On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > > for > > more details on installation steps. > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > Regards, > > Anoop C S. > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > with > Heimdal ?Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does not contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this information. Thanks, Anoop C S.
Rowland penny
2020-Aug-17 09:17 UTC
[Samba] Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On 17/08/2020 10:09, Anoop C S wrote:> On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from >>> Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] >>> for >>> more details on installation steps. >>> >>> [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage >>> [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba >>> >>> Regards, >>> Anoop C S. >> Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain >> with >> Heimdal ? > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does not > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this information. > > Thanks, > Anoop C S. >Thanks, I thought that would be the case, but the page explicitly mentioned 'Domain Controller', better to be upfront about the packages capabilities ;-) Rowland
Hi Anoop, I can see the centos-release-samba412 rpm in the mirror ( http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8/extras/x86_64/os/Packages/) but once I try to update Samba, it says that no packages are marked for update. There isn't a samba-412 in the storage repo ( http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8/storage/x86_64/) as far as I can see (in opposition to samba-411). Am I doing something wrong? Thanks! *Jo?o Ba?to* --------------- *Scientific Computing and Software Platform* Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Center for the Unknown Av. Bras?lia, Doca de Pedrou?os 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal fchampalimaud.org <https://www.fchampalimaud.org/> Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu no dia segunda, 17/08/2020 ?(s) 10:17:> On 17/08/2020 10:09, Anoop C S wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > >>> Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > >>> for > >>> more details on installation steps. > >>> > >>> [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > >>> [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Anoop C S. > >> Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > >> with > >> Heimdal ? > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does not > > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this information. > > > > Thanks, > > Anoop C S. > > > Thanks, I thought that would be the case, but the page explicitly > mentioned 'Domain Controller', better to be upfront about the packages > capabilities ;-) > > Rowland > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >
Nico Kadel-Garcia
2020-Aug-18 08:09 UTC
[Samba] Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms from > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki page[2] > > > for > > > more details on installation steps. > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > > [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > > > Regards, > > > Anoop C S. > > > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > > with > > Heimdal ? > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does not > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this information. > > Thanks, > Anoop C S.Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and CentOS? If you'd like the tools to enable domain controller access. I publish a set of them, pdated a few days ago to 4.13.0rc2., at * https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ I may be a bit fussy about this, but I've gotten a bit tired of having to keep updating these.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:10 AM Anoop C S via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 07:47 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > On 17/08/2020 07:35, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is to announce the availability of Samba(and CTDB) rpms > > > > from > > > > Storage SIG[1] on CentOS 7 and 8. Visit Samba's CentOS wiki > > > > page[2] > > > > for > > > > more details on installation steps. > > > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > > > > [2] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Samba > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Anoop C S. > > > > > > Hi Anoop, Are these packages capable of provisioning an AD domain > > > with > > > Heimdal ? > > > > Nope, these are built with system MIT kerberos requirement and does > > not > > contain bits and pieces to setup Samba as an AD domain controller. > > > > For better clarity I will update wiki page to contain this > > information. > > > > Thanks, > > Anoop C S. > > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > CentOS?quoting from the other reply on @centos mailing list: "Unlike Samba from default CentOS repository, which stays at a particular version for a while, Storage SIG Samba is planned to have latest possible stable versions packaged and shipped as and when they are released upstream. Additionally it is aimed at maintaining GlusterFS integration by shipping samba-vfs-glusterfs package with specific VFS module for accessing GlusterFS volumes."
Andrew Bartlett
2020-Aug-18 10:54 UTC
[Samba] Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> > > If you'd like the tools to enable domain controller access. I publish > a set of them, pdated a few days ago to 4.13.0rc2., at > > * https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ > > I may be a bit fussy about this, but I've gotten a bit tired of having > to keep updating these.I just wanted to say a big, public note of thanks for your efforts here. I've been playing with rebuilding these packages on a similar OS and it would have been much, much more work without your tooling. Thanks! Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Andrew Bartlett
2020-Aug-24 02:49 UTC
[Samba] Samba rpms now available from CentOS Storage SIG
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 04:09 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> > Then what, precisely, is the point of these non-RHEL supported > updates, rather than using the versions built into the base RHEL and > CentOS? > > If you'd like the tools to enable domain controller access. I publish > a set of them, pdated a few days ago to 4.13.0rc2., at > > * https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ > > I may be a bit fussy about this, but I've gotten a bit tired of > having > to keep updating these.Nico, One innovation (compared with how most Samba for RPM-based-systems) in the CentOS storage packages are that they do not use the system tdb,talloc,tevent,ldb etc. Samba is tested with the version that is included in the release, and updates to the system version can break other things (sssd is the most likely, but in theory almost any of the other dependencies). It seems to me both safer and (the reason I mention it to you) I hope a little less work to maintain just Samba packages, and not the bundle of libraries as well. Anoop, You might wish to remove the redundant declaration of the minimum talloc/tevent/etc versions from the top of the .spec, these are either unused or redeclared later on. Thank you both for all your efforts! Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba