On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms > > > > from > > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki > > > > page[2] > > > > for > > > > more details on installation steps. > > > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > > > [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Anoop C S. > > > > > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > > > with > > > Heimdal ? > > > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does > > not > > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this > > information. > > > > Thanks, > > Anoop C S. > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > CentOS?quoting from the other reply on @centos mailing list: "Unlike Samba from default CentOS repository, which stays at a particular version for a while, Storage SIG Samba is planned to have latest possible stable versions packaged and shipped as and when they are released upstream. Additionally it is aimed at maintaining GlusterFS integration by shipping samba-vfs-glusterfs package with specific VFS module for accessing GlusterFS volumes."
Nico Kadel-Garcia
2020-Aug-19 04:19 UTC
[Samba] Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:55 AM Anoop C S <anoopcs at samba.org> wrote:> > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms > > > > > from > > > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki > > > > > page[2] > > > > > for > > > > > more details on installation steps. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > > > > [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Anoop C S. > > > > > > > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > > > > with > > > > Heimdal ? > > > > > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does > > > not > > > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > > > > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this > > > information. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Anoop C S. > > > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > > CentOS? > > quoting from the other reply on @centos mailing list: > > "Unlike Samba from default CentOS repository, which stays at a > particular version for a while, Storage SIG Samba is planned to have > latest possible stable versions packaged and shipped as and when they > are released upstream. Additionally it is aimed at maintaining > GlusterFS integration by shipping samba-vfs-glusterfs package with > specific VFS module for accessing GlusterFS volumes."I don't have any personal need for vfs, but of course tastes and usages vary. Can I encourage you to consider accepting the burden and compile Samba with heimdal and full domain controller capacity, in a repository with GPG signatures and build stability I've not been able to provide for binaries.
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 00:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:55 AM Anoop C S <anoopcs at samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba > > > > wrote: > > > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) > > > > > > rpms > > > > > > from > > > > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki > > > > > > page[2] > > > > > > for > > > > > > more details on installation steps. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Anoop C S. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD > > > > > domain > > > > > with > > > > > Heimdal ? > > > > > > > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and > > > > does > > > > not > > > > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain > > > > controller. > > > > > > > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this > > > > information. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Anoop C S. > > > > > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > > > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL > > > and > > > CentOS? > > > > quoting from the other reply on @centos mailing list: > > > > "Unlike Samba from default CentOS repository, which stays at a > > particular version for a while, Storage SIG Samba is planned to > > have > > latest possible stable versions packaged and shipped as and when > > they > > are released upstream. Additionally it is aimed at maintaining > > GlusterFS integration by shipping samba-vfs-glusterfs package with > > specific VFS module for accessing GlusterFS volumes." > > I don't have any personal need for vfs, but of course tastes and > usages vary. Can I encourage you to consider accepting the burden > and > compile Samba with heimdal and full domain controller capacity, in a > repository with GPG signatures and build stability I've not been able > to provide for binaries.I am not so sure about building with Heimdal support but including DC components can be looked at going forward. Thanks for your interest.