful if you can reproduce this with 2.2.36.
>
> Also, you forgot to actually include in your log snippet the panic. So
> maybe few more lines before the Raw backtrace?
>
> Aki
>
> On 20.11.2019
2019 Jul 04
2
solr vs fts
Hi
I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x
Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via
/home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/
I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk
(/var/dovecot_indexes%h)
A few clients have 25K and more e-mail
I thinking about use solr like:
?fts = solr
?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine)
Does it make sense ?
2019 Jan 24
2
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
Thenx. Dump core:
Core was generated by `dovecot/auth'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0? 0x00007fa910394c7a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt full
#0? 0x00007fa910394c7a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1? 0x00005604e6f98bc8 in password_scheme_register_crypt () at
password-scheme-crypt.c:144
2019 Nov 20
0
Error: Raw backtrace and index cache
Firstly, 2.2.13 is about 5 years old. So there's that. It would be
helpful if you can reproduce this with 2.2.36.
Also, you forgot to actually include in your log snippet the panic. So
maybe few more lines before the Raw backtrace?
Aki
On 20.11.2019 10.54, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:
> Hi
> I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't
2019 Nov 20
2
Error: Raw backtrace and index cache
Hi
I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't know
how to solve it ...
Server is a virtual (kvm) with debian 8.11 (postfix + dovecot from repo)
and storage is mounting via nfs (I have use only one dovecot with
external storage)
All works fine but sometime ( after a few hours ) I have got a problem
with dovecot cache (i use indexes)
logs ->
2019 Jul 04
0
solr vs fts
On 4.7.2019 12.14, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:
> Hi
> I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x
>
> Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via
> /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/
> I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk
> (/var/dovecot_indexes%h)
>
> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail
>
> I thinking about use
2019 Jan 24
1
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Another known issue, fixed with
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/ca4c2579f0456072bdb505932a9cf7602e42afd2.patch
Aki
> On 24 January 2019 at 20:54 Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL <maciej.milaszewski at iq.pl> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
> Like bumerang.
>
> 2.2.36 works fine on debian10 but connect by telnet like:
>
> Connected to 46.xxx.xxx.xxx.
> Escape character is
2019 Jan 24
0
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
Like bumerang.
2.2.36 works fine on debian10 but connect by telnet like:
Connected to 46.xxx.xxx.xxx.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Imap ready.
^]
telnet> q
Connection closed.
dovenull?? 664? 0.0? 0.0?? 7796? 6052 ???????? S??? 19:54 ? 0:00? \_
dovecot/imap-login??
2019 Jan 24
2
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
Thenx but maby problem is in ssl or core file and gdb was incorrectly used
# 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 (124e06aa)
# OS: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 x86_64 Debian buster/sid
Jan 24 16:56:38 thebe-postfix dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.36
(1f10bfa63) starting up for imap, pop3, lmtp, sieve
Jan 24 16:56:39 thebe-postfix dovecot: master: Error:
2019 Jan 24
0
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Hi!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Can you get backtrace from the core file?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<a
2019 Jan 24
2
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
Thenx for replay.
Finaly for a test in my lab
I upgrate to latest 2.2.36 and os debian 10
In this machine is dovecot director
But if i tested via telnet
root at postfix:~# telnet 46.xxx.xxx.xxx 143
Trying 46.xxx.xxx.xxx...
Connected to 46.xxx.xxx.xxx.
Escape character is '^]'.
* BYE Disconnected: Auth process broken
Connection closed by foreign host.
In log:
Jan 24 16:02:07 postfix
2019 Jul 04
2
solr vs fts
>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail
>>
>> I thinking about use solr like:
>> ?fts = solr
>> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine)
>>
>> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ?
>> What is the difference in performance?
>>
> Hi!
>
> Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that
2019 Jan 23
0
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Maybe you should try 2.2.36?
Aki
On 22.1.2019 16.47, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL wrote:
> Hi
> I have little problem with debian10 and dovecot 2.2.33.2
>
> ps -ax
> 21815 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
> 21816 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
> 21817 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
> 21818 ???????? S????? 0:00
2019 Jan 22
2
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
I have little problem with debian10 and dovecot 2.2.33.2
ps -ax
21815 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
21816 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
21817 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
21818 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
21819 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
21821 ???????? S????? 0:00 dovecot/pop3-login director
2020 Oct 26
3
[Bug 1477] New: Unable to use saved ruleset when using dynamic sets
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477
Bug ID: 1477
Summary: Unable to use saved ruleset when using dynamic sets
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at
2019 Jul 04
0
solr vs fts
On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:
>>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail
>>>
>>> I thinking about use solr like:
>>> ?fts = solr
>>> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine)
>>>
>>> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ?
>>> What is the difference in
2019 Jan 24
2
debian10+dovecot-2.2.33.2
Hi
Thenx for replay - problem solved :)
I forget `autoreconf -vi`
You are rox :)
?On 24.01.2019 19:10, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> You need to do `autoreconf -vi` before configure, won't work otherwise.
>
> Aki
>
>> autoreconf -viOn 24 January 2019 at 20:09 Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL <maciej.milaszewski at iq.pl> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi
>> Thenx. I use your