similar to: [PATCH 0/7] Fixes for lib-mail message-address

Hello, I borrowed dovecot parser for email addresses and going to use it in new perl module as replacement for Email::Address. During implementation and testing I found bugs in dovecot parser & generator. So I'm sending my patches together with tests. Pali Roh?r (7): lib-mail: message_address_write: Fix generating empty group list lib-mail: message_address_write: Fix generating group

> On April 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Monday 04 April 2016 19:12:56 Pali Roh?r wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I borrowed dovecot parser for email addresses and going to use it in new > > perl module as replacement for Email::Address. During implementation and > > testing I found bugs in dovecot parser &

On Thursday 07 April 2016 16:11:12 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 06 Apr 2016, at 17:29, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Monday 04 April 2016 19:35:22 Pali Roh?r wrote: > >> On Monday 04 April 2016 19:31:06 aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > >>> Can you please send them directly to me, please? > >>> --- > >>> Aki

On Monday 04 April 2016 19:35:22 Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2016 19:31:06 aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > Can you please send them directly to me, please? > > --- > > Aki Tuomi > > Sent. Received? Are patches OK now? -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc

On Sunday 16 December 2018 21:55:23 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 16 Dec 2018, at 21.26, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I found bug in Dovecot's IDLE implementation when virtual mailbox is in > > use. IDLE does not notify about new emails when email appears in newly > > created mailbox and IDLE was issued in virtual

On 6/9/2015 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com> wrote: > On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar at gmail.com> wrote: >> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as >> storage (also for easier backup and copy)... >> >> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mbox files >> which are used

On Monday 08 June 2015 23:06:26 Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2015-06-08 14:48:12 +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > On Monday 08 June 2015 02:45:52 Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > IMHO ... Maildir is a better format. > > > > Really? I do not think so! Having half of million (small) files in > > one directory is killer... which eats caches and slow down access > >

Hello, I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format (described at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which are stored on server (and used by dovecot). What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header) and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format. And what is

Hello! I found bug in Dovecot's IDLE implementation when virtual mailbox is in use. IDLE does not notify about new emails when email appears in newly created mailbox and IDLE was issued in virtual folder which matches "*" wildcard and that mailbox was created after opening virtual mailbox. This problem is present in version 2.2.34 which is available in Debian Stretch system with

On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management > > > mode on cpu 0. > > > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend > > > resume

On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management > > > mode on cpu 0. > > > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend > > > resume

Hello, nouveau xorg driver from master git repository cannot be compiled on ubuntu precise. Here is build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/179062836/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_1:1.0.10-git201407010817~ubuntu12.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Problem is somewhere in drmmode_display.c. Can somebody look at it and fix compile error problems? -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management > mode on cpu 0. > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend > resume cycles in between. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> > --- > V4: add call to get_online_cpus() Pali, any chance to test this ?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management > mode on cpu 0. > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend > resume cycles in between. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> > --- > V4: add call to get_online_cpus() Pali, any chance to test this ?

On Thursday 21 April 2016 15:12:52 Juergen Gross wrote: > On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote: > >> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management >

On Thursday 21 April 2016 15:12:52 Juergen Gross wrote: > On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote: > >> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management >

On Monday 08 June 2015 02:45:52 Marcus Rueckert wrote: > IMHO ... Maildir is a better format. Really? I do not think so! Having half of million (small) files in one directory is killer... which eats caches and slow down access time. Even listing such directory (without reading file contents) consume lot of CPU cycles... PS: I'm not subscribed to this list, so please CC me! -- Pali Roh?r

route is already set to "INVALID_ROUTE" when fill_missing is true, but setting invalid_syntax was not done yet. --- src/lib-mail/message-address.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/lib-mail/message-address.c b/src/lib-mail/message-address.c index 29cac2b..96584e2 100644 --- a/src/lib-mail/message-address.c +++ b/src/lib-mail/message-address.c @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@

On Monday 08 June 2015 23:17:50 Marcus Rueckert wrote: > Through the imap protocol or at least the same locking mechanism > configured in dovecot. > It is which locking mechanism? It is really ok for dovecot to: 1) append (new) emails into mbox file? 2) edit mbox file? (e.g. change some header/body) -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A

file message-address.c: line 43 (parse_local_part): assertion failed: (ctx->parser.data != ctx->parser.end) #0 0x001b3402 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0x0043ed20 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00440631 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #3 0x080f6968 in default_fatal_finish