similar to: SSI?

Any thoughts on running Xen on OpenSSI? We have an app we''d like to cluster but is expressly and completely incompatible with the OSes that OpenSSI are supported on, but if we can run several Xen domains on a cluster we can run those OSes and, naturally, that app. Thoughts? CD _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Forgive me if I sent this twice, I think I hit the "send" button by mistake. --- Bj�rn Tore Svinningen <bt@erter.org> wrote: > I''ve seen your post on xen''s forum about running Xen ontop of openssi. > > Have you got''en any further on this idea ? Had the same idea myselves, > but it seems all posts I find end nowhere. Hm, I thought this

Hey Group, We are trying to build a shared disk, shared cpu, shared ram....using a dell power edge servers.....which can utilize our server resource for our expanding website. We are running RHEL4 on dell power edges. Can anyone suggest any good production ready open source solution running on top of 2.6 kernel that might work for us? I have looked at openMosix which has only 2.4 kernel

Proposal for Google Summer of Code 2011 (draft) Appling organisation:Xapian Name : Nijil.Y E-mail address: nijil.y at gmail.com IRC nickname : laserbled Biography I am 4thyear Computer Science and Engineering undergraduate student at CUSAT University from India.I am interested in open source and search engines , cluster computing , HPC and AI would be my areas of interest. * Analytical,

I tried to make 5 separate patches, but as they are constructive, they had information from the last one. So I will post one by one as it gets on the tree. 1. We had a function isUsedInTerminator that tested if a comparator was used in the terminator of its parent BasicBlock. This is wrong because a comparator can be created in a BasicBlock and used in the terminator of other BasicBlock, and

Dear LLVM Community, I am one of the summer of coders working on LLVM this year. My project is to implement the ABCD algorithm for array bounds checking, and also a bitwidth analysis that maps variables to an approximation of its size in bits. To implement this, I will have to simulate a intermediate representation called SSI (Static Single Information) form on top of LLVM SSA

By static array bounds checking, I mean eliminating array bounds checking which can be proved ``safe'' at compile-time. Well, even though there are a lot of approaches of doing this, I believe that having an implementation of ABCD would very useful. It would be even more useful if LLVM can have a general framework for doing static array bounds checking -- just like the aliasing framework.

Hey Im slowly learning ruby and rails... still having some problems with grasping the basic concepts though. How do I include a common html snippet in some of my views? (The snippet exists in two different flavors, I want to include either one depending on what type of user (admin/others) is requesting the page) I have tried the normal SSI include tags, but my WEBrick server cant handle

Dear Andre, That's great! Thanks for the blog. I am really looking forward into using ABCD in vmkit! Cheers, Nicolas Andre Tavares wrote: > Dear Community, > > I'm working on a project for Google Summer of Code, to implement the > ABCD and Bitwidth analysis in LLVM. I'm not going to extend the > description of the project here, this link shows my proposal >

I need to invoke a script in my cgi-bin with a ssi include. Is there a way to do this in rails? I found a post that I have to add an OutputFilter for dispatch.fcgi to go through mod_ssi. Can anybody tell how to do this? Thanks, Simon -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Dear Community, I'm working on a project for Google Summer of Code, to implement the ABCD and Bitwidth analysis in LLVM. I'm not going to extend the description of the project here, this link shows my proposal http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct/projects/gsoc_2009/proposal. I have been in some discussions on this list about Ada and SSI that helped on my decisions up to this

Mai, Haohui wrote: > Dear Nicolas, > > I'm curious why you are using ABCD in vmkit. Do you need any features > from static array bounds checking? As far as I know, SAFECode has a > number of implementation for that. > > Thanks. > > Haohui > > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:48 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > >> Dear Andre, >> >> That's

Dear Nicolas, I'm curious why you are using ABCD in vmkit. Do you need any features from static array bounds checking? As far as I know, SAFECode has a number of implementation for that. Thanks. Haohui On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:48 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Dear Andre, > > That's great! Thanks for the blog. I am really looking forward into > using ABCD in vmkit!

It's generally said that OM needs lots more swap than plain Linux. There has to be someplace to juggle processes around. We use 4 GB nodes with something like 12 GB swap; that plus round-robin logins to distribute home nodes seemed to solve a lot of our problems. To use oMFS to allow processes to write from the node they've migrated to you also need DFSA enabled. That sounds like a great

Memory could be an issue. The three nodes in the cluster we are using only have 512 MB. The machines are otherwise identical in terms of hardware. They are dual PIIIs (purchased from Penguin Computing in 2001). (If you need specs on motherboard etc, we can get that info together.) The installed operating system is RHEL-3, standard workstation with some additional libraries (e.g., all of the

I could use some input to point out the error in my configuration, which eludes me. Previously I operated a 225-node cluster with samba 4.3 and sssd on the Linux boxes. Everything worked OK. Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using winbind in place of sssd (my first experience with winbind). BIND9_DLZ

Hi there, We're currently attempting to explain a slowdown of an LVQ-type parallel analysis we're working on. We are benchmarking our analysis running over openMosix against the same running via SNOW for R. Both perform similarly on small datasets, but on large datasets SNOW drastically outperforms openMosix. However, these results are achieve running SNOW on the default RedHat

On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/02/2020 19:15, Steve Thompson via samba wrote: >> Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. > Have you compiled Samba yourself, or are you using Samba packages and if so, > where from ? >> The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using >> winbind in place of sssd

Hi there, We're attempting to run an LVQ analysis over a cluster of machines via R and openMosix. R spawns several child processes simply by writing commands to several files and using system() to start a slave process. The processes migrate perfectly, and often finish with no reported errors, writing their results into respective files for the parent process to piece together.

Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this question. In that event, please point me in the right direction. My question is whether or not I can use Xen with OpenMosix. The upshot of what I''m attempting to do is this: 1. Build a two to four node cluster using OpenMosix for "raw horsepower" 2. Use Xen on the OpenMosix cluster to divide the "raw horsepower" any