similar to: Is kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 tested with old hardware?

Is there any known problem with accountsservice-0.6.35-12 with NFS users? After logging in via lightdm they are not "remembered" and there is no entry created to /var/lib/AccountsService/users Downgrading to accountsservice-0.6.35-9 resolved that issue Gerhard Schneider -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural

An user is using 2 displays and configured Gnome to "Static Workspaces only on primary display on" using gnome-tweak-tool Till 7.2 it was working as expected. After upgrading to 7.3 the content on the primary screen gets mirrored to all workspaces. When switching to "Static Workspaces only on primary display off" everything is working as expected on 7.3, too. Any ideas?

After upgrading approx. 50 machines to 7.4 we discovered a reproducible SegFault of one of our commercial programs we use. This SegFault does not occur on CentOS 7.3 and it occurs only on Xeon E3-1230 V3, Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-2697 v2. It does NOT occur on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon E3-1231 v3, AMD Ryzen and older Core I7-9xx. It is not dependent of the kernel, we switched back to an CentOS

https://communities.vmware.com/message/2686431 is working for me. GS -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural Biomechanics (E317) Tel.: +43 1 58801 31716 TU Wien / Vienna / Austria Fax: +43 1 58801 31799 A-1060 Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/BE02 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/~gs/

Dear all, Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But maybe in a different way ... Thanks to the (great!) quick work on making the plus kernel available (in #14330,

Many people seem to wait for the announcement of CentOS 6.0, so I want to share some test results I did with SL 6.0.. The actual 6.0 kernel can NOT allocate tape buffers when the server is heavily loaded at least on some LSILogic hardware. There is a big problem of slab buffer increase that can cause reboot/freeze of the server under load. Reported by many and verified by me :-( So perhaps

The upstream provider decided to remove OpenGPG support in its thunderbird-78 packages, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886962 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886958 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837512 recommending to either use Mozilla binaries, use Flatpak or switch to Evolution Is there any plan to provide thunderbird-78-full packages in e.g.

Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown invocation

Hi folks, before I flood the bug tracking system, I just want to send you a list of problems I encountered when using xen under Debian Etch (i386 on Intel Core2 Duo E6750). Shall I open a seperate bug report for each of the items below or are some of them features that are known to be missing in the xen release? - A HVM domain does not start when using a physical disk without specifing the

I can play WoW perfectly, it is 100% stable and I can get great fps. One problem though, when I minimize the game and I maximize it, sometimes I can just keep playing happily but sometimes thats not the case. I minimize it, maximize it again and the FPS drops to about 10-20fps (anywhere). As you might know, this is VERY annoying, I've tried changing loads of settings in-game with no help.

Do CentOS 5.4 users still have to use the RedHat preliminary kernels (http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/) for getting a NFSv4 safe kernel or have the patches been incorporated into CentosPlus kernels? Or is kernel-2.6.18-164.3.1.el5 somewhere in the queue? Thanks in advance! GS -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Groep <davidg at nikhef.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > Maybe I'm the only one - so before filing it as a bug: it appears that > the latest set of kernel patches in 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7 makes issue > 0013763 "CentOS 7.4 kernel (3.10.0-693*) fails to boot as Xen PV guest" > re-surface *also* with the CentOS PLUS kernel. But

Are there any known race conditions with 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 x86_64 and NFS4? Today a user managed to shut down two identical Intel servers by copying a simple text file via NFS4. Reverting back to 17.1 made the error disappear. On other non-identical hardware the error was not reproducible (so it must be a combination of hardware and this special kernel revision). Anybody interested in a

Are there any 64bit CentOS5 kernels available that are immune against the exploit mentioned in the subject? Turning off 32bit support is no option to me.. Gerhard Schneider P.S.: Source code can be found at http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268 and is working "well" on 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5.centos.plus -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs

After a crash I tried wget http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/x86_64/kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.x86_64.rpm as usual. But for 32.1 there is no kernel-debuginfo. Is there any reason for that? Thank you in advance! Gerhard Schneider -- Gerhard Schneider e-Mail:gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Institute of Lightweight Design and Tel.: +43 664 60 588 3171

On 02/12/2011 09:00 AM, Gerhard Schneider wrote: > > Sorry, I don't use CentOS 6 now so I cannot check, but: > > Could it be that RHEL6 changed the default superblock mdadm is creating? > CentOS 5 is creating a 0.9 superblock. Some "other OS" are creating 1.2 > per default. But you can change that on the command line. > > If that's the case it's not a

Dear, I''m looking to get Xen running on a system that (afterwards) seems a bit too new. The board has the Intel G33 chipset with the Intel ICH9 southbridge. This chipset is NOT supported by kernel 2.6.18 which ships with Xen 3.1.2 (and Debian Etch). So the question is: * What version of Xen to install to get going? Should I choose unstable? * What distribution will be the easiest to get

Hi all, On dual core processor machine, I installed ubuntu-8.04 in which I installed xen-3.2. In ubuntu: # cat /proc/cpuinfo --> Shows two processors information. But in Xen on the same machine: # cat /proc/cpuinfo --> Shows only one processor information. Can anyone please explain what could be the reason behind this? Thanks Saravana

On 01/08/2018 02:10 PM, Shaun Reitan wrote: > While installing the experemental kernel on a CentOS 7 PV the following > happened. After a reboot of the PV the kernel looks to be installed but > there is no option for booting it in grub. ?I attempted to run yum > reinstall kernel-4.9.75-204.el7.centos.x86_64 and it installed fine but > still no entry in grub. No initramfs existed and

On 01/06/2018 03:16 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > The same problem with latest centos 6 kernel,i.e. with meltdown fix. > > I can't see console output, because I have it on "cloud" provider > hosting :-) > > > > 06.01.2018 05:13, Shaun Reitan ?????: >> Broken! >> >> For those of you looking for a PV enabled client Kernel for CentOS Linux