Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? What is the difference in performance?
On 4.7.2019 12.14, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:> Hi > I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x > > Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via > /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ > I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk > (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) > > A few clients have 25K and more e-mail > > I thinking about use solr like: > ?fts = solr > ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) > > Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? > What is the difference in performance? >Hi! Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that much. Using FTS usually makes sense since it speeds up IMAP fulltext searches. Aki
>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that much. Using FTS > usually makes sense since it speeds up IMAP fulltext searches. > > Aki >Hi So you're advised to use a solr or something else?