similar to: centos 6 and mailman and dmarc

On 8/1/2015 12:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > What do y'all do? build your own mailman infrastructure from > source? is there a 3rd party repo build of mailman 2.1.16+ ? ugh, and Mailman 3 requires Python 3.4, whihc isn't available on CentOS 6 without major jacking around. Is there an alternative 'new' email list handler people use? I have two sorts of lists,

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > Test from Yahoo via Android > > --Gene > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux As some users may already be aware, my test

Hi! It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have been restored. Aki

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Test from Yahoo via Android > > > > --Gene > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > > Unsubscribe or set options at:

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >?????????? <snip/> > > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > > but ignores

On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( > > It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known fact that DMARC does not

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header to > the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list on > planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple - period So, e-mail is hard these days, and mailing list e-mail is even harder. Read up about the interactions between

>I wonder (please forgive my ignorance), whether there would be any >change/improvement if the "Reply-To:" and "CC:" fields would be >interchanged (back) from the current behavior (since March 2014 or so, >http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-March/021895.html ). Perhaps >Hotmail (and family) would accept these (Yahoo-originated) messages >then? AFAIK if the

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > <snip/>

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: <snip/> > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure. > > The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject > > We shall see how

UNSUBSCRIBE > -----Original Message----- > From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf > Of Michael A. Peters > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:21 AM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: DMARC policies > > On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Hi! > > > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095359 Jan Kalu?a <jkaluza at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|mailman-2.1.12-22.el6 |mailman-2.1.12-23.el6 Tadaaah! -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

Hi guys, when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how? This is the first report: This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200. The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy. For

Test from Yahoo via Android --Gene

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing

Hi List Subscribers, In recent months we have been seeing an increasing number of bounced deliveries from libvirt mailing lists[1] due to DMARC policies on list subscriber's mail servers. IOW, many subscribers are only receiving a subset of mails sent to the libvirt mailing lists. We believe the root cause of many of the problems is that mailman is modifying the mail subject to add the

I get about a half dozen rejection messages from various servers when I post to this list. Is there something I need to configure differently in my DMARC record to be better compliant? Daniel

Just reading up on DMARC, toying with setting it up to auth against incoming emails. (but not configure my domain to use dmarc, or at least not yet) ran into an article about opendmarc, which is available on epel. but when I took a look at the opendmarc website and the git pages it doesn't appear to have been updated in several years. while I see that it is still available from epel, I

Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if someone else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16. I *need* to update the version of Mailman on my CentOS 5 server to Mailman 2.1.16 in order to be able to use the from_is_list option to deal with DMARC issues with Yahoo, Aol, and Hotmail. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com Deepwoods