Kay Schenk
2016-Aug-24 23:22 UTC
[CentOS] I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
Hello all-- Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me. I really like CentOS and would hate to change distros at this point, but, well, it might come to that. :( Any advice truly appreciated. -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "God helps those who help themselves." -- popular adage
John R Pierce
2016-Aug-24 23:44 UTC
[CentOS] I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 8/24/2016 4:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm > involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, > and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib > available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can > download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me.whats the target OS for the builds from these build machines ? to change the default libc would require rebuilding (and retesting) the whole OS. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
Kahlil Hodgson
2016-Aug-24 23:57 UTC
[CentOS] I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:44 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote:> On 8/24/2016 4:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm >> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, >> and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib >> available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can >> download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me. > > > whats the target OS for the builds from these build machines ? > > to change the default libc would require rebuilding (and retesting) the > whole OS.I believe glib is just the Gnome utility libraries, unlike glibc which has the core C runtime libraries. Upgrading glib is probably less dire, though it -- Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Chief Technology Officer (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 Direct Pricing Exchange Pty Ltd Suite 1415 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer." -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Gordon Messmer
2016-Aug-25 00:02 UTC
[CentOS] I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm > involved with, I need at least glib 2.19.Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I think John's question is pertinent. If you're building a binaries to distribute, your best bet might actually be to produce multiple builds targeting specific Linux distributions. Alternately, some specific LSB release (none of which, as far as I can tell, require glibc 2.19+).> Right now I have glib 2.12, > and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14.CentOS 7 is built on glibc 2.17. Also, minor correction: "glib" is the name of a different library than glibc.
Kay Schenk
2016-Aug-25 01:21 UTC
[CentOS] I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:> > On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm >> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. > > > Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, Ithink John's question is pertinent. If you're building a binaries to distribute, your best bet might actually be to produce multiple builds targeting specific Linux distributions. Alternately, some specific LSB release (none of which, as far as I can tell, require glibc 2.19+). To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be moving to a Ubuntu 14 environment, which is spec'd at glibc 2.19 near as I can determine. So a long story. We will not be building for targeted environments. Write after I wrote this, I thought maybe I could get a zip of what I needed and just install it without overwriting my setup. Then set an env variable to run the generated build. Thanks for the responses.> > >> Right now I have glib 2.12, >> and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. > > > CentOS 7 is built on glibc 2.17. > > Also, minor correction: "glib" is the name of a different library thanglibc.> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Maybe Matching Threads
- I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
- I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
- I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
- I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
- I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7