Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "CESA-2019:2836 Important CentOS 7 dovecot Security Update"
2019 Sep 27
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 175, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2019 Dec 24
0
CESA-2019:4326 Important CentOS 7 fribidi Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:4326 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4326
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
067acb5347113d423523dc63ac23348163422108aee38d644e8fa6cc1cbce210 fribidi-1.0.2-1.el7_7.1.i686.rpm
2019 Oct 31
0
CESA-2019:3197 Important CentOS 7 sudo Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:3197 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3197
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
51bef6c9700b2222adbfab925c0859b1f53835237cfecf4e7d4f4645e3832b1b sudo-1.8.23-4.el7_7.1.x86_64.rpm
2020 Apr 16
2
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds
mailbox Spam {
special_use = \Junk
auto = no
}
dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core
2020 Apr 16
2
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains
that the folder Spam does not exist.
dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script
/xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user
logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl]
2020 Jan 22
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated
The log below shows:
[root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
Repository mariadb is listed more than once in
2020 Jan 23
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns
>> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the
>> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover
>> from this would be greatly appreciated
>>
>> The log below shows:
>>
>> [root at
2020 Jan 28
0
CESA-2020:0227 Important CentOS 7 sqlite Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0227 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0227
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
4e7b3e26e7960631fa1b70b58d3d363b51b0f9bee514cdd277c377750d976dd1 lemon-3.7.17-8.el7_7.1.x86_64.rpm
2019 Dec 03
0
CEBA-2019:3972 CentOS 7 sssd BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3972
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3972
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
6a534a09885aeea9c44eed75f2c21159ef33a8fe43c47df641513bfd19c69702 libipa_hbac-1.16.4-21.el7_7.1.i686.rpm
2019 Sep 18
0
CEBA-2019:2679 CentOS 7 libvirt BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:2679
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2679
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
21895646047b35e098755091ef3dfb304bd32e21ed7545cdc16a0795a1c35811 libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64.rpm
2019 Sep 18
0
CEBA-2019:2358 CentOS 7 libguestfs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:2358
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2358
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
3a516ccd167351ea9ad31a8f18cc7aaf72e5171871e0b1aa5e0237bf07820e71 libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.x86_64.rpm
2020 Apr 16
2
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail
clients.
# spam folders merging
mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
auto = create
}
mailbox Spam {
special_use = \Junk
auto = no
}
mailbox "Junk E-mail" {
special_use = \Junk
auto = no
}
On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:
> I do not have the log file anymore from the
2019 Sep 18
0
CEBA-2019:2601 CentOS 7 NetworkManager BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:2601
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2601
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
f280e595ee31a46f7b732310c15465a16f640a09ab8f47e32512f1212d22c055 NetworkManager-1.18.0-5.el7_7.1.x86_64.rpm
2019 Dec 03
0
CEBA-2019:3983 CentOS 7 util-linux BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3983
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3983
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
c63153d62d1a3c58f74ff17e8a567ebedd4266cf07e57df50bd12eb3d3174a9e libblkid-2.23.2-61.el7_7.1.i686.rpm
2019 Sep 18
0
CEBA-2019:2356 CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:2356
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2356
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
88eb240f8af93ff46674ed0f1b33c8f6a9519d4f6863a83221c2547f035b1a65 libgudev1-219-67.el7_7.1.i686.rpm
2020 Apr 16
1
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
Hmmm, confusing, clients should then display the mailbox name redirected
by the server.
If a user in a front end just sees the 'Junk E-mail', that is the name
he is going to be using in his mailbox rules. If he does not know that
this is actually the Junk folder on the server, he will make an
incorrect message rule.
So I guess you have to correct this server side, before storing
2020 Jan 23
2
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated
>
> The log below shows:
>
> [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22
> Loaded plugins:
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:
> Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds
>
>
> mailbox Spam {
> special_use = \Junk
> auto = no
> }
>
> dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
> dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
> CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core
I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:
> I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains
> that the folder Spam does not exist.
>
> dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script
> /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user
> logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details)
So, does that
2020 Apr 16
0
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 23:38, Marc Roos wrote:
> It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail
> clients.
>
> # spam folders merging
> mailbox Junk {
> special_use = \Junk
> auto = create
> }
> mailbox Spam {
> special_use = \Junk
> auto = no
> }
> mailbox "Junk E-mail" {
> special_use