similar to: Samba rpms now available from Storage SIG

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Samba rpms now available from Storage SIG"

2020 Aug 18
2
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is to announce
2020 Aug 17
4
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
Hi all, This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] for more details on installation steps. [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba Regards, Anoop C S.
2020 Aug 17
6
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > > for > > more details on installation steps. > > > > [1]
2020 Aug 17
1
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
Hi Anoop, I can see the centos-release-samba412 rpm in the mirror ( http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8/extras/x86_64/os/Packages/) but once I try to update Samba, it says that no packages are marked for update. There isn't a samba-412 in the storage repo ( http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8/storage/x86_64/) as far as I can see (in opposition to samba-411). Am I doing something wrong?
2020 Aug 20
1
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 00:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:55 AM Anoop C S <anoopcs at samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon,
2020 Aug 17
0
Samba rpms now available from Storage SIG
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:07:34 +0530 Anoop C S <anoopcs at disr.it> wrote: > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS Storage SIG > wiki page[2] for more details on installation steps. > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > [2]
2020 Aug 19
0
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:55 AM Anoop C S <anoopcs at samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C
2020 Aug 24
1
GnuTLS, modern Samba and RHEL Re: Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 20:04 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 12:05 +0530, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > > for > > more details on installation steps. > > >
2020 Aug 18
0
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit
2020 Aug 20
0
GnuTLS, modern Samba and RHEL Re: Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 12:05 +0530, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > for > more details on installation steps. > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > [2]
2015 Sep 02
2
Permissions to contribute to Storage SIG wiki pages
Hi, we're working on adding more packages to the Storage SIG. For that I would like to describe the build infrastructure so that other new contributors can understand what build tags/targets are available and where to add/build packages. It seems I need to ask permission to edit wiki pages, could I get edit rights for these? - https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage -
2018 Jun 29
1
Joining CentOS Storage SIG
On 29 June 2018 at 16:21, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 29 June 2018 at 09:07, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:57:13PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: >> >>> >>> Sure. >>> My wiki login name: Saravanakumar >> >> Thanks! I've put centos-docs@ on CC so that a wiki admin
2018 Jun 29
2
Joining CentOS Storage SIG
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:57:13PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: ... > > /It will be great if we can add documentation about running CentOS based />/storage containers (like gluster / ceph containers). />/I can contribute here as well./ > > If you create a wiki login and pass your username, I can give you > > permissions to edit/add contents below > >
2018 Nov 30
2
editing CentOS Storage SIG wiki
Hi folks, I would like to contribute to the CentOS Storage SIG wiki pages. Would you please allow my "ktdreyer" account to edit the following pages? https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/sigworkflow - Ken
2018 Nov 30
2
editing CentOS Storage SIG wiki
Sure, I've renamed it to https://wiki.centos.org/KenDreyer Would you please consider dropping this policy? It's not very welcoming to new contributors, and I don't think it'll integrate well with https://accounts.centos.org/ if the MoinMoin instance can use that for authentication. - Ken On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:39 AM Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On
2020 Aug 24
1
Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > CentOS? > > If you'd like the tools to enable domain controller access. I publish > a set of them, pdated a few days ago to 4.13.0rc2., at > > *
2019 Mar 25
1
About compile samba 4.10
On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 09:51 -0400, Leo C via samba wrote: > Without the option --enable-selftest worked well make and make > install Yup. One patch missed backport which is now being tracked for 4.10.1. You can just apply the patch from [1] and build it yourself. [1] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13854 > El vie., 22 mar. 2019 a las 9:23, Leo C (<leonidch076 at
2019 Mar 22
2
About compile samba 4.10
This is my configure options, It has always worked well ./configure --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sbindir=/usr/sbin --bindir=/usr/bin --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/srv --mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-debug --enable-selftest -j 2 --cross-answers --cross-execute El vie., 22 mar. 2019 a las 2:56, Anoop C S (<anoopcs at cryptolab.net>) escribió: > On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 19:47 +1300,
2017 Jul 25
2
Wiki rights requested: Various SIG pages
On 07/24/2017 03:09 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > On 24 July 2017 at 18:33, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: >> I'm hoping to update https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup and >> bring it more in line with reality. As such, can I please get edit rights to >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup >> >> and the docs under that?
2017 Jul 26
3
Wiki rights requested: Various SIG pages
On 07/25/2017 10:03 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Promo >> >> Thanks! >> >> --Rich > > You should have edit rights everything under >