similar to: PHP version not enough for developers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "PHP version not enough for developers"

2015 Oct 23
2
PHP version not enough for developers
On Fri, October 23, 2015 8:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally >>> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates >>> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around >>> 2.6
2015 Oct 23
4
PHP version not enough for developers
On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a >> misconception on my part or an actual change in the environment.
2015 Oct 23
0
PHP version not enough for developers
James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally >> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates >> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around >> 2.6 kernel) . . . > > I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have
2015 Oct 23
0
PHP version not enough for developers
Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> James B. Byrne wrote: >>> >>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >>> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a >>> misconception on my
2015 Oct 24
4
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> James B. Byrne wrote: >>>> >>>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >>>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >>>> must reboot my
2015 Oct 22
3
PHP version not enough for developers
El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribi?: > > On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: >>> >>> El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: >>>> Kai, >>>> >>>> It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's >>>> not
2015 Oct 24
0
Re: PHP version not enough for developers
Yamaban wrote: >The mess we have now, is not the work of just one change. >What was the rationale to get udev into boot? -- Handling the ever >changing mess of plugable, switchable hardware. Not born and bred >for servers, but for mobiles (phones, tablets, laptops). >Who was the one that decided that "one-size-fits-all" and put that >into server environment? IMHO
2005 Jan 26
2
I need Help everyone I just bough my Xten Eyebeam
Hello Everyone I just bough my Xten Eyebeam but i don figure out how to make the video works i only see a black screen where de remote video suposse to appear, Any help regarding this matter will be very preciated Thank You
2015 Jan 08
1
Design changes are done in Fedora
On Thu, January 8, 2015 10:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> > wrote: >> >> A perusal of the contents of both the Fedora devel list and users list >> does not give one much hope that such a point of view would be >> tolerated, much less welcomed. > > Exactly. They don't care about
2005 May 13
3
Poor volume on SPA-2100 due to asterisk?
I just bough a Sipura SPA-2100 to use with Asterisk. When I use the analog handset plugged into the SPA-2100, the person on the other end can hardly hear me. I check the SPA-2100 setup and their is no mic/spk gain control. Is this a problem with the SPA-2100 or with Asterisk? Any way for asterisk to compensate for the poor audio level (if the problem is the SPA-2100)? Thanks, Mike
2015 Jan 08
6
Design changes are done in Fedora
On Wed, January 7, 2015 09:48, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:45:29PM -0600, John R. Dennison wrote: >> It's not relevant in _any_ sense. CentOS is nothing more than (at >> it's core) a rebuild of RHEL. This type of nonsense should be >> directed to Red Hat in a Red Hat venue. It's nothing but >> off-topic noise here as CentOS will
2015 Oct 22
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to > use the latest version of Zend. They are proposing using this
2015 Oct 22
0
PHP version not enough for developers
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST): > It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue > to be supported by Red Hat with security patches. Exactly. Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and 5.6 are really state of the art and often necessary to install certain software packages or for some functionality.
2015 Oct 22
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to > use the latest version of Zend. They are proposing using this
2015 Oct 22
0
PHP version not enough for developers
El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: > Kai, > > It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. > Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches, without interruptions, in a very
2015 Oct 23
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > But coming back to negative part (which is about almost any Linux > distribution). These often reboots started in my recollection around 2.6 > kernel which is long ago. There's no way that needing a reboot is related to 2.6. Indeed newer features like ksplice can /reduce/ the number of reboots required. jh
2015 Oct 24
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/23/2015 05:45 PM, Yamaban wrote: > Well, looking back, during kernel 2.6 there was no systemd at all. > But! That was the time where udev and dbus came into the boot cycle. > ... > What was the rationale to get udev into boot? -- Handling the ever > changing mess of plugable, switchable hardware. Not born and bred > for servers, but for mobiles (phones, tablets, laptops).
2015 Oct 24
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/24/2015 10:08 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Was it? Many servers are deployed as standard images, both physical > and virtual, and having a single, standard, cloned image boot easily > on multiple types of hardware makes lots of sense in this > environment. Dbus is about hardware enumeration, both cold and hot > plug. And there are servers with hotplug PCIe, even hotplug
2015 Oct 24
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark > specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. For example, you could help out with Devuan, which aims to remove systemd from Debian, or you can switch to Slackware, one of the few major distros not to even include
2015 Oct 26
0
PHP version not enough for developers
On 10/24/2015 01:59 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote: >> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark >>> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. >> >> For