Marc Roos
2020-Apr-16 21:19 UTC
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist. dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl] Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:> Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds > > > mailbox Spam { > special_use = \Junk > auto = no > } > > dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 > dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (CoreI can't tell without insight in the error message and your full configuration (`dovecot -n`). Regards, Stephan
Stephan Bosch
2020-Apr-16 21:32 UTC
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:> I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains > that the folder Spam does not exist. > > dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script > /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user > logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details)So, does that Spam mailbox exist? The mailbox configuration you posted tells me that it is at least not created automatically once accessed. Regards, Stephan.> > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl] > Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12 > To: Marc Roos; dovecot > Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept > special use folder names > > > > On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote: >> Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds >> >> >> mailbox Spam { >> special_use = \Junk >> auto = no >> } >> >> dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 >> dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 >> CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core > I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full > configuration (`dovecot -n`). > > Regards, > > Stephan > >
Marc Roos
2020-Apr-16 21:38 UTC
Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail
clients.
# spam folders merging
mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
auto = create
}
mailbox Spam {
special_use = \Junk
auto = no
}
mailbox "Junk E-mail" {
special_use = \Junk
auto = no
}
On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote:> I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just
> complains that the folder Spam does not exist.
>
> dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of
> script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful
> (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details)
So, does that Spam mailbox exist? The mailbox configuration you posted
tells me that it is at least not created automatically once accessed.
Regards,
Stephan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl]
> Sent: 16 April 2020 23:12
> To: Marc Roos; dovecot
> Subject: Re: Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept
> special use folder names
>
>
>
> On 16/04/2020 21:04, Marc Roos wrote:
>> Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds
>>
>>
>> mailbox Spam {
>> special_use = \Junk
>> auto = no
>> }
>>
>> dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
>> dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64
>> CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core
> I can't tell without insight in the error message and your full
> configuration (`dovecot -n`).
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephan
>
>
Maybe Matching Threads
- Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
- Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
- Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
- Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names
- Bug maybe already resolved? Sieve rule does not accept special use folder names