similar to: Apologies for multiple posts

On 24 Sep 2015, at 14:38, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 09/24/2015 04:11 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: >> Forwarding this to the list as I had a problem with our domain being >> blacklisted: >> >> <centos-virt at centos.org <mailto:centos-virt at centos.org>>: >> host mail.centos.org <http://mail.centos.org>[72.26.200.203]

Forwarding this to the list as I had a problem with our domain being blacklisted: <centos-virt at centos.org>: host mail.centos.org[72.26.200.203] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [62.208.144.128] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by mx-ha.web.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:14:02 +0200. Begin forwarded message:

Thanks for all the replies. Looking at the specs for the processor it does not seem to have the vmx features in /proc/cpuinfo: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-2-Duo-T6400-Notebook-Processor.35100.0.html and the output from grep -E ?vmx|svm? /proc/cpuinfo is empty. /lib/modules/3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/arch/x86/kvm [keith.roberts at acer-centos kvm]$ ls kvm-amd.ko kvm-intel.ko

Hi Marcos. The processor is an intel centrino in an acer aspire 5735 laptop. I?ll take another look at this problem later, and post the exact error message asap. Kind Regards, Keith On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:46, Marcos Amorim <marcosmamorim at gmail.com> wrote: > Keith, > > What error? > > What's your processor? if it's AMD, you need modprobe kvm_amd instead of

On 07/24/2015 09:38 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: > Thanks Nux for your reply. > > I have tried doing the search and all these packages are installed: > > ======================================= N/S matched: kvm ======================================= > libvirt-daemon-kvm.x86_64 : Server side daemon & driver required to run KVM guests > qemu-kvm-tools.x86_64 : KVM debugging

In case someone's using the nixspam RBL and wondering why the influx from the CentOS mailing lists has stopped today: http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is your system is compromised with a spambot. Mike On 07/24/2018 07:31 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > OK, not sure what happened, my response was rejected by Centos: > > Reason: There was

I've been blocked twice this morning, and removed myself once - the first time, by the time I got to work and looked at the list, it was already gone. My hosting provider works with those jerks at manitu. I've ranted a number of times over the years at why their method is a *lousy* method for blocking spam in the second decade of the 21st century. Now this: here's another argument as

Thanks Nux for your reply. I have tried doing the search and all these packages are installed: ======================================= N/S matched: kvm ======================================= libvirt-daemon-kvm.x86_64 : Server side daemon & driver required to run KVM guests qemu-kvm-tools.x86_64 : KVM debugging and diagnostics tools qemu-kvm.x86_64 : QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator

IMO, First secure your entry points.. Mail webserver and proxy and the exit points. ( your users environment in my case windows 7/10 desktops.) Im waiting until trevor has the antivirus vfs is ready for samba 4. @David Disseldrop, you know the status about that, since it was you call to get it in samba. ;-) (https://github.com/fumiyas/samba-virusfilter/issues/23) I've seen good work but

listadmin, Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of domains, with too many running Windows, and so infected and sending out spam. They then send all mail via one mailhost, with the result that those of us with *no* spam coming out are frequently

Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you > using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is > allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is > your system is compromised with a spambot. > Why are you top-posting? And another reason it may be blocked is the same reason *I* get

OK, not sure what happened, my response was rejected by Centos: Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with [Subject: "RE: [CentOS] Mail has quit working"] to centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host

Most of the time since last Thursday or so, that piece of crap called Nixnet (ix.manitu) has been blocking my hosting provider's mailservers. I did ask, when I talked to support last week, and they host *millions* of domains. They do not have a million techs (neither does google - but I'm *sure* none of you have ever gotten spam from google mail, right?). Again, I'll give my argument

Hi, Here is my situation. I share several directories as public, and some other that must be read-write but with authentication (it does not matter is the client supplies the username or not, although it would be nice, but the password is essential as not everybody must have write permission). So what i first did was use the server with "security=user". WindowsXp does not see my shares

On 06/28/2017 07:13 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > IMO, > > First secure your entry points.. Mail webserver and proxy and the exit points. ( your users environment in my case windows 7/10 desktops.) > > Im waiting until trevor has the antivirus vfs is ready for samba 4. > @David Disseldrop, you know the status about that, since it was you call to get it in samba. ;-)

Hai, Not really a question for samba technical, but i can share this. No need for setting things on samba, that wont help a lot. Below is my setup and its just how you configure your pc's. This and almost all other "malware" is EASY to block, but it wil have impact on how your work. First, start with NEVER work/run as user with administrator rights. If one needs it, then not

-- On Friday, November 21, 2003 12:48 PM -0800 "David Wolfskill - david@catwhisker.org" <+freebsd-security+openmacnews+0459602105.david#catwhisker.org@spamgourmet.com> wrote: David, thanks for your reply! >> i've been struggling with setting appropriate rules for an SMTP-server >> behind by NAT'd firewall. > > OK.... <snip> > >>

Sorry to those of you that have received duplicates of my messages over the easter weekend. I had subscribed to the nntp server of my isp (pipex uk) and searched for "samba" it showed a few hits but "gmane.network.samba.general" showed as containing no posts but "mailing.unix.samba" showed a bit more than 20'000 so I subscribed to that and sent a slurr of

Jerry Geis wrote: > Thanks... > I added the "insmod ntfs" re-ran config no boot... > I change the hd1 to hd3 re-ran config no boot... > This is what my partition table looks like. > # Start End Size Type Name > 1 2048 534527 260M EFI System EFI system partition 2 534528 567295 16M Microsoft reser