similar to: Uniqueness of dovecot mailbox-guids

Update: seems to me that the old cyrus mailserver already uses these non-unique mailbox guids. Is it necessary to have them unique over all private namespaces? Thanks Christian ----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht----------------- Von:Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ] An:"dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot at dovecot.org ] Datum:Thu, 29 Jan 2015

If mailbox guids should be unique systemwide, would it be safe to delete all 'dovecot-uidlist' files of the user's mailboxes and then do a doveadm force-resync after mailbox migration? Thanks! Christian ----------------urspr?ngliche Nachricht----------------- Von: Christian Binder Stadt Freilassing [christian.binder at freilassing.de ] An: "dovecot dovecot.org" [dovecot

Dovecot version: 2.2.9 I'm using doveadm backup to migrate about hundred user mailboxes from cyrus to dovecot. I defined a master user for the old cyrus mailserver in imapc backend to get access to all the mailboxes. Now I realized that after migration every user's "Inbox" or "Trash" on the new dovecot server has the same mailbox-guid, e.g: User a: inbox dd9456...

Sorry if this is a duplicate message. I'm new in this mailing list and not sure if the first message really got posted ... Dovecot version: 2.2.9 We're using doveadm backup to migrate user mailboxes from cyrus to dovecot. I defined a master user for the old cyrus mailserver in imapc backend to get access to all the mailboxes. Now I realized that after migration every user's

Can no one give some adivse on this issue? Thanks Christian

Bump. Can no one give a hint? Thanks a lot! Christian

Greetings all, I can view a mailbox's GUID like so: doveadm mailbox status -u guid However, how may I *modify* a mailbox GUID? Can this be done using doveadm or some other tool? If not, how may I go about modifying the dovecot.mailbox.log (where I assume GUID data is stored)? My specific use case has to do with me wanting to modify an existing mailbox's GUID so that its messages

I'm getting an error backing up mailboxes. I'm using the mirror command: dsync -fvo mail_home=/home/users/bob mirror ssh vmail at 10.1.4.1 dsync -o mail_home=/home/.incoming_mail_migrations/users/bob dsync-remote(vmail): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs: 1ef6ee37c694894d783100000581a675 is shared by INBOX and INBOX dsync-remote(vmail): Error: command BOX-LIST failed

While migrating from mbox to maildir using dsync, I kept running into a brick wall. Some folders would not sync. The message in stderr was: Error message GUID: Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent without index files. This is what solved things for me. I hope this might help someone. Let me know if I'm completely off sides. When working with dsync to migrate from mbox to maildir format mailboxes,

I have a mbox-User with some crazy foldernames: -rw------- 1 vmail vmail 19238931 17. Dez 2011 Foo & Co -rw------- 1 vmail vmail 82415 19. Nov 22:06 Foo &- Co Dovecot can't handle that correctly: # dovecot mailbox list -u user Foo & Co Foo & Co dsyncing those folders produces some errors: dsync(awad): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs:

i can't delete several folders at once. I have a folder structure like folder1/folder2/folder3 (we use slash as hierarchy separator). When i delete folder1 server1 executes the command correctly Apr 16 13:44:28 server1 dovecot: imap(d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de): Mailbox deleted: INBOX/Trash/folder1/folder2/folder3 Apr 16 13:44:28 server1 dovecot: imap(d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de):

On 16 Apr 2015, at 19:22, Dennis Kuhn <d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de> wrote: > > i can't delete several folders at once. I have a folder structure like > folder1/folder2/folder3 (we use slash as hierarchy separator). When i > delete folder1 server1 executes the command correctly > > > Apr 16 13:44:28 server1 dovecot: imap(d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de): >

On 04/17/2015 12:07 PM, Dennis Kuhn wrote: > On 16.04.2015 20:32, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 16 Apr 2015, at 19:22, Dennis Kuhn <d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de> wrote: >>> i can't delete several folders at once. I have a folder structure like >>> folder1/folder2/folder3 (we use slash as hierarchy separator). When i >>> delete folder1 server1 executes

Hello, Dovecot 2.0.9 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) location is set to : mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=MEMORY Index is set to memory due to permissions problems when using disk index. Everything works, even rename folder, but when trying to delete folder, using any mail client, it fails with: "[CANNOT] Mailbox GUIDs are not permanent

On 16.04.2015 20:32, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 16 Apr 2015, at 19:22, Dennis Kuhn <d.kuhn at heinlein-support.de> wrote: >> >> i can't delete several folders at once. I have a folder structure like >> folder1/folder2/folder3 (we use slash as hierarchy separator). When i >> delete folder1 server1 executes the command correctly >> >> >> Apr 16

We're running Dovecot in a multipe instance cluster with individual userdb-querys to different LDAP-Servers. As far as I can see there's no way to use the doveadm mailbox command with different Auth-Sockets or different configurations. While root at dobby4:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user -a /var/run/dovecot-xy/auth-master p.heinlein at example.com field value uid 10000 gid 10000

> On 22 Jan 2016, at 15:07, Peer Heinlein <p.heinlein at heinlein-support.de> wrote: > > Am 22.01.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > > >> I think this was fixed by https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/f136b0050b3125b466af73984177250b7ed1a3be > > But our installed release ~2.2.21-1~auto+66 has been build on January, > 21th 13:58... So it should be

FWIW, I assign my MAC addresses as "FE:FD:XX:00:YY:ZZ" Where: XX = what xen does to MAC addresses (00 in xen0, 01 in xenU) YY = vmid (unique across all physical servers) ZZ = interface number in xenU (00 = eth0, 01 = eth1) Works for me! Someone asked about trying to find a duplicate MAC address on a network - it''s pretty hard to do as the whole idea is that MAC addresses are

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

In a Rails 2.x validation to check if the name of some model is unique within a some category, I would use: `validates_uniqueness_of :name, :scope => :category_id` In Rails 3, this is replaced with: `validates :name, :uniqueness => true` However, I can''t seem to find a method of defining the uniqueness'' scope. Am I missing something? Thanks, Angelo -- You received