>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that much. Using FTS > usually makes sense since it speeds up IMAP fulltext searches. > > Aki >Hi So you're advised to use a solr or something else?
On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:>>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >>> >>> I thinking about use solr like: >>> ?fts = solr >>> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >>> >>> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >>> What is the difference in performance? >>> >> Hi! >> >> Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that much. Using FTS >> usually makes sense since it speeds up IMAP fulltext searches. >> >> Aki >> > Hi > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? >Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) Aki
Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:> On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) >Hi Aki, I didn't yet think about using FTS either but followed a bit the thread about developing the Xapian plugin. How stable is that now? https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS says above: "The following FTS indexers (in preferred order) are supported" but fts-xapian is listed below all others and Solr at the top. Is the wiki just outdated? Felix