On 11/4/2016 11:29 AM, lejeczek wrote:> well, I'm not sure if I feel better now, I understand there must a > plethora of people who fidgeted like me trying to understand what > happened (some time ago) - I see I'm not alone, but... it seems larger > issue. Would be great if list maintainer(s) look into this and even > greater if can fix it.we can't fix yahoo, they broke this. the only "solution" is to hack the 'from' of emails sent to the list so they are 'from' the list server rather than 'from' the person who sent the message. I've seen a few lists that do this, its awful seeing every message be 'From: <list at listserver>' -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's DMARC.
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > DMARC.Hi, Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. Regards Phil -- Google+: https://goo.gl/CPjvNo Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/ GitLab: https://gitlab.com/philwyett_hemi/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20161109/5f77e02a/attachment-0001.sig>
On 04/11/16 18:48, John R Pierce wrote:> On 11/4/2016 11:29 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> well, I'm not sure if I feel better now, I understand >> there must a plethora of people who fidgeted like me >> trying to understand what happened (some time ago) - I >> see I'm not alone, but... it seems larger issue. Would be >> great if list maintainer(s) look into this and even >> greater if can fix it. > > we can't fix yahoo, they broke this. the only "solution" > is to hack the 'from' of emails sent to the list so they > are 'from' the list server rather than 'from' the person > who sent the message. I've seen a few lists that do > this, its awful seeing every message be 'From: > <list at listserver>' > >samba at list has it working, it does not look that bad. My, Name via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>