similar to: I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7

On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm >> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. > > > Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I think John's question

On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote: > On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any >> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been >> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I >> need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be

On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >> smoketest environments -- match the production environment > > > I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: > > http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html Great resource!

On 8/24/2016 4:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm > involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, > and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib > available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can > download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the

On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm > involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I think John's question is pertinent. If you're building a binaries to distribute, your best bet might actually be to produce multiple builds targeting

On 08/25/2016 06:26 PM, Peter wrote: > On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >>>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment >>> >>> >>> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:

On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: > To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any > version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been > using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I > need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be moving to a Ubuntu 14 > environment, which is spec'd

On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment >> >> >> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: >> >>

On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- > smoketest environments -- match the production environment I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html

On Dec 9, 2019, at 17:54, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, those consoles are available but they are NOT my original text mode login console which used to be vt1 and is now taken over by Gnome. What they do is bring me to a login prompt -- this is NOT what I want. This change to vt1 for my GUI, in this case, Gnome is a change with version 7 of CentOS due to some

On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so >> I went in search of an update. > Adobe stopped releasing Flash for Linux a while back. IIRC the only > "supported" Flash on Linux is distributed as a part of Google Chrome > (and

Hello all-- I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so I went in search of an update. I came across several references for getting flash plugin 32 that basically were the same as this page -- https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-flash-player-10-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/ However, it seems the site -- |http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/ does NOT

J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: > > On 16/01/2020 20:37, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >>>> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so >>>> I went in search of an update. >>> Adobe stopped releasing Flash for

On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the >>>> message of 06/02-- >>>>

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the > > message of 06/02-- > > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html > > > > Nor have I seen any additional information. So how

> Am 07.12.19 um 19:23 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > Hello all-- > > > > It seems using ctrl-alt-F1 to exit from GUI back to MY OWN > > SESSION'S > > command line does not work for me. It does nothing. > > > > Is this something that needs to be explicitly enabled? I start GUI > > using > > "startx". > > > > Also, any

A GREAT MYSTERY! See inline... On 1/16/20 1:00 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Steve Clark wrote: > >> On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >>>> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so >>>> I went in search of an update.

Hello all-- It seems using ctrl-alt-F1 to exit from GUI back to MY OWN SESSION'S command line does not work for me. It does nothing. Is this something that needs to be explicitly enabled? I start GUI using "startx". Also, any info on what to use to get BACK to my X11 session. Discussions seem confusing on this point. Thanks for any help. -- "And in the end, only

Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the message of 06/02-- https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html Nor have I seen any additional information. So how is this going? I'm almost ready to jump in as I would really prefer to be on Gnome 3. -- -------------------------------------------- MzK ?The journey of a thousand miles begins

> James Pearson wrote: >> >> J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: >>> >>> On 16/01/2020 20:37, Steve Clark wrote: >>>> On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>>>> Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >>>>>> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so