similar to: Fwd: xen-4.4.3-1 packages released

On 24 Sep 2015, at 14:38, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 09/24/2015 04:11 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: >> Forwarding this to the list as I had a problem with our domain being >> blacklisted: >> >> <centos-virt at centos.org <mailto:centos-virt at centos.org>>: >> host mail.centos.org <http://mail.centos.org>[72.26.200.203]

Hi all. I got blocked with the first post and and the message now has been posted multiple times! Sorry about that :( Kind Regards, Keith Begin forwarded message: > From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at nhs-pd1e-esg106.ad1.nhs.net> > Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender > Date: 10 July 2015 09:30:06 BST > To: <Keith.Roberts at ecric.nhs.uk> > >

In case someone's using the nixspam RBL and wondering why the influx from the CentOS mailing lists has stopped today: http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Thanks for all the replies. Looking at the specs for the processor it does not seem to have the vmx features in /proc/cpuinfo: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-2-Duo-T6400-Notebook-Processor.35100.0.html and the output from grep -E ?vmx|svm? /proc/cpuinfo is empty. /lib/modules/3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/arch/x86/kvm [keith.roberts at acer-centos kvm]$ ls kvm-amd.ko kvm-intel.ko

Thanks Nux for your reply. I have tried doing the search and all these packages are installed: ======================================= N/S matched: kvm ======================================= libvirt-daemon-kvm.x86_64 : Server side daemon & driver required to run KVM guests qemu-kvm-tools.x86_64 : KVM debugging and diagnostics tools qemu-kvm.x86_64 : QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator

Hi all, Just out of curiosity: is there anything we can do, on the samba side, to counter the recent ransomware attacks? (or limit the damage done) I'm thinking like: limit the number of files per second a client (workstation) is allowed to edit, or some other smart tricks..? It would be nice if samba could be an extra layer of defense. Something perhaps a vfs module could help with..?

OK, not sure what happened, my response was rejected by Centos: Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with [Subject: "RE: [CentOS] Mail has quit working"] to centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host

Most of the time since last Thursday or so, that piece of crap called Nixnet (ix.manitu) has been blocking my hosting provider's mailservers. I did ask, when I talked to support last week, and they host *millions* of domains. They do not have a million techs (neither does google - but I'm *sure* none of you have ever gotten spam from google mail, right?). Again, I'll give my argument

Hi all. I have just installed Centos 7.1 from the DVD image: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503-01.iso and I cannot find the KVM modules. Are they in a repo that is not in the base distribution please? Kind Regards, Keith -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:51, Marcos Amorim <marcosmamorim at gmail.com> wrote: > > Warning: This message contains unverified links which may not be safe. You should only click links if you are sure they are from a trusted source. > Keith, > > Try modprobe > modprobe kvm > modprobe kvm_intel > > > Regards, > > > Marcos Amorim Thanks Marcos. I

Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you > using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is > allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is > your system is compromised with a spambot. > Why are you top-posting? And another reason it may be blocked is the same reason *I* get

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:10:06AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:24:15PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > Updated Xen 4.4.3 packages have passed my local smoke tests, and are > > now available. > > > > Full C7 release is still waiting on suitable testing for the libvirt packages. > > > > If someone wants to step up

Updated Xen 4.4.3 packages have passed my local smoke tests, and are now available. Full C7 release is still waiting on suitable testing for the libvirt packages. If someone wants to step up to give the libvirt packages a decent smoke test, that will speed the C7 release process significantly. Otherwise it will have to wait until I get a chance to write some automated smoke tests. In the mean

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working From: Nataraj <incoming-centos at rjl.com> Date: Mon, July 23, 2018 9:01 pm To: centos at centos.org On 07/23/2018 03:39 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > Hello, > > Mail has come to an abrupt stop. Running C7, postfix and dovecot. Using > Roundcube as the client. > > Mail stopped working Saturday and I

I've been blocked twice this morning, and removed myself once - the first time, by the time I got to work and looked at the list, it was already gone. My hosting provider works with those jerks at manitu. I've ranted a number of times over the years at why their method is a *lousy* method for blocking spam in the second decade of the 21st century. Now this: here's another argument as

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

There was some discussion about the lack of visibility of the Xen4CentOS development process. The Xen spec files and supporting patches are kept in a git tree. I've pushed copies of these trees here: https://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen xen-44 is the branch for Xen 4.4 development, and xen-46 is the branch for Xen 4.6 development. As is normal, these repos do not contain many of the binary

listadmin, Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of domains, with too many running Windows, and so infected and sending out spam. They then send all mail via one mailhost, with the result that those of us with *no* spam coming out are frequently

On 11/04/2019 14:33, Anton Dollmaier via dovecot wrote: >> Which is why a dnsbl for dovecot is a good idea. I do not believe the >> agents behind these login attempts are only targeting me, hence the >> addresses should be shared via a dnsbl. > > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > attempts and dnsbl): > >>

On 11/04/2019 11:43, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: > A. With the fail2ban solution > - you 'solve' that the current ip is not able to access you It is only a solution if there are subsequent attempts from the same address. I currently have several thousand addresses blocked due to dovecot login failures. My firewall is set to log these so I can see that few repeat, those