similar to: Have the Dovecot Enterprise Edition packages been discontinued?

deoren <centos-list at whyaskwhy.org>schreef: On 6/12/2015 4:10 AM, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > Hello, > > I had C6 running on a lot of Latitude E6500 laptops and I now have C7 on all of them, and I do > not have any complaints on overheating. In fact, I get no complaints at all on the laptop, apart from being heavy. > I never had that on any laptop running

Short version: What is the correct way to configure the mail_location option for Mailidr format? I've long had it setup this way: mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n based on this guide: https://www.linode.com/docs/email/postfix/email-with-postfix-dovecot-and-mysql Is that correct? Longer version: After upgrading from Dovecot v2.0.x to v2.2.x yesterday I'm coming

Hi, I'm getting errors when attempting to run apt-get update on an Ubuntu 14.04 box where I've had an existing EE installation for some time: > W: Failed to fetch https://apt.dovecot.fi/stable-2.2/ubuntu/trusty/dists/trusty/main/binary-amd64/Packages HttpError401 > > W: Failed to fetch

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Nathan Duehr" <denverpilot at me.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Zaterdag 20 juni 2015 02:06:18 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + Dell Latitude E6420 laptop = thermalshutdown We also saw some problems with recent Dell machines with ?SpeedStep? or whatever Intel calls their power/speed

I'm still pretty new to running a mail server, but one thing I've come to appreciate over the years is a good backup strategy. Since I have always run my own servers for practice and for personal use I don't have access to Enterprise backup solutions. Because of that I usually just fall back to scripts and tarballs and offload the content on a regular basis. Right now I'm

On 6/16/2015 8:40 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: deoren >> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:26 PM >> >> Looks like the system is a bit warm, but not overly so? So >> far I've not figured out how to check the fan speed. I'll >> keep looking. > > That is the tell tail sign, as it is not cool when under low to no

On 5/5/2016 10:42 AM, Gedalya wrote: > On 05/05/2016 01:00 AM, deoren wrote: >> Goal: >> >> 1) Setup a Google Calendar entry for a biweekly task >> 2) Configure the email notification schedule >> 3) When the email notification from Google arrives have Sieve send a >> notification to an alias I have setup for my cell provider's email to >> text

Goal: 1) Setup a Google Calendar entry for a biweekly task 2) Configure the email notification schedule 3) When the email notification from Google arrives have Sieve send a notification to an alias I have setup for my cell provider's email to text messaging gateway 4) Receive text message I know there are other products which likely handle this better, but I'm specifically attempting to

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Nicolas Thierry-Mieg" <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Woensdag 17 juni 2015 14:46:37 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + Dell Latitude E6420 laptop = thermalshutdown On 06/17/2015 04:49 AM, deoren wrote: > > I'm still puzzled why the laptop appears to

On 6/15/2015 2:04 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > I use a dell e6420 as my daily laptop/workstation. It stays docked and > on 24/7 while at home, often running multiple vms or docker containers. > I've not experienced what you have described. The laptop does get a > little warm during certain video conference meetings, I do not have any > thermal shutdown events. I would check for fan

I searched for them and haven't come across them yet. Could any point me in the right direction? Specifically the Ubuntu 12.04 package notes if they're split out. Thanks!

Hi, I'm currently running version v2.0.x in production (using Maildir storage) and it's been working well. I'm interested in moving to version 2.2.x and am preparing a test server to do so. As I have been merging the conf file changes between the two versions I noticed syntax changes for the 90-sieve.conf file. There are now 'locations' and presumably to keep referring to

ANLEGER UHR BJ5N.F!!! DIE RALLYE IST GESTARTET Firma: BOERSE INVEST BETEI WKN : 797639 ISIN : CH0012802093 Markt: Frankfurt Kürzel : BJ5N.F Preis: 1.90 5-Tag Prognose: 3.00 KAUFEN KAUFEN KAUFEN! BJ5N.F ESGESCHAFT FIN UNTER PARI!

Hey, all. I'm in the middle of a rollout, and just learned that the SoundPoint IP 430 -- my favorite mid-range phone -- has been discontinued. The heir apparent is the SoundPoint IP 450 -- for a low, low, low $130 more/handset. AND it doesn't look as nice. Ouch. Does anyone have any recommendations -- Polycom or otherwise -- for a good-quality, mid-range, two-line SIP phone (with good

I've encountered a following bug: I use one "path" statement in "general" section: "path = /var/network/%S". Then I keep symlinks to my services in /var/network. When I installed samba-2.2.0, my printers stopped working. I've investigated this incident with debug=3 and discovered that samba refused to spool to file "/var/network/%S/smbprn.9". Subj

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: >> >> On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: >>> >>> Looks like this is platform dependent. >> >> Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. >> >> Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required >> as of LLVM 2.7 to

On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: > Looks like this is platform dependent. Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required as of LLVM 2.7 to get RTTI for LLVM symbols? -- Pekka

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> I just tried it again on trunk (not 2.7) on OSX 10.5, and it works. >> What platform are you on? Does it work with another version of gcc? >> > > Looks like this is platform dependent. libLLVM-2.7.so created has size only > 4145 bytes and all llvm symbols are

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> We currently use two different techniques to get whole libraries >> included into the .so. On Linux (gnu ld and gold), we pass >> --whole-archive, while on OSX we pass -all_load. Which ld does FreeBSD >> use? If you can rearrange tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile until it

Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: > On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: >> Looks like this is platform dependent. > > Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. > > Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required > as of LLVM 2.7 to get RTTI for LLVM symbols? > No. If this is a hack to get the command 'g++ -shared -o libLLVM-2.7.so -lXXX -lXXX