similar to: discord: things to do to run it.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "discord: things to do to run it."

2019 Nov 20
4
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. The corporation behind Discord is just not authorising you legally to use any of those tools at hand. There are rarely any technical barriers or countermeasures, though. Roman Lebedev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. nov. 18., H, 16:08): > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:10 PM Nico Weber via
2019 Nov 18
3
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 07:29, Kristina Brooks via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > While I understand the difficulty regarding mailing lists especially > if one isn't used to setting up mailboxes and filters to classify and > label emails and do think a web forum may be easier to use, I would > have concerns over Discord. Unlike IRC which has a fairly open
2019 Nov 19
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about
2019 Nov 19
2
Fwd: RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On 11/19/19 9:09 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: Note there is also Slack, which does not have these problems. Not sure why that keeps being overlooked My understanding is this is because Slack does not have good moderation tools. I'm unfamiliar with further details in this regard. -Hal On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at roblox.com<mailto:zturner at
2019 Nov 20
3
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18 PM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 08:44, Whisperity via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. > > This is a big uphill fight that is rarelly worthy. Not to mention > privacy guarantees and terms and conditions
2020 May 10
0
CentOS 7, zoom, and discord... konqueror
Firerox is my default browser, but both zoom and Discord pull up konqueror. Any idea why? mark
2019 Nov 19
3
Fwd: RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
But is it better or worse than IRC in this regard? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM Daniel Chapiesky via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Daniel Chapiesky <dchapiesky2 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for >
2019 Nov 18
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
> > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, > and often intimidating for newcomers > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use > multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email > as a **mechanism** being unfamiliar/difficult/intimidating. Moving to a > new mechanism wouldn’t alter the
2019 Nov 18
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI
2019 Nov 18
3
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is
2019 Nov 19
3
Fwd: RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
Slack's community moderation features are pretty terrible - it's simply not set up for managing public-facing communities; it's set up for managing private workplace team collaboration.  The best way to try to explain the features which are missing are to look at something like the Matrix moderation guide (https://matrix.org/docs/guides/moderation/); many of these features are
2019 Nov 21
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
If I am not mistaken, there are two things that are becoming clear: 1. For email, nobody seems to be against Discourse as long as the mailing lists are still a supported way to participate. So this seems non-controversial. 2. For IRC, people seem to be happy with switching to a more modern solution, but Discord is largely disliked by a significant portion of respondents. So perhaps we can focus
2019 Nov 18
5
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear
2019 Nov 26
0
4.9.x -> 4.10.x : any major things to consider?
On 26/11/2019 20:23, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 26.11.19 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >> Am 26.11.19 um 20:50 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>> On 26/11/2019 19:44, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>>> Am 26.11.19 um 20:39 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>>> >>>>>> I assume I have to start
2019 Nov 26
2
4.9.x -> 4.10.x : any major things to consider?
Am 26.11.19 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 26.11.19 um 20:50 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 26/11/2019 19:44, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> Am 26.11.19 um 20:39 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>> >>>>> I assume I have to start over: demote that DC2 etc >>>>> >>>>> Should have left
2019 Nov 26
2
4.9.x -> 4.10.x : any major things to consider?
On 26/11/2019 19:44, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 26.11.19 um 20:39 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > >>> I assume I have to start over: demote that DC2 etc >>> >>> Should have left office when I could an hour ago. >>> >> Definitely sounds like you should, you are probably tired and it is >> easy? to make mistakes when you are
2016 Apr 25
2
bug: cross-compile Clang/LLVM for ARM using Clang/LLVM
Hi renato, 1. The command above is followed by the guide[ HowToCrossCompileLLVM.rst ] and I specify some path(ex. <path-to-host-bin>). 2. The including x86_64 libraries is added because of some missing libraries(ex. "error: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it"). As I have found that the bugs needed to dealt with is some ARM-dependent libraries, I
2019 Nov 20
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 21:36, Whisperity via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > there will be the other 70+ gaming-related servers constantly nagging for attention... I very literally cannot cope with that at all. I can't "just filter" the noise on my own, so, if that becomes the norm, I'll be forced to pass.
2019 Nov 18
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, and often intimidating for newcomers > > > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use multiple avenues of communication, it’s *really* hard to imagine email as a *mechanism*
2012 Feb 25
1
WoW Worked Once, Now it Don't I'm Stumped
Before we start, I am new to Linux, so please be gentle. I only got as far as I did due to google and this website. I installed World of Warcraft using Wine. After 2 days of troubleshooting and fixing driver issues, I was able to log in last night and the game ran flawlessly. I logged out, installed all of my normal addons logged back in and they all worked. I played for about an hour and