similar to: mailing list mail from @yahoo addresses

On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: >> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been >> kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's >> DMARC. > > Hi, > > Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. > > Regards > >

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 21:25 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > >> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > >> kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > >> DMARC. > > > > Hi,

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > DMARC. Hi, Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. Regards Phil -- Google+: https://goo.gl/CPjvNo Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/ GitLab:

For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's DMARC.

On 04/11/16 17:18, Richard wrote: > [extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.] > > >> From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk >> Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016 >>> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400 >>> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> >>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at

On 11/4/2016 11:29 AM, lejeczek wrote: > well, I'm not sure if I feel better now, I understand there must a > plethora of people who fidgeted like me trying to understand what > happened (some time ago) - I see I'm not alone, but... it seems larger > issue. Would be great if list maintainer(s) look into this and even > greater if can fix it. we can't fix yahoo,

[extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.] > From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk > Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016 >> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400 >> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>> ps. I

A few hours ago 20 addresses got unsubscribed from this list due to bounces caused by Yahoo's DMARC p=reject policy: https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN24050.html This breaks mailing lists. Yahoo are well aware of this, but don't seem to care: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2141120/yahoo-email-antispoofing-policy-breaks-mailing-lists.html The nearest Yahoo seem to come to useful advice is

Hi Eric, Fwiw, mailman has a 'cleanse-dkim' handler which strips DKIM-related > headers entirely. Maybe that's enough to get mails through... > This is insufficient. You need to rewrite the From. Looks like Mailman has this feature now: http://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC Olly, you'll need to upgrade to 2.1.16 to be able to turn this on. Unfortunately, I suspect things

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > A few hours ago 20 addresses got unsubscribed from this list due to > bounces caused by Yahoo's DMARC p=reject policy: > > https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN24050.html > > This breaks mailing lists. Yahoo are well aware of this, but don't seem > to care: Fwiw, mailman has a 'cleanse-dkim' handler which strips

All, Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the

All, Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the

so... I've got some mailman lists running on centos 6. apparently c6 has mailman 2.1.12, which is far too old to have the dmarc patches (introduced in 2.1.16 and updated in 2.1.??, so of course, I'm having ongoing issues with yahoo/sbc/att/aol/etc subscribers and bouncing messages ending up causing 30%+ of my subscribers not to be able to get mail. These are mostly non-technical

> Date: Saturday, June 16, 2018 05:25:05 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > > On 06/15/2018 05:18 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >> dig +short txt _dmarc.yahoo.com >> "v=DMARC1; p=reject;

On 06/15/2018 05:18 PM, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 14:55:21 -0700 >> From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Gianluca Cecchi >> <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Il Ven 15 Giu 2018, 18:45 Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> >>> ha scritto:

so, supposedly mailman 2.1.16+ has a feature that allows you to configure mailman lists so yahoo won't have a hissy with their new implementation of DMARC. http://www.spamresource.com/2014/04/up-in-arms-about-yahoos-dmarc-policy.html has anyone packaged this as an RPM for CentOS 5 ? I currently have mailman 2.1.9 from whatever repo it came from (probably base?) -- john r pierce

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

> > > > > > Let's see what happens. > > > > > > > Perhaps this time? > > I did miss the reason why a new test would be usefull. > Perhaps are people behind the curtains too shy :-) > > The test did NOT show any improvement. > > > In the webinterface of mailman, that is where I access privileges, > is now

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:53 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog19 at eaglescrag.net> wrote: > On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:

On Wed, November 12, 2014 15:50, g wrote: > > > On 11/12/2014 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> >> Well, no. Per the headers: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: >> centos-bounces at centos.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) >> smtp.mail=centos-bounces at centos.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not