similar to: Centos 6 Sendmail backup MX Config

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

On Fri, February 13, 2015 10:57, Ken Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is > correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. > > If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for > domain > bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a > > Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY > >

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct > as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. > > If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain > bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a > > Connect:bbbbb.co.uk

Hi, I've got a relatively simple tinc setup. I've got two "servers" that are on the public internet that act as routers for three "clients" that are behind NATs. Those servers are called aaaaa and bbbbb the clients are xxxxx, yyyyy and zzzzz Unfortunatly the servers have problems accepting a connection from the clients syslog on aaaaa: Sep 29 18:28:58 schuerrer

Dear friends, How do I stop partial matching of list names? e.g., x <- list(AAAA="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") is.null(x$A) #returns FALSE even though there is no element A. if(is.null(x$A)) {result <- x$BBBB} else {result <- x$A} result #is aaaa even though there is no x$A element x <- list(CCCC="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") if(is.null(x$A))

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> >> In this case the secondary MX has the same RBL's etc etc as the primary. >> I do see the spammers sending their junk to the secondary more than the >> primary MX. Agree the secondary does not know the difference between >> valid and invalid addresses. >

Thanks Rowland - appreciated. I have checked the ldbsearch result and both groups look to be pretty much exactly the same to me, one of them is shown below (I have sanitised some of the output, replacing parts with 123/a/b/c, but the rest of the output is byte for byte as seen) In the time between posting my original message and checking again just now, however, I have the following additional

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

Hi all, I am using RStudio. I wanted to copy and past an expression/line. I highlighted it, and then copied and pasted: The result was not the line that I wanted, instead, it was the line above... For example: I have three lines: aaaaa bbbbb ccccc .... I highlighted "bbbbb" and copied, but the pasted outcome was "aaaaa"... What happened? Thanks al ot! [[alternative

Hi, In the Sweave output for summary for several types of model objects and also for the comparison of models with anova, I find that that the display of the call(s) or formula does not obey the width option, even with keep.source=TRUE set, so that a long formula will overshoot the margins in the document. I would like to know if there is a good way to correct that. Looking at the print.summary

Hi Is there any function to do bitwise or/and/xor on long bit vectors? "aaaaa" "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000......................" "bbbbb" "0000000000000000000000000000001000000000000100000000100000001100......................" "ccccc"

Hi, one short question: Is it possible for the zaptel driver to deal with multiple phone numbers on one single E1 PRI line? I could make my carrier route +49 xxx aaaaa-zzz and +49 xxx bbbbb-zzz and others down one single PRI trunk to our asterisk box terminating in a Digium TE410P. Does the driver handle this and can I put calls coming in all on the same physical interface put into

Hello, Here is the logic that I am trying to achieve. I have a User Model and the business rule is that user can accept maximum 5 friends requests. for this I have an accept method in User Model which looks similar to below code snippet def accept(friend) raise ArgumentError if self.friends.count >= MAX_FRIENDS_ALLOWED ... ... #code to add friend to friends list end As you

On 24/10/15 18:18, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Thanks Rowland - appreciated. > > I have checked the ldbsearch result and both groups look to be pretty > much exactly the same to me, one of them is shown below (I have > sanitised some of the output, replacing parts with 123/a/b/c, but the > rest of the output is byte for byte as seen) > > In the time between posting my original

Hi, I am sure I have come across this before but have previously either ignored it or somehow worked around it. However it has come up again and this time I will try to find out what's going on, hopefully we can fix whatever the issue is. I have a Samba 4.2.2 domain that generally works fine; I have rfc2307 enabled so that I can keep UIDs/GIDs consistent across machines whilst still being

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

Hello all. I am sure that this is an FAQ but I cannot find a succinct answer anywhere. My question is: What is the correct way to access a Samba share when the Samba server has a private IP adress (eg 192.168.x.y), the (Windows via PPP) client is assigned a relevant private address (eg 192.168.x.z) and the username/password used to login to the client is not known to the server and/or is

A newer version of the patch. Replaces the previous (ie. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-February/004553.html) version. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: no_slow_intrin_v2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2959 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Applied with minor reformatting. Thanks. And btw, about reformatting: currently stream_encoder.c contains the following code: #ifdef FLAC__SSSE3_SUPPORTED if(encoder->private_->cpuinfo.ia32.ssse3) aaaaa; else #endif #ifdef FLAC__SSE2_SUPPORTED bbbbb; #endif This code is correct because if FLAC__SSSE3_SUPPORTED is defined then FLAC__SSE2_SUPPORTED is