similar to: CESA-2015:1194 Moderate CentOS 7 postgresql Security Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi Everyone, For some reason a few phones connected to a pfSense box can't make or allow in OpenVPN in port 1194 UDP. So, I established the VPN tunnel on 1194 TCP and it works fine. I would like to know if there is any disadvantages to using TCP over UDP for the tunnel when using Asterisk or is just as reliable and solid as a UDP tunnel? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 Summary: .host is known, .00host isn't ... or is it? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

bugzilla-daemon@lists.xensource.com, le Thu 20 Mar 2008 23:23:35 -0700, a écrit : > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 > > ------- Comment #3 from haicheng.li@intel.com 2008-03-20 23:23 ------- > This bug may be related to c/s #17266 which says that IDE should accept SETMUL > 0 as upstream qemu now does. It is following: > > ---

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX CC|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 Bug ID: 1194 Summary: Kill u 2 Product: ulogd Version: 1.21 Hardware: All OS: Ubuntu Status: ASSIGNED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: ulogd Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1194 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1194.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 04e5e0f86b8d0bf3fe04c1c983fa8becf1500bf360b87d248243458d4f3eefff luci-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1194 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1194.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 38011c1a69aac2d06e4309c0fa4cf17d8fa3f6393d9b99116365d277bf9df8a4 postgresql-8.4.20-3.el6_6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:1194 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-1194.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: ead8dfcb3828518aed74380b77d990bb193ee63417354c20c4b91b2ef95a720f kmod-redhat-ixgbevf-3.2.2_k_rh7.4_z-1.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2017:1194 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-1194.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: cd47bdab22ce9c387beaf066c0e36d63633b07bfcbcad4bda1dac53c74a095e2 kmod-redhat-ixgbe-4.4.0_k_rh7.4_z-2.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:

Version 1.3.1 (2001-08-31) factorial() is not in R. It is in S-Plus with the definition factorial <- function(n) gamma(n + 1) -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not

Hi folks, I have OpenVPN (respect for it developers) running on my FW. Is has two external NICs and on internal everything is fine, except I want OpenVPN (UDP port 1194) going not via default route/network interface. I use such commands: iptables -t mangle -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -p udp --dport 1194 -j MARK --set-mark 0x990 ip rule add fwmark 0x990