similar to: yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated > > The log below shows: > > [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 > Loaded plugins:

I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated The log below shows: [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Repository mariadb is listed more than once in

> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns >> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the >> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover >> from this would be greatly appreciated >> >> The log below shows: >> >> [root at

I was in the middle of a yum update on physical box over teh weekend and power died. Ssytem came pack up. But now when I run yum-complete-transaction I get all kinds of errors (these are just the last 4, there are many) systemtap-runtime-4.0-10.el7_7.x86_64 has installed conflicts systemtap-devel < ('0', '4.0', '10.el7_7'): systemtap-devel-4.0-9.el7.x86_64

On 05/12/2019 19:48, S?rgio Basto wrote: > I made the packages [1] (BTW I'm a fedora packager maintainer ). > > [1] https://github.com/sergiomb2/sambaad You have used heimdal and not MIT, haven't you ? > >>> I just migrate the users and his password nothing more ... I had >>> to >>> remove a lot of fields, OU(s) etc for example: [1] . >> Just

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: >On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: > > > >> <snip> > > > > > > > >> > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream > >> updates. > >> > >> OK .. I have also now pushed the CentOS Linux 8 update .. you should see > >> an update to SHIM .. the new

Hi, what is the workaround for this? https://www.nginx.com/blog/php-fpm-cve-2019-11043-vulnerability-nginx/ in either CentOS 7 or 8 ? thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee

Sieve rule fileinto Spam fails, while fileinto Junk succeeds mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } dovecot-pigeonhole-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core

Hi, I was just wondering whether this possible bug with the Sernet Samba3 RPMs for CentOS 5 is known, since it has not yet been fixed. When uninstalling the Sernet RPMs for Samba3 (in this case Samba 3.2.x) the %postun scriptlet fails every time with: # rpm -e samba3-3.2.0-36 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56356: line 2: fg: no job control error: %postun(samba3-3.2.0-36.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status

Hello, at the last update (Kernel updated from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64) I got these messages Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or directory warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package

I do not have the log file anymore from the home dir. It just complains that the folder Spam does not exist. dovecot: lmtp(xxxx): oG8YI6enmF7FIAAAI7dPvA: sieve: Execution of script /xxxx/.dovecot.sieve failed, but implicit keep was successful (user logfile /xxx/.dovecot.sieve.log may reveal additional details) -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Bosch [mailto:stephan at rename-it.nl]

I receive a local mail when I do a 'mail test' on a backend svr1 with this[0] configuration. However when I just add only one configuration change 'lmtp_proxy = yes' I am getting these errors[1]. I would expect this email to still be delivered locally, should this be working or do I misunderstand the lmtp proxy functionality? [0] passdb { args = auth_verbose = default

Hi Marius, Will make the changes and see how it goes. On the other hand https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 if the above was released we could just install and migrate to rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems>

i am using dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7_7.1.x86_64 on centos 7 is it possible to activate / deactivate a sieve script for a mailbox from the command line? my mailboxes are currently stores in /../vmail/domain.tld/username if i activate / deactivate a filter set using roundcube (webmail system) then it creates or deletes a symbolic link /../vmail/domain.tld/username/dovecot.sieve? which points to a

It is a 'special use' folder, so it only appears to exist in mail clients. # spam folders merging mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk auto = create } mailbox Spam { special_use = \Junk auto = no } mailbox "Junk E-mail" { special_use = \Junk auto = no } On 16/04/2020 23:19, Marc Roos wrote: > I do not have the log file anymore from the

Hello, I post here because I have an embarassing issue considering the yum version provided with CentOS 5. I am trying to package an application for CentOS. So I wrote my own specfile which is composed of declaration of various packages (main application and plugins for this applications). In that the configuration, the plugins RPM depends on the main application RPM because. Moreover, in

CentOS, RHEL, all versions. Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files. It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been installed. So what happens if foo-1.0 needs to run a binary that was provided as part of foo-1.0 during its %preun stage, and a binary of the same name is

When I installed Samba 3.2.6 from Sernet, I got the following error: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54116: line 2: fg: no job control error: %postun(samba3-3.0.32-36.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 The error happens when installing the samba and winbind RPMs. I got the same error when installing the previous version 3.2.5 and perhaps 3.2.4. The "rpm-tmp.number" was different in those cases,

I changed my Sernet Samba repos from 3.4 to 3.5 and updated the Sernet Packages on my CentOS Server with yum. During the installation I got %postun errors. The command "rpm -qa | grep -i samba" lists the following packages as installed: samba3-3.5.0-41.el5 samba3-3.2.11-40.el5 samba3-client-3.5.0-41.el5 samba3-3.2.8-38 samba3-winbind-3.5.0-41.el5 When I want to remove the useless